Talk:Elemental weapon: Difference between revisions
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
Tier 4 and 5 weapons need a quality adjective. This should be a simple thing to add. Tier 2 already has one, crude. --[[User:VMPHNTRD|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD|talk]]) 18:57, 17 June 2015 (CDT) |
Tier 4 and 5 weapons need a quality adjective. This should be a simple thing to add. Tier 2 already has one, crude. --[[User:VMPHNTRD|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD|talk]]) 18:57, 17 June 2015 (CDT) |
||
:Unless there was an update, which I can't find announced on the boards (it's possible it's buried in a thread I haven't read yet) then there is no adjectives for any of the elemental weapons aside from 'crude' for tier 2. That's what the 'n/a' entry means in the table: not applicable. I.e. The 3rd, 4th, and 5th tier versions of each weapon are visually identical and only vary in appraisal.--[[User:ABSOLON|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON|talk]]) 01:15, 18 June 2015 (CDT) |
:Unless there was an update, which I can't find announced on the boards (it's possible it's buried in a thread I haven't read yet) then there is no adjectives for any of the elemental weapons aside from 'crude' for tier 2. That's what the 'n/a' entry means in the table: not applicable. I.e. The 3rd, 4th, and 5th tier versions of each weapon are visually identical and only vary in appraisal.--[[User:ABSOLON|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON|talk]]) 01:15, 18 June 2015 (CDT) |
||
::Right, hence, my belief that the weapons need them. --[[User:VMPHNTRD|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD|talk]]) 18:40, 18 June 2015 (CDT) |
Revision as of 17:40, 18 June 2015
Elemental Damage Colums
What's the point of including three rows of zeros in an already cramped table? ROBERTDH (talk) 23:02, 30 March 2015 (CDT)
tier 5 weps
I fixed and added the tier 5 weapons, some were placed incorrectly in tier 4. I'm assuming the blunts are mislabeled for the tech requirements, as there should be proficient blunt and not expert. -ashbomb
tier 2 LE apps
Here are tier 2 LE weapons if somebody wants to add them - I don't trust my wiki editing to not screw something up:
A crude stone broadsword is a heavy edged melee-ranged weapon.
A crude stone broadsword trains the large edged skill.
You are certain that it could do:
poor (2/26) puncture damage somewhat heavy (8/26) slice damage somewhat fair (4/26) impact damage no (0/26) fire damage no (0/26) cold damage no (0/26) electric damage
The stone broadsword is dismally (2/17) designed for improving the force of your attacks.
You are certain that the broadsword is fairly (5/15) balanced and is decently (6/15) suited to gaining extra attack power from your strength.
You are certain that the stone broadsword is appreciably susceptible to damage (7/18), and is in pristine condition (98-100%).
You are certain that the stone broadsword weighs exactly 35 stones. You are certain that the stone broadsword is worth exactly 230 Lirums. Roundtime: 16 seconds.
>
A crude stone nimsha is a heavy edged melee-ranged weapon.
A crude stone nimsha trains the large edged skill.
You are certain that it could do:
somewhat fair (4/26) puncture damage somewhat moderate (6/26) slice damage somewhat fair (4/26) impact damage no (0/26) fire damage no (0/26) cold damage no (0/26) electric damage
The stone nimsha is dismally (2/17) designed for improving the force of your attacks.
You are certain that the nimsha is decently (6/15) balanced and is fairly (5/15) suited to gaining extra attack power from your strength.
You are certain that the stone nimsha is appreciably susceptible to damage (7/18), and is in pristine condition (98-100%).
You are certain that the stone nimsha weighs exactly 40 stones. You are certain that the stone nimsha is worth exactly 250 Lirums. Roundtime: 16 seconds.
-Firekast
Quality Adjective
Tier 4 and 5 weapons need a quality adjective. This should be a simple thing to add. Tier 2 already has one, crude. --VMPHNTRD (talk) 18:57, 17 June 2015 (CDT)
- Unless there was an update, which I can't find announced on the boards (it's possible it's buried in a thread I haven't read yet) then there is no adjectives for any of the elemental weapons aside from 'crude' for tier 2. That's what the 'n/a' entry means in the table: not applicable. I.e. The 3rd, 4th, and 5th tier versions of each weapon are visually identical and only vary in appraisal.--ABSOLON (talk) 01:15, 18 June 2015 (CDT)