Talk:Revenant conscript: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Are they still corporeal?: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Someone might want to double check this in case something was wrong. I've tried twice with same result. |
Someone might want to double check this in case something was wrong. I've tried twice with same result. |
||
:I also '''thought''' they used to be corporeal, but I recall recently having my weapons slide right through them after a while without refreshing my bless. No idea if its a bug --[[User:Callek|Callek]] 16:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
E.- |
|||
Revision as of 10:02, 29 March 2009
Copied and pasted from Revenant Warrior, then redirected. My baby cleric is fighting these now, and I found Revenant Warrior to be misleading since the critter name is actually revenant conscript. I'll change it back if anyone has problems with it this way.
- --Kittn 20:06, 22 February 2008 (CST)
I'm backtraining on these, and had shield finally cap out at 60 on them, so defenses may have an upper limit of 60. -- Uthrecht 21:53, 3 July 2008 (CDT)
Are they still corporeal?
I recently took a new Barbarian to these. I used to hunt them with non-blessed weapons quite successfully. Now my weapons pass right through them doing no damage of any kind.
Someone might want to double check this in case something was wrong. I've tried twice with same result.
- I also thought they used to be corporeal, but I recall recently having my weapons slide right through them after a while without refreshing my bless. No idea if its a bug --Callek 16:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC)