Talk:Giraud family: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "It's good to see clarification of House Giraud's status, but I am of the opinion the trial wasn't entirely clear about the end results. Particularly when Sebestyen asked about...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It's good to see clarification of House Giraud's status, but I am of the opinion the trial wasn't entirely clear about the end results. Particularly when Sebestyen asked about whether he could continue leading the House in its degraded, suspended state. There was never a blatant 'no' given and the Baron's reaction to the question gave the impression (to me, at least) that he had no quarrel with Sebestyen retaining the title of Lord. |
It's good to see clarification of House Giraud's status, but I am of the opinion the trial wasn't entirely clear about the end results. Particularly when Sebestyen asked about whether he could continue leading the House in its degraded, suspended state. There was never a blatant 'no' given and the Baron's reaction to the question gave the impression (to me, at least) that he had no quarrel with Sebestyen retaining the title of Lord. |
||
I'm getting the feeling these edits are in the wake of Sebestyen's recent event for Stormont. Again... Clarification is nice, but really, this just seems like an unpleasant way to twist the knife. Would have been much better IMO for the GMPCs involved in Drexella's trial to be clear in answering Sebestyen from the start. |
|||
Just my opinion, take it or leave it... It's all water under the bridge, any how. |
Just my opinion, take it or leave it... It's all water under the bridge, any how. |
||
Revision as of 04:11, 19 February 2013
It's good to see clarification of House Giraud's status, but I am of the opinion the trial wasn't entirely clear about the end results. Particularly when Sebestyen asked about whether he could continue leading the House in its degraded, suspended state. There was never a blatant 'no' given and the Baron's reaction to the question gave the impression (to me, at least) that he had no quarrel with Sebestyen retaining the title of Lord.
Just my opinion, take it or leave it... It's all water under the bridge, any how. - Talli