Talk:Prydaen Terminology: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Phase one done. More later. --[[User:Ogoh|Ogoh]] 23:06, 13 May 2008 (CDT) |
:Phase one done. More later. --[[User:Ogoh|Ogoh]] 23:06, 13 May 2008 (CDT) |
||
:: Multiple pages are evil, not when its so damned short. Wouldnt it be better to redirect those other pages to one single page with all this info? --[[User:Ciaraa|Ciaraa Niahm]] 00:15, 14 May 2008 (CDT) |
:: Multiple pages are evil, not when its so damned short. Wouldnt it be better to redirect those other pages to one single page with all this info? --[[User:Ciaraa|Ciaraa Niahm]] 00:15, 14 May 2008 (CDT) |
||
:::Personally, the overall length of a particular article doesn't really matter to me. My view is that each individual page should try to have a single topic to cover, and that all information about that subject is centralized on one particular page. Once that's done, utilizing categories and links will go a long way to keep the page from feeling isolated and/or stubby (I was planning on adding a category or two tomorrow to further weave things together). But that's my thought on the matter, and why I moved stuff around. Redirects are certainly another very viable option. I leave it to you, and the rest of the group, to figure out what's ultimately best. It's a pretty simple process to switch everything back. --[[User:Ogoh|Ogoh]] 01:53, 14 May 2008 (CDT) |
|||
Revision as of 00:53, 14 May 2008
Article Break-Up
There's a lot of good info here! Breaking up the page will resolve a lot of redlinks (and some of the info, like Cemsiat, is being duplicated on other pages). So, I'm splitting this into multiple pages. --Ogoh 21:31, 13 May 2008 (CDT)
- Phase one done. More later. --Ogoh 23:06, 13 May 2008 (CDT)
- Multiple pages are evil, not when its so damned short. Wouldnt it be better to redirect those other pages to one single page with all this info? --Ciaraa Niahm 00:15, 14 May 2008 (CDT)
- Personally, the overall length of a particular article doesn't really matter to me. My view is that each individual page should try to have a single topic to cover, and that all information about that subject is centralized on one particular page. Once that's done, utilizing categories and links will go a long way to keep the page from feeling isolated and/or stubby (I was planning on adding a category or two tomorrow to further weave things together). But that's my thought on the matter, and why I moved stuff around. Redirects are certainly another very viable option. I leave it to you, and the rest of the group, to figure out what's ultimately best. It's a pretty simple process to switch everything back. --Ogoh 01:53, 14 May 2008 (CDT)
- Multiple pages are evil, not when its so damned short. Wouldnt it be better to redirect those other pages to one single page with all this info? --Ciaraa Niahm 00:15, 14 May 2008 (CDT)