User talk:Azhag: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Gem Selling: new section) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Can't. See, when it's a guild-based title, you can base it off the guild's advancement requirements and get an adequate hypothetical value. If it's just a general title, how? Do you use a barbarian's 6 ranks per circle in primary weapon? Or a moon mage's 0? See the problem? -Moderator [[User:Caraamon|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon|talk]])</sup> 00:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC) |
::Can't. See, when it's a guild-based title, you can base it off the guild's advancement requirements and get an adequate hypothetical value. If it's just a general title, how? Do you use a barbarian's 6 ranks per circle in primary weapon? Or a moon mage's 0? See the problem? -Moderator [[User:Caraamon|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon|talk]])</sup> 00:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
:::I understand better now, I was confused because a lot of guild titles had been using the "highest ranks" category so once I reread what the guidelines are it does make sense. [[User:Azhag|Azhag]] 01:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC) |
:::I understand better now, I was confused because a lot of guild titles had been using the "highest ranks" category so once I reread what the guidelines are it does make sense. [[User:Azhag|Azhag]] 01:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Gem Selling == |
|||
Hey can you proofread and copy-edit [[Selling_Gem_Pouches]] for me, I'm not sure if that is clear enough. But I just wanted to write an article on it from all my times explaining the methods to newcomers in the gemshop in crossing! (I plan on writing a page on the numbers, and one "for traders" to refer to eventually) --[[User:Callek|Callek]] 18:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:21, 21 January 2009
Trader Title Difficulties
On Callek's talk page you seem to have an issue with the standards for rating title difficulties. Mind going into detail? -Moderator Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 08:57, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- As the standard is now, sometimes the difficulty number represents a circle and other times it represents a rank. Those two numbers are on totally different scales so it leads to an inconsistent measurement. Sorting by difficulty ends up being useless. I think the correct way to do it would be to have difficulty always be a circle based number, so then it is consistent across guilds and makes sense when sorted. Azhag 19:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- Can't. See, when it's a guild-based title, you can base it off the guild's advancement requirements and get an adequate hypothetical value. If it's just a general title, how? Do you use a barbarian's 6 ranks per circle in primary weapon? Or a moon mage's 0? See the problem? -Moderator Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 00:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- I understand better now, I was confused because a lot of guild titles had been using the "highest ranks" category so once I reread what the guidelines are it does make sense. Azhag 01:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Can't. See, when it's a guild-based title, you can base it off the guild's advancement requirements and get an adequate hypothetical value. If it's just a general title, how? Do you use a barbarian's 6 ranks per circle in primary weapon? Or a moon mage's 0? See the problem? -Moderator Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 00:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Gem Selling
Hey can you proofread and copy-edit Selling_Gem_Pouches for me, I'm not sure if that is clear enough. But I just wanted to write an article on it from all my times explaining the methods to newcomers in the gemshop in crossing! (I plan on writing a page on the numbers, and one "for traders" to refer to eventually) --Callek 18:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)