Talk:Shadow's Fall: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
(response to attribution issue) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== Attributions == |
== Attributions == |
||
I don't see how its any different saying "Thanks to X and Y" for doing this than wording it like "After hard work and hours of puzzling, X and Y figured out the above code to mean". It's still an "attribution" just worded differently. The number code was a hard cipher, and like anything on Elanthipedia, I feel it's appropriate to give credit where credit is due. --[[User:Ysselt|Ysselt]] 15:44, 17 October 2010 (UTC) |
I don't see how its any different saying "Thanks to X and Y" for doing this than wording it like "After hard work and hours of puzzling, X and Y figured out the above code to mean". It's still an "attribution" just worded differently. The number code was a hard cipher, and like anything on Elanthipedia, I feel it's appropriate to give credit where credit is due. --[[User:Ysselt|Ysselt]] 15:44, 17 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
:Because several people figured it out independently (myself included). Do we really want articles to turn into a race with whoever getting there first getting their name on it? It's one thing if it's a single and unique event unlikely to occur twice, it's another if it's puzzle or system that any number of people could have contributed to. This has larger implications for all sorts of cases, and so I'm making the ruling that except for special cases, attributions should not be included. As always, you are more than welcome to rebutt, within reason. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon|talk]])</sup> 12:57, 24 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Materials == |
|||
Not sure if it matters or not, but there seem to be several unusual materials there. --[[User:Hithrael|Hithrael]] 18:52, 17 October 2010 (UTC): |
|||
*Gloomwood |
|||
*Darkstone |
|||
*Haralun |
Latest revision as of 06:57, 24 October 2010
hey, uh, not too good with this but have some info that i didn't want you guys to lose, so if someone can format this better please fire away
Recalls/Perc history
I went around trying to perc history/recall rooms but didn't get anything, and so noting for posterity. --Ysselt 00:15, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
title
Can someone change the name of the page itself? It should be "Shadow's Fall". Looks like I tarded out when making it. kinda new at this wiki stuff- Glemm
- Shouldn't it be Shadows Fall? --Ysselt 00:42, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
On the dr website it looks like there's a little apostrophe in Shadow's, kinda hard to tell but it looks like its supposed to be "Shadow's"- Glemm
- Sure does. Just bothers me. Ohwell. --Ysselt 03:41, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Attributions
I don't see how its any different saying "Thanks to X and Y" for doing this than wording it like "After hard work and hours of puzzling, X and Y figured out the above code to mean". It's still an "attribution" just worded differently. The number code was a hard cipher, and like anything on Elanthipedia, I feel it's appropriate to give credit where credit is due. --Ysselt 15:44, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Because several people figured it out independently (myself included). Do we really want articles to turn into a race with whoever getting there first getting their name on it? It's one thing if it's a single and unique event unlikely to occur twice, it's another if it's puzzle or system that any number of people could have contributed to. This has larger implications for all sorts of cases, and so I'm making the ruling that except for special cases, attributions should not be included. As always, you are more than welcome to rebutt, within reason. -Moderator Caraamon Makdasi(talk) 12:57, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Materials
Not sure if it matters or not, but there seem to be several unusual materials there. --Hithrael 18:52, 17 October 2010 (UTC):
- Gloomwood
- Darkstone
- Haralun