Template talk:RaffleHeader: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:: I think that helped alot! Visually, it's still making my eye twitch but I can't think of a solution for it right now. Need more coffee maybe? I suspect if we specify the width of the first 2 columns, so they are even down the page, my OCD will back-off. I'll tinker around with a table later to see what widths look good. Thanks for following up on my suggestion Caraamon! --[[User:Kythryn|Kythryn]] 16:53, 7 November 2013 (UTC) |
:: I think that helped alot! Visually, it's still making my eye twitch but I can't think of a solution for it right now. Need more coffee maybe? I suspect if we specify the width of the first 2 columns, so they are even down the page, my OCD will back-off. I'll tinker around with a table later to see what widths look good. Thanks for following up on my suggestion Caraamon! --[[User:Kythryn|Kythryn]] 16:53, 7 November 2013 (UTC) |
||
::: Have at it. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon|talk]])</sup> 23:14, 8 November 2013 (UTC) |
::: Have at it. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon|talk]])</sup> 23:14, 8 November 2013 (UTC) |
||
::::Ahhh, OCD-monster appeased! Thanks for letting me play Caraamon, let me know if that looks ok to you. All I did was add a "width" to the first column too. --[[User:Kythryn|Kythryn]] 10:35, 9 November 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:35, 9 November 2013
So I noticed on these 410 raffles, with all the stuff in some of the pouches, the raffle tables get a bit...smooshed. Did we want to increase the width of those from the current width=60% to maybe 75% or 80%? --Kythryn 12:23, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- How's that? -Moderator Caraamon Makdasi(talk) 13:58, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- I think that helped alot! Visually, it's still making my eye twitch but I can't think of a solution for it right now. Need more coffee maybe? I suspect if we specify the width of the first 2 columns, so they are even down the page, my OCD will back-off. I'll tinker around with a table later to see what widths look good. Thanks for following up on my suggestion Caraamon! --Kythryn 16:53, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Have at it. -Moderator Caraamon Makdasi(talk) 23:14, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Ahhh, OCD-monster appeased! Thanks for letting me play Caraamon, let me know if that looks ok to you. All I did was add a "width" to the first column too. --Kythryn 10:35, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Have at it. -Moderator Caraamon Makdasi(talk) 23:14, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- I think that helped alot! Visually, it's still making my eye twitch but I can't think of a solution for it right now. Need more coffee maybe? I suspect if we specify the width of the first 2 columns, so they are even down the page, my OCD will back-off. I'll tinker around with a table later to see what widths look good. Thanks for following up on my suggestion Caraamon! --Kythryn 16:53, 7 November 2013 (UTC)