Talk:Moonblade (2.0): Difference between revisions

From Elanthipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Old Templates==
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
| '''Shape''' || '''Class''' || '''Template''' || '''Weight w/o [[SHMO]]''' || '''Weight w/[[SHMO]]''' || '''[[SHMO]] Min Mana''' || '''Appraisal''' || '''Notes'''
|-
| Small || Light Edged || Short Sword || N/A || 12 || 21 || fair/low/poor reason/inadeq appr. suscept || Piercing
|-
| Triangular || Light Edged || Katar || N/A || 17 || 29 || dismal/fair/fair dismal/reason appr. suscept || Slashing
|-
| Normal || Medium Edged || N/A || 10 || 10|| 4|| s fair/s mod/no sup/dis very strong || Parrying
|-
| Narrow || Medium Edged || Rapier || N/A || 12 || 12|| s mod/low/dismal well/dismal mar. vuln. || Piercing
|-
| Curved || Medium Edged || Scimitar || 31 || 21 || 4 || poor/mod/low fairly/decent mar. vuln. || Slashing
|-
| Heavy || Heavy Edged || Broadsword || 35 || 24 || 4 || low/s heavy/fair fairly/decent average || Slashing
|-
| Huge || Two-handed Edged || Claymore || N/A || 45 || 29 || low/severe/heavy inadequate/soundly average || Slashing
|-
| Blunt || Quarter Staff || Quarterstaff || N/A || 34 || 37 || no/no/heavy decent/decent appr. suscept || Impact
|-
|}

==Ranks==

Need more information for appraisal values for min PM ranks.
Need more information for appraisal values for min PM ranks.


Line 12: Line 37:
<br />4. moongate (but you have to reharness the mana enable to invoke it)
<br />4. moongate (but you have to reharness the mana enable to invoke it)
<br />--[[User:Valcrest|Valcrest]] 03:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
<br />--[[User:Valcrest|Valcrest]] 03:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

== Incomplete Tag? ==
I'm not sure this needs to be tagged as incomplete for the reason you state. I've always been of the opinion that the PM requirements column in that table is redundant, since it is directly representative of the mana required to cast the spell for each level of unlock. Since this information is already included in the chart in its entirety, the PM requirement is pretty much just saying the same thing in a different way. Its just that no one has bothered to take the time to make the exact correlation between them while leveling up their PM skill. My vote would be to just remove the PM column and include a line in the notes about PM requirements to unlock all the forms. No redundancy in the table, and we still preserve all of the relevant info that way.--[[User:Evran|Evran]] 16:03, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

== New 2HE Template? ==
Anyone know what the storebought template for the sort-of-recently updated 2HE form is? I suspect its a two-handed sword template, but I won't update the table without confirmation.--[[User:Evran|Evran]] 17:22, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Also, the appraisal and weight needs to be updated too.--[[User:Evran|Evran]] 17:24, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
*I'll take a look at it tonight. [[User:Hithrael|Hithrael]] 16:57, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

== Mana Requirements ==
With 600 Arcana (or 610 LM), could shift to huge with only 25 mana, 33 for blunt. --[[User:Hithrael|Hithrael]] 16:52, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:24, 23 January 2013

Old Templates

Shape Class Template Weight w/o SHMO Weight w/SHMO SHMO Min Mana Appraisal Notes
Small Light Edged Short Sword N/A 12 21 fair/low/poor reason/inadeq appr. suscept Piercing
Triangular Light Edged Katar N/A 17 29 dismal/fair/fair dismal/reason appr. suscept Slashing
Normal Medium Edged N/A 10 10 4 s fair/s mod/no sup/dis very strong Parrying
Narrow Medium Edged Rapier N/A 12 12 s mod/low/dismal well/dismal mar. vuln. Piercing
Curved Medium Edged Scimitar 31 21 4 poor/mod/low fairly/decent mar. vuln. Slashing
Heavy Heavy Edged Broadsword 35 24 4 low/s heavy/fair fairly/decent average Slashing
Huge Two-handed Edged Claymore N/A 45 29 low/severe/heavy inadequate/soundly average Slashing
Blunt Quarter Staff Quarterstaff N/A 34 37 no/no/heavy decent/decent appr. suscept Impact

Ranks

Need more information for appraisal values for min PM ranks.

App doesn't change with PM, unless you meant something else? Reene 00:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Going for minimum ranks to get the effect. Hithrael 00:29, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


Odd notes of things i have found you can put into a moonblade:
1. moonblade
2. shadowling and shadow servant
3. SHMO (kinda nice if you ever use it)
4. moongate (but you have to reharness the mana enable to invoke it)
--Valcrest 03:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Incomplete Tag?

I'm not sure this needs to be tagged as incomplete for the reason you state. I've always been of the opinion that the PM requirements column in that table is redundant, since it is directly representative of the mana required to cast the spell for each level of unlock. Since this information is already included in the chart in its entirety, the PM requirement is pretty much just saying the same thing in a different way. Its just that no one has bothered to take the time to make the exact correlation between them while leveling up their PM skill. My vote would be to just remove the PM column and include a line in the notes about PM requirements to unlock all the forms. No redundancy in the table, and we still preserve all of the relevant info that way.--Evran 16:03, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

New 2HE Template?

Anyone know what the storebought template for the sort-of-recently updated 2HE form is? I suspect its a two-handed sword template, but I won't update the table without confirmation.--Evran 17:22, 13 July 2010 (UTC) Also, the appraisal and weight needs to be updated too.--Evran 17:24, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

  • I'll take a look at it tonight. Hithrael 16:57, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Mana Requirements

With 600 Arcana (or 610 LM), could shift to huge with only 25 mana, 33 for blunt. --Hithrael 16:52, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://elanthipedia.play.net/index.php?title=Talk:Moonblade_(2.0)&oldid=120357"