Talk:Prediction: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:The first bit means that if you get both the power and duration readings, they will be accurate. Note: I'm not claiming this to be correct, although I suspect it is. I'm just 'translating' it for you. |
:The first bit means that if you get both the power and duration readings, they will be accurate. Note: I'm not claiming this to be correct, although I suspect it is. I'm just 'translating' it for you. |
||
:The second bit is now fixed.--[[User:Evran|Evran]] 15:44, 6 August 2010 (UTC) |
:The second bit is now fixed.--[[User:Evran|Evran]] 15:44, 6 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
::But that's completely inconsistent with the claim "[inaccuracy will] always remain to some degree." |
|||
Revision as of 10:07, 6 August 2010
"Inaccuracy only exists without power/duration readings and will increase with skill but almost always remain to some degree." (from Analyze)
I have no idea what the first half of that sentence is trying to say, but I find it unlikely that inaccuracy increases with skill.--Antendren 15:24, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- The first bit means that if you get both the power and duration readings, they will be accurate. Note: I'm not claiming this to be correct, although I suspect it is. I'm just 'translating' it for you.
- The second bit is now fixed.--Evran 15:44, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- But that's completely inconsistent with the claim "[inaccuracy will] always remain to some degree."