User talk:Asrea: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: Yep, they are manipulatable. |
: Yep, they are manipulatable. |
||
:: Well that's odd, seems like if they were "dead" enough that empaths can kill them without penalties, manipulate shouldn't work. Hmmm. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon|talk]])</sup> 04:13, 14 June 2010 (UTC) |
:: Well that's odd, seems like if they were "dead" enough that empaths can kill them without penalties, manipulate shouldn't work. Hmmm. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon|talk]])</sup> 04:13, 14 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
::: Constructs, while all inanimate objects, have been separated into two classifications - cursed (such as boggles, not manipulatable) and non-cursed (gargoyles, clay mages, rock guardians). Trying to manipulate or use spells that will anger undead will also anger cursed constructs. |
|||
Revision as of 02:53, 19 June 2010
Grey Clay Soldier
Did you mean to mark this creature as manipulable?-Moderator Caraamon Makdasi(talk) 04:34, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Yep, they are manipulatable.
- Well that's odd, seems like if they were "dead" enough that empaths can kill them without penalties, manipulate shouldn't work. Hmmm. -Moderator Caraamon Makdasi(talk) 04:13, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- Constructs, while all inanimate objects, have been separated into two classifications - cursed (such as boggles, not manipulatable) and non-cursed (gargoyles, clay mages, rock guardians). Trying to manipulate or use spells that will anger undead will also anger cursed constructs.
- Well that's odd, seems like if they were "dead" enough that empaths can kill them without penalties, manipulate shouldn't work. Hmmm. -Moderator Caraamon Makdasi(talk) 04:13, 14 June 2010 (UTC)