User talk:Mozzik - Revision history

Maintenance script: /* Spell Trees */

2010-01-01T12:39:11Z

Spell Trees

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:39, 1 January 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:

	I was going to clean up the guild pages some to try and make them more uniform - I moved the tree so the main pages since in updating them I found out just how incredibly inconsistent the linking was to each (It was sorta whack a mole which link lead to it, and sometimes buried several deep), and figure it's sort of the basic information I'd want at a glance for a guild. I'm open to either solution however. --[[User:Mozzik\|Mozzik]] 21:06, 31 December 2009 (UTC)		I was going to clean up the guild pages some to try and make them more uniform - I moved the tree so the main pages since in updating them I found out just how incredibly inconsistent the linking was to each (It was sorta whack a mole which link lead to it, and sometimes buried several deep), and figure it's sort of the basic information I'd want at a glance for a guild. I'm open to either solution however. --[[User:Mozzik\|Mozzik]] 21:06, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

			Just wanted to say Hello and great job on the spell trees. I love them. Great job! --[[User:Zamara\|Zamara]] 12:39, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Maintenance script at 21:06, 31 December 2009

2009-12-31T21:06:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:06, 31 December 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Spell Trees=		=Spell Trees=
	Nice job on updating/creating the spell trees. On the guild pages it seems redundant to have a link to the spell category (which includes the spell tree) followed by the spell tree itself. I say we leave them where they were since it's easy enough to click on the guild spell category link to access the tree. This also keeps the clutter on the guild overview pages to a minimum so they don't become the nightmare that the Necromancer page used to be. Thoughts? --[[User:Thilan\|Thilan]] 15:01, 31 December 2009 (UTC)		Nice job on updating/creating the spell trees. On the guild pages it seems redundant to have a link to the spell category (which includes the spell tree) followed by the spell tree itself. I say we leave them where they were since it's easy enough to click on the guild spell category link to access the tree. This also keeps the clutter on the guild overview pages to a minimum so they don't become the nightmare that the Necromancer page used to be. Thoughts? --[[User:Thilan\|Thilan]] 15:01, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

			I was going to clean up the guild pages some to try and make them more uniform - I moved the tree so the main pages since in updating them I found out just how incredibly inconsistent the linking was to each (It was sorta whack a mole which link lead to it, and sometimes buried several deep), and figure it's sort of the basic information I'd want at a glance for a guild. I'm open to either solution however. --[[User:Mozzik\|Mozzik]] 21:06, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Maintenance script: Created page with '=Spell Trees= Nice job on updating/creating the spell trees. On the guild pages it seems redundant to have a link to the spell category (which includes the spell tree) followed ...'

2009-12-31T15:01:25Z

Created page with '=Spell Trees= Nice job on updating/creating the spell trees. On the guild pages it seems redundant to have a link to the spell category (which includes the spell tree) followed ...'

New page

=Spell Trees=
Nice job on updating/creating the spell trees. On the guild pages it seems redundant to have a link to the spell category (which includes the spell tree) followed by the spell tree itself. I say we leave them where they were since it's easy enough to click on the guild spell category link to access the tree. This also keeps the clutter on the guild overview pages to a minimum so they don't become the nightmare that the Necromancer page used to be. Thoughts? --[[User:Thilan|Thilan]] 15:01, 31 December 2009 (UTC)