elanthipedia:Town Green (miscellaneous) - Revision history

WINTERSTORM: /* Clans & such for the other races */ new section

2017-10-11T07:03:22Z

Clans & such for the other races: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:03, 11 October 2017
Line 230:		Line 230:

	: We've already got systems in place, but there's a limit to what we can do. From what I can tell, these aren't automated bots, but actual people with waaay to much time. I'd rather have to delete spammers, than make other people feel unwanted. It's just the price of business. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 21:51, 19 August 2011 (UTC)		: We've already got systems in place, but there's a limit to what we can do. From what I can tell, these aren't automated bots, but actual people with waaay to much time. I'd rather have to delete spammers, than make other people feel unwanted. It's just the price of business. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 21:51, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

			== Clans & such for the other races ==

			Okay, so the S'kra have their Sraans, Eloths their "Houses" & Elves their Clans.

			So, TIL that humans also have their clans, course Dwarves do too, Raks have packs, Prys have prides(?), not sure about togs, halfs, gnomes. Kaldars?

			So, would it be considered rude if we added the clans, packs, prides, etc for the different races?

			I know some of the elves have sorted themselves, eloths & s'kras no so much. So maybe those in charge feel that new additions wont get much traffic?

			Personally I like the idea, I play a few non s'kra that will be sorting themselves into whatever they need too.



			And in the end I'm hoping I got this in the right spot, wasnt sure but thought this was the best spot. Forgive me if I'm wrong, its late & I cant sleep when I need too.
			[[User:WINTERSTORM\|WINTERSTORM]] ([[User talk:WINTERSTORM\|talk]]) 02:03, 11 October 2017 (CDT)

Maintenance script at 15:55, 4 March 2013

2013-03-04T15:55:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:55, 4 March 2013
Line 221:		Line 221:

	I made a new template that should help us manage the big switch. This template is for articles that are still correct but contain old terminology that has been changed for DR 3.0, eg skill names etc. --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 11:33, 19 January 2013 (UTC)		I made a new template that should help us manage the big switch. This template is for articles that are still correct but contain old terminology that has been changed for DR 3.0, eg skill names etc. --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 11:33, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

			==Spam==
			Why are all these idiots attacking elanthipedia with their spam?

			I know it would be tedious for the mods, but would there be a way to setup an approval type system after someone submits an application to join the wiki? Something that just says which game they play (prime, plat, fallen), what character and class they play, and maybe what topics they'd be interested in helping develop...and then you could grant them access. --[[User:Pathian\|Pathian]] 19:53, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

			Great, now there are Swedish spammers too. --[[User:Hithrael\|Hithrael]] 05:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

			: We've already got systems in place, but there's a limit to what we can do. From what I can tell, these aren't automated bots, but actual people with waaay to much time. I'd rather have to delete spammers, than make other people feel unwanted. It's just the price of business. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 21:51, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Maintenance script: /* New template {{tlink|UpdateDR3}} */ new section

2013-01-19T11:33:29Z

New template {{tlink|UpdateDR3}}: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:33, 19 January 2013
Line 217:		Line 217:

	Thanks dude! --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 02:45, 9 December 2012 (UTC)		Thanks dude! --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 02:45, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

			== New template {{tlink\|UpdateDR3}} ==

			I made a new template that should help us manage the big switch. This template is for articles that are still correct but contain old terminology that has been changed for DR 3.0, eg skill names etc. --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 11:33, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Maintenance script: /* New template {{tlink|Obsolete}} */

2012-12-09T02:45:29Z

New template {{tlink|Obsolete}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:45, 8 December 2012
Line 215:		Line 215:
	I updated {{tlink\|Spell}} to mark spells having status = "obsolete" with {{tlink\|Obsolete}}. Much to my surprise, I don't think I messed it up! --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 23:45, 8 December 2012 (UTC)		I updated {{tlink\|Spell}} to mark spells having status = "obsolete" with {{tlink\|Obsolete}}. Much to my surprise, I don't think I messed it up! --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 23:45, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
	: Good addition, and nice work. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 23:47, 8 December 2012 (UTC)		: Good addition, and nice work. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 23:47, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

			Thanks dude! --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 02:45, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

CARAAMON at 23:47, 8 December 2012

2012-12-08T23:47:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:47, 8 December 2012
Line 214:		Line 214:

	I updated {{tlink\|Spell}} to mark spells having status = "obsolete" with {{tlink\|Obsolete}}. Much to my surprise, I don't think I messed it up! --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 23:45, 8 December 2012 (UTC)		I updated {{tlink\|Spell}} to mark spells having status = "obsolete" with {{tlink\|Obsolete}}. Much to my surprise, I don't think I messed it up! --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 23:45, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
			: Good addition, and nice work. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 23:47, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Maintenance script: /* New template {{tlink|Obsolete}} */

2012-12-08T23:45:41Z

New template {{tlink|Obsolete}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:45, 8 December 2012
Line 212:		Line 212:

	I made a new template and associated [[:Category:Obsolete Articles\|category]] for marking obsolete articles. This could be useful if we want to retain articles on cancelled spells, etc. --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 22:47, 8 December 2012 (UTC)		I made a new template and associated [[:Category:Obsolete Articles\|category]] for marking obsolete articles. This could be useful if we want to retain articles on cancelled spells, etc. --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 22:47, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

