User talk:Mozzik: Difference between revisions
(Created page with '=Spell Trees= Nice job on updating/creating the spell trees. On the guild pages it seems redundant to have a link to the spell category (which includes the spell tree) followed ...') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Spell Trees= |
=Spell Trees= |
||
Nice job on updating/creating the spell trees. On the guild pages it seems redundant to have a link to the spell category (which includes the spell tree) followed by the spell tree itself. I say we leave them where they were since it's easy enough to click on the guild spell category link to access the tree. This also keeps the clutter on the guild overview pages to a minimum so they don't become the nightmare that the Necromancer page used to be. Thoughts? --[[User:Thilan|Thilan]] 15:01, 31 December 2009 (UTC) |
Nice job on updating/creating the spell trees. On the guild pages it seems redundant to have a link to the spell category (which includes the spell tree) followed by the spell tree itself. I say we leave them where they were since it's easy enough to click on the guild spell category link to access the tree. This also keeps the clutter on the guild overview pages to a minimum so they don't become the nightmare that the Necromancer page used to be. Thoughts? --[[User:Thilan|Thilan]] 15:01, 31 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
I was going to clean up the guild pages some to try and make them more uniform - I moved the tree so the main pages since in updating them I found out just how incredibly inconsistent the linking was to each (It was sorta whack a mole which link lead to it, and sometimes buried several deep), and figure it's sort of the basic information I'd want at a glance for a guild. I'm open to either solution however. --[[User:Mozzik|Mozzik]] 21:06, 31 December 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:06, 31 December 2009
Spell Trees
Nice job on updating/creating the spell trees. On the guild pages it seems redundant to have a link to the spell category (which includes the spell tree) followed by the spell tree itself. I say we leave them where they were since it's easy enough to click on the guild spell category link to access the tree. This also keeps the clutter on the guild overview pages to a minimum so they don't become the nightmare that the Necromancer page used to be. Thoughts? --Thilan 15:01, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
I was going to clean up the guild pages some to try and make them more uniform - I moved the tree so the main pages since in updating them I found out just how incredibly inconsistent the linking was to each (It was sorta whack a mole which link lead to it, and sometimes buried several deep), and figure it's sort of the basic information I'd want at a glance for a guild. I'm open to either solution however. --Mozzik 21:06, 31 December 2009 (UTC)