Talk:Maiden's tress: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
m (TK-421 moved page Talk:Writhing maiden's tress to Talk:Maiden's tress) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Creature List == |
|||
Adjusted cap upwards on MaxCap. At 200+ evasion, even two tresses moves Evasion beyond 1, whereas 4+ bloodvines will not get it past that point. --[[User:Hithrael|Hithrael]] 17:32, 2 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
At 209 in weapon the creatures would have it stick on dabbling. So the end cap might be accurate. As for the bottom cap not sure, would need someone of lower level to test out against one. The Defenses of 220 would not move at all. |
|||
*You are certain that it is rather weaker than you are. (30) |
|||
Drastically slows down once evasion moved beyond 205 ranks. --[[User:Hithrael|Hithrael]] 20:44, 10 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
*You are certain that it is about as agile as you are. (30) |
|||
*You are certain that it is rather less disciplined than you are. (30) |
|||
*You are certain that it is not quite as quick to react as you are. (30) |
|||
*You are certain that it is rather less conditioned than you are. (30) |
|||
*Taking stock of its offensive abilities, and defending with a crocodile-skin buckler and a bastard sword, you are certain that the maiden's tress is definitely less skilled. |
|||
*Taking stock of its defensive abilities, and attacking with a bastard sword, you are certain that the maiden's tress is a creature completely beneath your notice. |
|||
*If you attacked with a bastard sword, you are certain that the enemy would train very poorly. (209) |
|||
*If you threw the sword at the enemy you are certain that it would train somewhat poorly. (Heavy Thrown 188) |
|||
*If you defended by parrying attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train very poorly. (220) |
|||
*If you defended by evading attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train very poorly. (220) |
|||
*If you defended by blocking attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train very poorly. (221) |
|||
*If you attempted to beguile the enemy with tactics, you are certain that it would train somewhat poorly. (171) |
|||
*If you attempted to debilitate the enemy, you are certain that it would train somewhat poorly. (203) |
|||
--[[User:FATBOY30269|FATBOY30269]] ([[User talk:FATBOY30269|talk]]) 00:52, 17 August 2015 (CDT) |
|||
Latest revision as of 17:04, 26 July 2022
Creature List
At 209 in weapon the creatures would have it stick on dabbling. So the end cap might be accurate. As for the bottom cap not sure, would need someone of lower level to test out against one. The Defenses of 220 would not move at all.
- You are certain that it is rather weaker than you are. (30)
- You are certain that it is about as agile as you are. (30)
- You are certain that it is rather less disciplined than you are. (30)
- You are certain that it is not quite as quick to react as you are. (30)
- You are certain that it is rather less conditioned than you are. (30)
- Taking stock of its offensive abilities, and defending with a crocodile-skin buckler and a bastard sword, you are certain that the maiden's tress is definitely less skilled.
- Taking stock of its defensive abilities, and attacking with a bastard sword, you are certain that the maiden's tress is a creature completely beneath your notice.
- If you attacked with a bastard sword, you are certain that the enemy would train very poorly. (209)
- If you threw the sword at the enemy you are certain that it would train somewhat poorly. (Heavy Thrown 188)
- If you defended by parrying attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train very poorly. (220)
- If you defended by evading attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train very poorly. (220)
- If you defended by blocking attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train very poorly. (221)
- If you attempted to beguile the enemy with tactics, you are certain that it would train somewhat poorly. (171)
- If you attempted to debilitate the enemy, you are certain that it would train somewhat poorly. (203)
--FATBOY30269 (talk) 00:52, 17 August 2015 (CDT)