User talk:Miskton: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Thank you for your work on the visions. It's strangely a section we're rather lacking in. -~~~~") |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Thank you for your work on the visions. It's strangely a section we're rather lacking in. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon|talk]])</sup> 12:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC) |
Thank you for your work on the visions. It's strangely a section we're rather lacking in. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon|talk]])</sup> 12:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC) |
||
No problem. I started off by following the formatting that was currently there, but I'm wondering if there should be something to indicate if a vision is a one time thing, or if it's one of the recurring ones. For the recurring ones I've been giving the first date I've seen them. It may not be the first date they were actually in the game, but should be at least roughly accurate. --[[User:Miskton|Miskton]] 23:35, 12 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
: Hmmm, good idea. Let me add that. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon|talk]])</sup> 14:08, 13 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
: Added something for it, let me know if it looks funny or something goes wrong. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon|talk]])</sup> 14:13, 13 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 08:13, 13 April 2013
Thank you for your work on the visions. It's strangely a section we're rather lacking in. -Moderator Caraamon Makdasi(talk) 12:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
No problem. I started off by following the formatting that was currently there, but I'm wondering if there should be something to indicate if a vision is a one time thing, or if it's one of the recurring ones. For the recurring ones I've been giving the first date I've seen them. It may not be the first date they were actually in the game, but should be at least roughly accurate. --Miskton 23:35, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hmmm, good idea. Let me add that. -Moderator Caraamon Makdasi(talk) 14:08, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- Added something for it, let me know if it looks funny or something goes wrong. -Moderator Caraamon Makdasi(talk) 14:13, 13 April 2013 (UTC)