Talk:Armored warklin: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "==Manipulate== '''8/11/2015:''' Checked manipulate status with 617 Empathy. Result as added. ~~~~") |
MDONOVAN300 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Manipulate== |
==Manipulate== |
||
'''8/11/2015:''' Checked manipulate status with 617 Empathy. Result as added. [[User:HERALD42|HERALD42]] ([[User talk:HERALD42|talk]]) 07:44, 11 August 2015 (CDT) |
'''8/11/2015:''' Checked manipulate status with 617 Empathy. Result as added. [[User:HERALD42|HERALD42]] ([[User talk:HERALD42|talk]]) 07:44, 11 August 2015 (CDT) |
||
July 2016 |
|||
*You are certain that it is rather weaker than you are.(60+) |
|||
*You are certain that it is about as agile as you are.(45) |
|||
*You are certain that it is rather less disciplined than you are.(50) |
|||
*You are certain that it is about as quick to react as you are.(45+) |
|||
*You are certain that it is rather less conditioned than you are.(52+) |
|||
*Taking stock of its offensive abilities, and defending with a skirmisher's shield and a siege arbalest, you are certain that the armored warklin is *definitely less skilled. |
|||
*Taking stock of its defensive abilities, and attacking with a siege arbalest, you are certain that the armored warklin is a simple opponent. |
|||
*If you attacked with a siege arbalest, you are certain that the enemy would train rather well.(322) |
|||
*If you threw the arbalest at the enemy you are certain that it would train rather well. |
|||
*If you defended by parrying attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train acceptably.(460) |
|||
*If you defended by evading attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train acceptably.(430) |
|||
*If you defended by blocking attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train somewhat poorly.(480) |
|||
*If you attempted to beguile the enemy with tactics, you are certain that it would train somewhat poorly. |
|||
*If you targeted and cast a spell at the enemy, you are certain that it would train acceptably.(398) |
|||
*If you attempted to debilitate the enemy, you are certain that it would train acceptably.(396) |
|||
skinning unarranged (401) |
Latest revision as of 02:45, 22 July 2016
Manipulate
8/11/2015: Checked manipulate status with 617 Empathy. Result as added. HERALD42 (talk) 07:44, 11 August 2015 (CDT)
July 2016
- You are certain that it is rather weaker than you are.(60+)
- You are certain that it is about as agile as you are.(45)
- You are certain that it is rather less disciplined than you are.(50)
- You are certain that it is about as quick to react as you are.(45+)
- You are certain that it is rather less conditioned than you are.(52+)
- Taking stock of its offensive abilities, and defending with a skirmisher's shield and a siege arbalest, you are certain that the armored warklin is *definitely less skilled.
- Taking stock of its defensive abilities, and attacking with a siege arbalest, you are certain that the armored warklin is a simple opponent.
- If you attacked with a siege arbalest, you are certain that the enemy would train rather well.(322)
- If you threw the arbalest at the enemy you are certain that it would train rather well.
- If you defended by parrying attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train acceptably.(460)
- If you defended by evading attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train acceptably.(430)
- If you defended by blocking attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train somewhat poorly.(480)
- If you attempted to beguile the enemy with tactics, you are certain that it would train somewhat poorly.
- If you targeted and cast a spell at the enemy, you are certain that it would train acceptably.(398)
- If you attempted to debilitate the enemy, you are certain that it would train acceptably.(396)
skinning unarranged (401)