Don't forget, you can log in with your Play.net account

Talk:Armifer: Difference between revisions

From Elanthipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
| f=The Moon Mages / General Discussions - Moon Mages
| f=The Moon Mages / General Discussions - Moon Mages
| a=DR-ARMIFER
| a=DR-ARMIFER
| In retrospect, this seems like a very stupid thing to keep PAFO.
| p=In retrospect, this seems like a very stupid thing to keep PAFO.


The "average [[post relates to::Mana|Lunar mana]]," as used by [[post relates to::cambrinth]], AP, and [[post relates to::sorcery]] (but not Teleologic Sorcery, which is its own mixture) is [[post relates to::Category:Transduction Spellbook|Transduction]]. Transduction is, itself, the average output of the moons."[[post relates to::mana| ]]
The "average [[post relates to::Mana|Lunar mana]]," as used by [[post relates to::cambrinth]], AP, and [[post relates to::sorcery]] (but not Teleologic Sorcery, which is its own mixture) is [[post relates to::Category:Transduction Spellbook|Transduction]]. Transduction is, itself, the average output of the moons."[[post relates to::mana| ]]

Revision as of 19:48, 30 March 2009

Re: Analogous patterns · on 2/26/2009 5:52:14 PM 17773
In retrospect, this seems like a very stupid thing to keep PAFO.

The "average Lunar mana," as used by cambrinth, AP, and sorcery (but not Teleologic Sorcery, which is its own mixture) is Transduction. Transduction is, itself, the average output of the moons."

This message was originally posted in The Moon Mages / General Discussions - Moon Mages, by DR-ARMIFER on the play.net forums.

I think this should go into Mana, but I'm not sure since I don't know how to phrase it as IC information. -Devan 07:32, 27 February 2009 (UTC)