Talk:S'Kra Kor villager (1)

From Elanthipedia
Revision as of 09:04, 17 October 2016 by TEVESHSZAT (talk | contribs) (TEVESHSZAT moved page Talk:S'Kra Kor Villager (1) to Talk:S'Kra Kor villager (1))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

You are certain that it is definitely weaker than you are. (34)
You are certain that it is definitely less agile than you are. (32)
You are certain that it is quite a bit less disciplined than you are. (39)
You are certain that it is a great deal less quick to react than you are. (32)
You are certain that it is significantly less conditioned than you are.
Taking stock of its offensive abilities, and defending with a silversteel ceremonial shield trimmed in blackened moonsilver and a slim tyrium kaft inlaid with a dark grey Katamba's spire, you are certain that the S'Kra Kor villager is an easy opponent. (Shield = 231 Defending = 229)
Taking stock of its defensive abilities, and attacking with a slim tyrium kaft inlaid with a dark grey Katamba's spire, you are certain that the S'Kra Kor villager is a creature completely beneath your notice. (Small Edge = 277 Melee Mastery = 315)
If you attacked with a slim tyrium kaft inlaid with a dark grey Katamba's spire, you are certain that the enemy would train quite badly. (Small Edge = 277)
If you threw the kaft at the enemy you are certain that it would train quite badly. (Light Thrown = 192 Missile Mastery = 207)
If you defended by parrying attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train quite badly. (Parry = 233)
If you defended by evading attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train quite badly. (Evasion = 257)
If you defended by blocking attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train quite badly. (Shield = 231)
If you attempted to beguile the enemy with tactics, you are certain that it would train quite badly. (Tactics = 230)
If you attempted to debilitate the enemy, you are certain that it would train quite badly. (Debilitation = 188)
--HEXEDBYTHENET (talk) 18:53, 8 August 2015 (CDT)