Talk:Dragon Priest purifier

From Elanthipedia
Revision as of 02:27, 7 December 2015 by REAVER1 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "You are certain that the Dragon Priest purifier is healthy.<br/> You are certain that the Dragon Priest purifier is slightly fatigued.<br/> You are certain that it is about as...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

You are certain that the Dragon Priest purifier is healthy.
You are certain that the Dragon Priest purifier is slightly fatigued.
You are certain that it is about as strong as you are. (50)
You are certain that it is somewhat less agile than you are. (60)
You are certain that it is about as disciplined as you are. (45)
You are certain that it is about as quick to react as you are. (40)
You are certain that it is somewhat less conditioned than you are. (45)
Taking stock of its offensive abilities, and defending with a puffy-white targe sealed with protective wax and a steel broadsword, you are certain that the Dragon Priest purifier is a solid opponent.
Taking stock of its defensive abilities, and attacking with a steel broadsword, you are certain that the Dragon Priest purifier is an easy opponent.
If you attacked with a steel broadsword, you are certain that the enemy would train rather well. (331)
If you threw the broadsword at the enemy you are certain that it would train rather well. (336)
If you defended by parrying attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train acceptably. (418)
If you defended by evading attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train somewhat poorly. (482)
If you defended by blocking attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train acceptably. (399)
If you attempted to beguile the enemy with tactics, you are certain that it would train acceptably. (459)
If you targeted and cast a spell at the enemy, you are certain that it would train rather well. (379)
If you attempted to debilitate the enemy, you are certain that it would train very well, provided you can affect it. (305)
--REAVER1 (talk) 01:27, 7 December 2015 (CST)