Template talk:Enchante Detail: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: This is abominably ugly, but I can't think of a better way to do it. Suggestions? --~~~~) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is abominably ugly, but I can't think of a better way to do it. Suggestions? --[[User:Diarik|Diarik]] 03:45, 7 February 2008 (CST) |
This is abominably ugly, but I can't think of a better way to do it. Suggestions? --[[User:Diarik|Diarik]] 03:45, 7 February 2008 (CST) |
||
I agree it's really ugly. |
|||
A few suggestions: |
|||
1. Update the Enchante Template to include a Duration box beneath casting cap and a Song Structure box either above example messaging or below example messaging, with the times for each song section included in parentheses. |
|||
Structure: Intro (10 seconds), Verse (20 seconds)... |
|||
I think that will help clear things up some. I also don't think we need messaging for each song part. I think it's too much information and it doesn't read very well. |
|||
--[[User:Slowhubb|Slowhubb]] 18:06, 7 February 2008 (CST) |
|||
: Hrm, that's a good idea. I agree it's too much information, but I'm uncomfortable with cutting anything out. I'd like to leave the pulses in, so I'll probably do "Verse (20 seconds/3 pulses)" or something. --[[User:Diarik|Diarik]] 23:43, 7 February 2008 (CST) |
|||
Latest revision as of 23:43, 7 February 2008
This is abominably ugly, but I can't think of a better way to do it. Suggestions? --Diarik 03:45, 7 February 2008 (CST)
I agree it's really ugly.
A few suggestions:
1. Update the Enchante Template to include a Duration box beneath casting cap and a Song Structure box either above example messaging or below example messaging, with the times for each song section included in parentheses.
Structure: Intro (10 seconds), Verse (20 seconds)...
I think that will help clear things up some. I also don't think we need messaging for each song part. I think it's too much information and it doesn't read very well. --Slowhubb 18:06, 7 February 2008 (CST)
- Hrm, that's a good idea. I agree it's too much information, but I'm uncomfortable with cutting anything out. I'd like to leave the pulses in, so I'll probably do "Verse (20 seconds/3 pulses)" or something. --Diarik 23:43, 7 February 2008 (CST)