User talk:Azhag
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Trader Title Difficulties
On Callek's talk page you seem to have an issue with the standards for rating title difficulties. Mind going into detail? -Moderator Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 08:57, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- As the standard is now, sometimes the difficulty number represents a circle and other times it represents a rank. Those two numbers are on totally different scales so it leads to an inconsistent measurement. Sorting by difficulty ends up being useless. I think the correct way to do it would be to have difficulty always be a circle based number, so then it is consistent across guilds and makes sense when sorted. Azhag 19:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- Can't. See, when it's a guild-based title, you can base it off the guild's advancement requirements and get an adequate hypothetical value. If it's just a general title, how? Do you use a barbarian's 6 ranks per circle in primary weapon? Or a moon mage's 0? See the problem? -Moderator Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 00:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- I understand better now, I was confused because a lot of guild titles had been using the "highest ranks" category so once I reread what the guidelines are it does make sense. Azhag 01:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Can't. See, when it's a guild-based title, you can base it off the guild's advancement requirements and get an adequate hypothetical value. If it's just a general title, how? Do you use a barbarian's 6 ranks per circle in primary weapon? Or a moon mage's 0? See the problem? -Moderator Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 00:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Gem Selling
Hey can you proofread and copy-edit Selling_Gem_Pouches for me, I'm not sure if that is clear enough. But I just wanted to write an article on it from all my times explaining the methods to newcomers in the gemshop in crossing! (I plan on writing a page on the numbers, and one "for traders" to refer to eventually) --Callek 18:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)