Talk:Mikkhalbamar: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'I saw your post on play.net, Caraamon. Judging from the root words, Mik (Large, big, etc) Khal (Stone), Bamar (tree) I would say its some sort of petrified wood from the looks o…') |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I saw your post on play.net, Caraamon. Judging from the root words, Mik (Large, big, etc) Khal (Stone), Bamar (tree) I would say its some sort of petrified wood from the looks of it. --[[User:Ysselt|Ysselt]] 13:55, 24 January 2011 (UTC) |
I saw your post on play.net, Caraamon. Judging from the root words, Mik (Large, big, etc) Khal (Stone), Bamar (tree) I would say its some sort of petrified wood from the looks of it. --[[User:Ysselt|Ysselt]] 13:55, 24 January 2011 (UTC) ETA: or maybe some sort of stone that resembles wood grain too. --[[User:Ysselt|Ysselt]] 13:56, 24 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
: Hah! We got a response! [[Post:Mikkhalbamar - 1/24/2011 - 8:46:51]] -Moderator [[User:Caraamon|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon|talk]])</sup> 14:57, 24 January 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 08:57, 24 January 2011
I saw your post on play.net, Caraamon. Judging from the root words, Mik (Large, big, etc) Khal (Stone), Bamar (tree) I would say its some sort of petrified wood from the looks of it. --Ysselt 13:55, 24 January 2011 (UTC) ETA: or maybe some sort of stone that resembles wood grain too. --Ysselt 13:56, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hah! We got a response! Post:Mikkhalbamar - 1/24/2011 - 8:46:51 -Moderator Caraamon Makdasi(talk) 14:57, 24 January 2011 (UTC)