Post:Redeemed Necromancers - 07/04/2020 - 03:51: Difference between revisions

From Elanthipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Post |a=DR-GREJUVA |t=Redeemed Necromancers |d=07/04/2020 03:51 |n=2258 |f=The Necromancers / Responses to GM and Official Announcements |c=m,d |p=''>>What about Butchery? I...")
 
m (links)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
|f=The Necromancers / Responses to GM and Official Announcements
|f=The Necromancers / Responses to GM and Official Announcements
|c=m,d
|c=m,d
|p=''>>What about Butchery? It does not currently generate Divine Outrage (intentional or not) and can be an excellent Thanatology trainer. Yes, using the parts would be bad, but I can see merit as sort of an “advanced dissection” method. Should Butchery be generating DO?''
|p=''>>What about [[Butchery ritual|Butchery]]? It does not currently generate Divine Outrage (intentional or not) and can be an excellent Thanatology trainer. Yes, using the parts would be bad, but I can see merit as sort of an “advanced dissection” method. Should Butchery be generating DO?''


Anything [[Risen]]-related will generate some DO, even if it didn't before.
Anything [[Risen]]-related will generate some DO, even if it didn't before.


''>>Based on my reading of the chart there’s no Life mixed in.''
''>>Based on my reading of [[Sorcery#True_Sorcery|the chart]] there’s no Life mixed in.''


Correct. Holy+Lunar and Holy+Elemental are both possible within Anabasis, though it doesn't matter mechanically.
Correct. Holy+Lunar and Holy+Elemental are both possible within [[Anabasis]], though it doesn't matter mechanically.


''>>Anabasis aside, does the [[Sorcery#Sorcerous_Backlash|sorcerous backlash risk]] when casting Holy spells remain in the “Most Dangerous” bucket for Redeemed?''
''>>Anabasis aside, does the [[Sorcery#Sorcerous_Backlash|sorcerous backlash risk]] when casting Holy spells remain in the “Most Dangerous” bucket for Redeemed?''
Line 19: Line 19:


GM [[Grejuva]]
GM [[Grejuva]]
|sub=Divine outrage, Butchery, Thanatological rituals, Sorcery, Sorcery skill, Sorcerous Backlash, Redeemed, Necromancer, Risen,
|sub=Divine outrage, Butchery, Thanatological rituals, Sorcery, Sorcery skill, Sorcerous Backlash, Redeemed, Necromancer, Risen, Thanatology skill, Butchery ritual,
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 11:19, 13 July 2020

Redeemed Necromancers · on 07/04/2020 03:51 2258
>>What about Butchery? It does not currently generate Divine Outrage (intentional or not) and can be an excellent Thanatology trainer. Yes, using the parts would be bad, but I can see merit as sort of an “advanced dissection” method. Should Butchery be generating DO?

Anything Risen-related will generate some DO, even if it didn't before.

>>Based on my reading of the chart there’s no Life mixed in.

Correct. Holy+Lunar and Holy+Elemental are both possible within Anabasis, though it doesn't matter mechanically.

>>Anabasis aside, does the sorcerous backlash risk when casting Holy spells remain in the “Most Dangerous” bucket for Redeemed?

No. For unsullied and Redeemed, Holy magic difficulty and danger are the same as other non-Arcane magic.

GM Grejuva

This message was originally posted in The Necromancers / Responses to GM and Official Announcements, by DR-GREJUVA on the play.net forums.
Retrieved from "https://elanthipedia.play.net/index.php?title=Post:Redeemed_Necromancers_-_07/04/2020_-_03:51&oldid=524351"