Talk:Vela'tohr bloodvine: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Created page with 'I'm thinking the cap should be lower.... unless somehow there is a Cap, and HardCap field added in for critters. At 180+, shield, MO, etc still work VERY well, but evasion has a...') |
TEVESHSZAT (talk | contribs) m (TEVESHSZAT moved page Talk:Vela'tohr Bloodvine to Talk:Vela'tohr bloodvine) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Creature Drive == |
|||
I'm thinking the cap should be lower.... unless somehow there is a Cap, and HardCap field added in for critters. |
|||
Heavy Thrown would not come off dabbling to the hard cap might be somewhere around 195 where it is set at. |
|||
At 180+, shield, MO, etc still work VERY well, but evasion has almost stopped moving at 200+. |
|||
*You are certain that it is rather weaker than you are. (30) |
|||
--[[User:Hithrael|Hithrael]] 17:34, 2 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
*You are certain that it is somewhat less agile than you are. (30) |
|||
*You are certain that it is rather less disciplined than you are. (30) |
|||
*You are certain that it is not quite as quick to react as you are. (30) |
|||
*You are certain that it is rather less conditioned than you are. (30) |
|||
*Taking stock of its offensive abilities, and defending with a crocodile-skin buckler and a bastard sword, you are certain that the vela'tohr bloodvine is a relatively easy opponent. |
|||
*Taking stock of its defensive abilities, and attacking with a bastard sword, you are certain that the vela'tohr bloodvine is a creature completely beneath your notice. |
|||
*If you attacked with a bastard sword, you are certain that the enemy would train quite badly. (30) |
|||
*If you threw the sword at the enemy you are certain that it would train very poorly. (Heavy Thrown 188) |
|||
*If you defended by parrying attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train very poorly. (220) |
|||
*If you defended by evading attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train very poorly. (220) |
|||
*If you defended by blocking attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train quite badly. (221) |
|||
*If you attempted to beguile the enemy with tactics, you are certain that it would train somewhat poorly. (171) |
|||
*If you attempted to debilitate the enemy, you are certain that it would train very poorly. (203) |
|||
--[[User:FATBOY30269|FATBOY30269]] ([[User talk:FATBOY30269|talk]]) 00:45, 17 August 2015 (CDT) |
|||
Latest revision as of 07:55, 17 October 2016
Creature Drive
Heavy Thrown would not come off dabbling to the hard cap might be somewhere around 195 where it is set at.
- You are certain that it is rather weaker than you are. (30)
- You are certain that it is somewhat less agile than you are. (30)
- You are certain that it is rather less disciplined than you are. (30)
- You are certain that it is not quite as quick to react as you are. (30)
- You are certain that it is rather less conditioned than you are. (30)
- Taking stock of its offensive abilities, and defending with a crocodile-skin buckler and a bastard sword, you are certain that the vela'tohr bloodvine is a relatively easy opponent.
- Taking stock of its defensive abilities, and attacking with a bastard sword, you are certain that the vela'tohr bloodvine is a creature completely beneath your notice.
- If you attacked with a bastard sword, you are certain that the enemy would train quite badly. (30)
- If you threw the sword at the enemy you are certain that it would train very poorly. (Heavy Thrown 188)
- If you defended by parrying attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train very poorly. (220)
- If you defended by evading attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train very poorly. (220)
- If you defended by blocking attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train quite badly. (221)
- If you attempted to beguile the enemy with tactics, you are certain that it would train somewhat poorly. (171)
- If you attempted to debilitate the enemy, you are certain that it would train very poorly. (203)
--FATBOY30269 (talk) 00:45, 17 August 2015 (CDT)