			I updated {{tlink\|Spell}} to mark spells having status = "obsolete" with {{tlink\|Obsolete}}. Much to my surprise, I don't think I messed it up! --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 23:45, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Maintenance script: /* New template {{tlink|Obsolete}} */ new section

2012-12-08T22:47:38Z

New template {{tlink|Obsolete}}: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:47, 8 December 2012
Line 208:		Line 208:

	I spent a good bit of coin at Uwresari's as gems are my favorite thing and I want to know if I should use those appraisals to fill out the gem tables or not. I'm not sure if they are outside the normal realm of gems and are artificially inflated for the festival.		I spent a good bit of coin at Uwresari's as gems are my favorite thing and I want to know if I should use those appraisals to fill out the gem tables or not. I'm not sure if they are outside the normal realm of gems and are artificially inflated for the festival.

			== New template {{tlink\|Obsolete}} ==

			I made a new template and associated [[:Category:Obsolete Articles\|category]] for marking obsolete articles. This could be useful if we want to retain articles on cancelled spells, etc. --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 22:47, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Maintenance script: /* Editing Gem Tables */ new section

2012-11-04T13:48:22Z

Editing Gem Tables: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:48, 4 November 2012
Line 204:		Line 204:

	It would be great if somehad had the information from Kraelysts old travel section on boat information to put it up on here. There isn't much about boats. Unfortunately I didn't copy it all out, or I would. There was an abundance of boat information on his old site.		It would be great if somehad had the information from Kraelysts old travel section on boat information to put it up on here. There isn't much about boats. Unfortunately I didn't copy it all out, or I would. There was an abundance of boat information on his old site.

			== Editing Gem Tables ==

			I spent a good bit of coin at Uwresari's as gems are my favorite thing and I want to know if I should use those appraisals to fill out the gem tables or not. I'm not sure if they are outside the normal realm of gems and are artificially inflated for the festival.

Maintenance script: /* Boats */ new section

2012-01-31T15:53:52Z

Boats: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:53, 31 January 2012
Line 200:		Line 200:
	::: If you don't enter a map number or disable it with "-" it will consider it incomplete. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 20:02, 1 July 2011 (UTC)		::: If you don't enter a map number or disable it with "-" it will consider it incomplete. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 20:02, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
	::::Oh gosh, well that solves it. Thanks. -[[User:The Ginger\|The Ginger]] 20:10, 1 July 2011 (UTC)		::::Oh gosh, well that solves it. Thanks. -[[User:The Ginger\|The Ginger]] 20:10, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

			== Boats ==

			It would be great if somehad had the information from Kraelysts old travel section on boat information to put it up on here. There isn't much about boats. Unfortunately I didn't copy it all out, or I would. There was an abundance of boat information on his old site.

Maintenance script: /* Add a "historical" option to NPC template? */

2011-07-01T20:10:35Z

Add a "historical" option to NPC template?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:10, 1 July 2011
Line 199:		Line 199:
	:: I edited [[Adinax]] to give it a try and it's still flagging as incomplete even after changing the status to historical. Is that caused by something in the NPC template or is it something else I'm not seeing? - [[User:The Ginger\|The Ginger]] 19:59, 1 July 2011 (UTC)		:: I edited [[Adinax]] to give it a try and it's still flagging as incomplete even after changing the status to historical. Is that caused by something in the NPC template or is it something else I'm not seeing? - [[User:The Ginger\|The Ginger]] 19:59, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
	::: If you don't enter a map number or disable it with "-" it will consider it incomplete. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 20:02, 1 July 2011 (UTC)		::: If you don't enter a map number or disable it with "-" it will consider it incomplete. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 20:02, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
			::::Oh gosh, well that solves it. Thanks. -[[User:The Ginger\|The Ginger]] 20:10, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:45, 8 December 2012
Line 215:		Line 215:
	I updated {{tlink\|Spell}} to mark spells having status = "obsolete" with {{tlink\|Obsolete}}. Much to my surprise, I don't think I messed it up! --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 23:45, 8 December 2012 (UTC)		I updated {{tlink\|Spell}} to mark spells having status = "obsolete" with {{tlink\|Obsolete}}. Much to my surprise, I don't think I messed it up! --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 23:45, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
	: Good addition, and nice work. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 23:47, 8 December 2012 (UTC)		: Good addition, and nice work. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 23:47, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

			Thanks dude! --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 02:45, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:10, 1 July 2011
Line 199:		Line 199:
	:: I edited [[Adinax]] to give it a try and it's still flagging as incomplete even after changing the status to historical. Is that caused by something in the NPC template or is it something else I'm not seeing? - [[User:The Ginger\|The Ginger]] 19:59, 1 July 2011 (UTC)		:: I edited [[Adinax]] to give it a try and it's still flagging as incomplete even after changing the status to historical. Is that caused by something in the NPC template or is it something else I'm not seeing? - [[User:The Ginger\|The Ginger]] 19:59, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
	::: If you don't enter a map number or disable it with "-" it will consider it incomplete. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 20:02, 1 July 2011 (UTC)		::: If you don't enter a map number or disable it with "-" it will consider it incomplete. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 20:02, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
			::::Oh gosh, well that solves it. Thanks. -[[User:The Ginger\|The Ginger]] 20:10, 1 July 2011 (UTC)