Category talk:Characters: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm thinking we would be better served by shifting alive/dead to under GMPCs (among other things). I'll think about an outline format to suggest, and I also think there should be a full listing, (an auto-generated list? haven't messed around much so not sure what all that entails) of characters included in the wiki to enable easy searching. --[[User:Navak|Navak]] 18:37, 21 September 2006 (UTC) |
I'm thinking we would be better served by shifting alive/dead to under GMPCs (among other things). I'll think about an outline format to suggest, and I also think there should be a full listing, (an auto-generated list? haven't messed around much so not sure what all that entails) of characters included in the wiki to enable easy searching. --[[User:Navak|Navak]] 18:37, 21 September 2006 (UTC) |
||
<br/><br/> |
|||
I think it should be renamed to just NPCs. As we all know the GM's can take over an NPC they like. Some GMNPC's have become regular NPCs, etc. An NPC is an NPC. But I agree that Alive/Dead should be moved underneath the NPC cat. --[[User:Grindinghalt|Grindinghalt]] 23:10, 22 September 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:10, 22 September 2006
I'm thinking we would be better served by shifting alive/dead to under GMPCs (among other things). I'll think about an outline format to suggest, and I also think there should be a full listing, (an auto-generated list? haven't messed around much so not sure what all that entails) of characters included in the wiki to enable easy searching. --Navak 18:37, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
I think it should be renamed to just NPCs. As we all know the GM's can take over an NPC they like. Some GMNPC's have become regular NPCs, etc. An NPC is an NPC. But I agree that Alive/Dead should be moved underneath the NPC cat. --Grindinghalt 23:10, 22 September 2006 (UTC)