Category talk:Armor

From Elanthipedia
Revision as of 20:30, 4 January 2018 by ILLIENA (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Needs to be sorted into the various catagories so you can easily reference which is leather, LC, HC, Neutral chain etc.

what about also being sorted into area worn? All these links leading to the items that are Hand Protection, then can do each body part up to full and half-suits that cover whatever? Just a suggestion, remove if you don't like it.-Zefnar

The categories are a temporary measure while Naeya fixes the SemanticWiki things. -Moderator Caraamon Makdasi(talk) 01:39, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Search Problem

Something's going wrong with the "or" functionality. If you do an or with two options from one category, it ignores the other category. For example, a search for cloth armor that covers head OR hands will ignore cloth and return all armor that covers head or hands.--Antendren 11:12, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Sigh. I know, and I'm currently trying to figure out a way to fix it. It has to do with the way OR's are parsed. -Moderator Caraamon Makdasi(talk) 10:23, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Search Hindrances

The armor search isn't updated to the new hindrance scale.--Antendren 11:53, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Huh. Thanks for the heads up, I'd forgotten. -Moderator Caraamon Makdasi(talk) 03:18, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Numberifying errors

The numberifying of armor appraisal values has errors. See here for example, where "good" and "high" are both being translated as 7, even though good should be 5. Might be other errors, that's just the first I noticed.--ILLIENA (talk) 17:36, 3 January 2018 (CST)

Armor has two different scales for protection and absorption. "High" protection is 7/15 and "Good" absorption is 7/18. Both have a numerical value of 7. The page you linked is showing the correct numbers for both. - padhg (talk) 20:08, 3 January 2018 (CST)
Okay, this is embarrassing. I knew that, but I didn't notice that the template was alternating protection/absorption, despite that making sense as a way to organize it. Oops.--ILLIENA (talk) 20:30, 4 January 2018 (CST)