Talk:Hollow Eve Festival 399/Auction: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'LET ME UPDATE THE TABLE AND YOU ALL CAN CHANGE IT FROM THERE.') |
m (TK-421 moved page Talk:Hollow Eve Festival 399 Auction to Talk:Hollow Eve Festival 399/Auction) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Nikpack's Edit== |
|||
LET ME UPDATE THE TABLE AND YOU ALL CAN CHANGE IT FROM THERE. |
|||
I think that short descriptions of each item will suffice, and more details can be added by editing the item links. Otherwise, this table becomes rather unsightly. --[[User:Isharon|Isharon]] 04:34, 7 November 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:I have saved all of the item looks and appraisals and will begin adding that information. --[[User:Isharon|Isharon]] 04:36, 7 November 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::Yay, that means I don't have to. [[User:TEVESHSZAT|TEVESHSZAT]] 04:41, 7 November 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Personally I don't know if I like the short descriptions. I always liked having one page that listed everything rather than having to click on every link. Much of the reason behind having this page was to give a pseudo-log of what was sold, and moving information into deeper pages only hinders that. But I can see the benefit (cleaner looking page, item description can be used for subsequent auctions) of doing it like that.--[[User:Nikpack|Zakuro/Pheer]] 17:49, 8 November 2010 (UTC) |
|||
==Individual Item Pages Question== |
|||
Should the source of the item be the auction company itself or the festival auction? Or both? I think it would make sense to have each item's source link back to this page. I'm basing that on how the weapon with an actual page description from the Magma auction was sourced: {{ilink|w|Dark steel war mattock with a grasping claw capping the blackened iron handle}} [[User:TEVESHSZAT|TEVESHSZAT]] 05:04, 7 November 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:I've been following others' examples and using the auction company. Maybe we could create a page for the auction company and add a list with links to auctions that were conducted by that company. --[[User:Isharon|Isharon]] 17:30, 7 November 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 19:45, 28 November 2020
Nikpack's Edit
I think that short descriptions of each item will suffice, and more details can be added by editing the item links. Otherwise, this table becomes rather unsightly. --Isharon 04:34, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
- I have saved all of the item looks and appraisals and will begin adding that information. --Isharon 04:36, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
- Yay, that means I don't have to. TEVESHSZAT 04:41, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
- Personally I don't know if I like the short descriptions. I always liked having one page that listed everything rather than having to click on every link. Much of the reason behind having this page was to give a pseudo-log of what was sold, and moving information into deeper pages only hinders that. But I can see the benefit (cleaner looking page, item description can be used for subsequent auctions) of doing it like that.--Zakuro/Pheer 17:49, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Individual Item Pages Question
Should the source of the item be the auction company itself or the festival auction? Or both? I think it would make sense to have each item's source link back to this page. I'm basing that on how the weapon with an actual page description from the Magma auction was sourced: Dark steel war mattock with a grasping claw capping the blackened iron handle TEVESHSZAT 05:04, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
- I've been following others' examples and using the auction company. Maybe we could create a page for the auction company and add a list with links to auctions that were conducted by that company. --Isharon 17:30, 7 November 2010 (UTC)