Talk:Revenant conscript: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Copied and pasted from Revenant Warrior, then redirected. My baby cleric is fighting these now, and I found Revenant Warrior to be misleading since the critter name is actually revenant conscript. I'll change it back if anyone has problems with it this way. |
Copied and pasted from Revenant Warrior, then redirected. My baby cleric is fighting these now, and I found Revenant Warrior to be misleading since the critter name is actually revenant conscript. I'll change it back if anyone has problems with it this way. |
||
:--[[User:Kittn|Kittn]] 20:06, 22 February 2008 (CST) |
:--[[User:Kittn|Kittn]] 20:06, 22 February 2008 (CST) |
||
I'm backtraining on these, and had shield finally cap out at 60 on them, so defenses may have an upper limit of 60. --21:53, 3 July 2008 (CDT) |
I'm backtraining on these, and had shield finally cap out at 60 on them, so defenses may have an upper limit of 60. -- [[User:Uthrecht|Uthrecht]] 21:53, 3 July 2008 (CDT) |
||
Revision as of 21:53, 3 July 2008
Copied and pasted from Revenant Warrior, then redirected. My baby cleric is fighting these now, and I found Revenant Warrior to be misleading since the critter name is actually revenant conscript. I'll change it back if anyone has problems with it this way.
- --Kittn 20:06, 22 February 2008 (CST)
I'm backtraining on these, and had shield finally cap out at 60 on them, so defenses may have an upper limit of 60. -- Uthrecht 21:53, 3 July 2008 (CDT)