Talk:Revenant conscript: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(→Are they still corporeal?: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:--[[User:Kittn|Kittn]] 20:06, 22 February 2008 (CST) |
:--[[User:Kittn|Kittn]] 20:06, 22 February 2008 (CST) |
||
I'm backtraining on these, and had shield finally cap out at 60 on them, so defenses may have an upper limit of 60. -- [[User:Uthrecht|Uthrecht]] 21:53, 3 July 2008 (CDT) |
I'm backtraining on these, and had shield finally cap out at 60 on them, so defenses may have an upper limit of 60. -- [[User:Uthrecht|Uthrecht]] 21:53, 3 July 2008 (CDT) |
||
== Are they still corporeal? == |
|||
I recently took a new Barbarian to these. I used to hunt them with non-blessed weapons quite successfully. Now my weapons pass right through them doing no damage of any kind. |
|||
Someone might want to double check this in case something was wrong. I've tried twice with same result. |
|||
E.- |
|||
Revision as of 00:07, 29 March 2009
Copied and pasted from Revenant Warrior, then redirected. My baby cleric is fighting these now, and I found Revenant Warrior to be misleading since the critter name is actually revenant conscript. I'll change it back if anyone has problems with it this way.
- --Kittn 20:06, 22 February 2008 (CST)
I'm backtraining on these, and had shield finally cap out at 60 on them, so defenses may have an upper limit of 60. -- Uthrecht 21:53, 3 July 2008 (CDT)
Are they still corporeal?
I recently took a new Barbarian to these. I used to hunt them with non-blessed weapons quite successfully. Now my weapons pass right through them doing no damage of any kind.
Someone might want to double check this in case something was wrong. I've tried twice with same result.
E.-