Talk:Marbled angiswaerd

From Elanthipedia
Revision as of 07:19, 17 October 2016 by TEVESHSZAT (talk | contribs) (TEVESHSZAT moved page Talk:Marbled Angiswaerd to Talk:Marbled angiswaerd)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Creature Drive

Bottom cap is about correct as I was being slapped around but could still stand against 1 for a bit. Could hit it with my weapon despite the appraisal, but that is due to my melee mastery of 330.

  • You are certain that it is about as strong as you are. (30)
  • You are certain that it is apparently as agile as you are. (30)
  • You are certain that it is about as disciplined as you are. (30)
  • You are certain that it is about as quick to react as you are. (30)
  • You are certain that it is about as conditioned as you are. (30)
  • Taking stock of its offensive abilities, and defending with a crocodile-skin buckler and a bastard sword, you are certain that the marbled angiswaerd is a quite difficult opponent.
  • Taking stock of its defensive abilities, and attacking with a bastard sword, you are certain that the marbled angiswaerd is a worthy opponent.
  • If you attacked with a bastard sword, you are certain that the enemy would train very well, provided you can land a blow. (209)
  • If you threw the sword at the enemy you are certain that it would train very well, provided you can land a blow. ( Heavy Thrown 188)
  • If you defended by parrying attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train very well. (220)
  • If you defended by evading attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train very well. (220)
  • If you defended by blocking attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train very well. (221)
  • If you attempted to beguile the enemy with tactics, you are certain that it would train exceptionally well, but you probably won't be affecting it. (171)
  • If you attempted to debilitate the enemy, you are certain that it would train very well, provided you can affect it. (203)

--FATBOY30269 (talk) 23:45, 16 August 2015 (CDT)