User talk:GAMERGIRL151: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
GAMERGIRL151 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm making massive revisions to the way we display spells. Go ahead and edit the individual spell pages and ignore the category pages. -[[User:CARAAMON|CARAAMON]] ([[User talk:CARAAMON|talk]]) 21:15, 22 June 2014 (CDT) |
|||
:Ah okay, that should simplify things. I thought I broke everything. --[[User:GAMERGIRL151|GAMERGIRL151]] ([[User talk:GAMERGIRL151|talk]]) 21:17, 22 June 2014 (CDT) |
|||
Hiya! I see you're identifying some critters as Undead vs. more generically evil. I am curious the criteria your are using ... because I am trying to do some of that too and I'm find it difficult to do with confidence. I figure that an Undead should: a) occasionally provide a small wash of devotion to clerics and b) not shock an Empath using Absolution. I do not play an empath to test them with. I have been using my cleric and I concluded that Faenrae Reavers, for example, were Cursed rather than Undead. I suppose my method could be flawed if there were any Undead that never provided a devotion boost to clerics. How would I know? I appreciate your thoughts as I wouldn't want to accidentally shock any empaths. Best Regards --[[User:JBEETLE|Jbeetle]] ([[User talk:JBEETLE|talk]]) 19:36, 24 April 2015 (CDT) |
Hiya! I see you're identifying some critters as Undead vs. more generically evil. I am curious the criteria your are using ... because I am trying to do some of that too and I'm find it difficult to do with confidence. I figure that an Undead should: a) occasionally provide a small wash of devotion to clerics and b) not shock an Empath using Absolution. I do not play an empath to test them with. I have been using my cleric and I concluded that Faenrae Reavers, for example, were Cursed rather than Undead. I suppose my method could be flawed if there were any Undead that never provided a devotion boost to clerics. How would I know? I appreciate your thoughts as I wouldn't want to accidentally shock any empaths. Best Regards --[[User:JBEETLE|Jbeetle]] ([[User talk:JBEETLE|talk]]) 19:36, 24 April 2015 (CDT) |
||
::Empaths can perceive creatures to see if they are undead or living. Everyone can perceive if they are cursed or not (appraising them). I am using both on creatures. If you don't have access to an Empath, you will only have one set of data. As far as I know, this is currently the only way to make the determination. --[[User:GAMERGIRL151|GAMERGIRL151]] ([[User talk:GAMERGIRL151|talk]]) 22:13, 24 April 2015 (CDT) |
|||
Revision as of 21:13, 24 April 2015
Hiya! I see you're identifying some critters as Undead vs. more generically evil. I am curious the criteria your are using ... because I am trying to do some of that too and I'm find it difficult to do with confidence. I figure that an Undead should: a) occasionally provide a small wash of devotion to clerics and b) not shock an Empath using Absolution. I do not play an empath to test them with. I have been using my cleric and I concluded that Faenrae Reavers, for example, were Cursed rather than Undead. I suppose my method could be flawed if there were any Undead that never provided a devotion boost to clerics. How would I know? I appreciate your thoughts as I wouldn't want to accidentally shock any empaths. Best Regards --Jbeetle (talk) 19:36, 24 April 2015 (CDT)
- Empaths can perceive creatures to see if they are undead or living. Everyone can perceive if they are cursed or not (appraising them). I am using both on creatures. If you don't have access to an Empath, you will only have one set of data. As far as I know, this is currently the only way to make the determination. --GAMERGIRL151 (talk) 22:13, 24 April 2015 (CDT)