Category talk:Major Temples: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: It seems to me that "Major Temples" should be an article rather than a category. What type of information would one put in the articles of the Temple of Kertigen and whatnot? Now we ...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It seems to me that "Major Temples" should be an article rather than a category. What type of information would one put in the articles of the [[Temple of Kertigen]] and whatnot? Now we have a bunch of temples in the stubs category and I can't guess what would go in them that would be of value. --[[User:Kraelyst|Kraelyst]] 20:54, 7 December 2007 (CST) |
It seems to me that "Major Temples" should be an article rather than a category. What type of information would one put in the articles of the [[Temple of Kertigen]] and whatnot? Now we have a bunch of temples in the stubs category and I can't guess what would go in them that would be of value. --[[User:Kraelyst|Kraelyst]] 20:54, 7 December 2007 (CST) |
||
:I don't know, I feel the ones like Crossing Temple and Kweld Gelvdael (of Zaulfung) definitely deserve their own articles. Others may have limited notes, but I view it the same way as the geography categories. That said, I wouldn't really mind if the category was changed to an article. --[[User:Aetherie|Aetherie]] 01:33, 8 December 2007 (CST) |
|||
Latest revision as of 01:33, 8 December 2007
It seems to me that "Major Temples" should be an article rather than a category. What type of information would one put in the articles of the Temple of Kertigen and whatnot? Now we have a bunch of temples in the stubs category and I can't guess what would go in them that would be of value. --Kraelyst 20:54, 7 December 2007 (CST)
- I don't know, I feel the ones like Crossing Temple and Kweld Gelvdael (of Zaulfung) definitely deserve their own articles. Others may have limited notes, but I view it the same way as the geography categories. That said, I wouldn't really mind if the category was changed to an article. --Aetherie 01:33, 8 December 2007 (CST)