Talk:Giraud family: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Just my opinion, take it or leave it... It's all water under the bridge, any how. |
Just my opinion, take it or leave it... It's all water under the bridge, any how. |
||
- Talli |
- Talli |
||
: I'm personally just happy when GMs have time to add information. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon|talk]])</sup> 11:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:25, 19 February 2013
It's good to see clarification of House Giraud's status, but I am of the opinion the trial wasn't entirely clear about the end results. Particularly when Sebestyen asked about whether he could continue leading the House in its degraded, suspended state. There was never a blatant 'no' given and the Baron's reaction to the question gave the impression (to me, at least) that he had no quarrel with Sebestyen retaining the title of Lord.
Just my opinion, take it or leave it... It's all water under the bridge, any how. - Talli
- I'm personally just happy when GMs have time to add information. -Moderator Caraamon Makdasi(talk) 11:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC)