Post:Magic 3.0 Stance - 10/10/2010 - 13:29:57: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (1 revision) |
m (fixed link for Rimefang, also fixed dangling PRel) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|f=Abilities, Skills and Magic (4) \ Magic - Suggestions, Discussions and Thoughts (16) |
|f=Abilities, Skills and Magic (4) \ Magic - Suggestions, Discussions and Thoughts (16) |
||
|c=m |
|c=m |
||
|sub=Magic 3.0 |
|||
|p=''>>This means my mage could cast a weak |
|p=''>>This means my mage could cast a weak {{PRel|Rimefang (spell)|Rimefang}} with a high duration? I can see this being useful.'' |
||
Correct. It's a "rob Peter to pay Paul" sort of deal: you can elect to shave off some of your duration to make it a bit more potent, or reduce its potency to shore up its Integrity, etc. |
Correct. It's a "rob Peter to pay Paul" sort of deal: you can elect to shave off some of your duration to make it a bit more potent, or reduce its potency to shore up its Integrity, etc. |
||
| Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
Stance in and out of. |
Stance in and out of. |
||
-[[Armifer]] |
-[[Armifer]] |
||
}} |
}} |
||
Latest revision as of 10:26, 31 July 2017
| Re: Magic 3.0 Stance · on 10/10/2010 1:29:57 PM | 12468 |
|---|---|
| >>This means my mage could cast a weak Rimefang with a high duration? I can see this being useful.
Correct. It's a "rob Peter to pay Paul" sort of deal: you can elect to shave off some of your duration to make it a bit more potent, or reduce its potency to shore up its Integrity, etc. >>Is magic stance something we'll be able to specify while casting a spell with a tortured command argument, or just something you stance into and out of? Stance in and out of. | |
| This message was originally posted in Abilities, Skills and Magic (4) \ Magic - Suggestions, Discussions and Thoughts (16), by DR-ARMIFER on the play.net forums. | |