User talk:Juugcatm - Revision history

JUUGCATM: Undo revision 263957 by Juugcatm (talk)

2013-10-23T15:39:11Z

Undo revision 263957 by Juugcatm (talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:39, 23 October 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Crafted items and semantic search==
	So I recently created a specific item page for the ribbed cougar-bone aventail becuase I was interested specifically in that item as a whole. It's both a "ribbed aventail" recipe, but also made of cougar bone material. So I was making an effort to create a generic "ribbed aventail" recipe page that would use a semantic query to fill out all the different bone types from their armor items. For example, the "ribbed cougar-bone aventail" and the "ribbed rat-bone aventail", etc. would all show up there. I see that you redirected the page away from the specific item and back to the recipe's page, but that defeats my goals. I was hoping these crafted items could show up in armor queries. Do you have a plan for how to represent crafted items that you can explain to me so I don't keep stepping on peoples' toes? [[User:Juugcatm\|Juugcatm]] 15:37, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

	==Item Sources==		==Item Sources==

JUUGCATM at 15:37, 23 October 2013

2013-10-23T15:37:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:37, 23 October 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==Crafted items and semantic search==
			So I recently created a specific item page for the ribbed cougar-bone aventail becuase I was interested specifically in that item as a whole. It's both a "ribbed aventail" recipe, but also made of cougar bone material. So I was making an effort to create a generic "ribbed aventail" recipe page that would use a semantic query to fill out all the different bone types from their armor items. For example, the "ribbed cougar-bone aventail" and the "ribbed rat-bone aventail", etc. would all show up there. I see that you redirected the page away from the specific item and back to the recipe's page, but that defeats my goals. I was hoping these crafted items could show up in armor queries. Do you have a plan for how to represent crafted items that you can explain to me so I don't keep stepping on peoples' toes? [[User:Juugcatm\|Juugcatm]] 15:37, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

	==Item Sources==		==Item Sources==

Maintenance script: /* Anatomy Charts */

2011-07-17T05:10:29Z

Anatomy Charts

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:10, 17 July 2011
Line 19:		Line 19:

	:: Ok, as long as it's going to be re-added, that's great. I've referenced the scholarship requirements several times, personally.[[User:The Ginger\|The Ginger]] 23:04, 18 May 2011 (UTC)		:: Ok, as long as it's going to be re-added, that's great. I've referenced the scholarship requirements several times, personally.[[User:The Ginger\|The Ginger]] 23:04, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

			I'm not sure the numbers you have are correct, silver leucro charts should be able to be read at an average of 30 ranks between first aid and scholarship (i.e. 15 each), it is not just based on scholarship unless something has changed since I played last year. -[[User:Tea\|Tea]] 05:10, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Maintenance script: /* Anatomy Charts */

2011-05-18T23:04:31Z

Anatomy Charts

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:04, 18 May 2011
Line 17:		Line 17:
	[[User:The Ginger\|The Ginger]] 22:29, 18 May 2011 (UTC)		[[User:The Ginger\|The Ginger]] 22:29, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
	: It's a work in progress. I'm planning on adding a "scholarship required" property to all the anatomy charts that were listed before. Once that's done the scholarship requirements will be shown. They're saved in the page's history if people need to reference them until I have a chance to finish it. [[User:Juugcatm\|Juugcatm]] 22:34, 18 May 2011 (UTC)		: It's a work in progress. I'm planning on adding a "scholarship required" property to all the anatomy charts that were listed before. Once that's done the scholarship requirements will be shown. They're saved in the page's history if people need to reference them until I have a chance to finish it. [[User:Juugcatm\|Juugcatm]] 22:34, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

			:: Ok, as long as it's going to be re-added, that's great. I've referenced the scholarship requirements several times, personally.[[User:The Ginger\|The Ginger]] 23:04, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

JUUGCATM at 22:34, 18 May 2011

2011-05-18T22:34:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:34, 18 May 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:
	I'm curious why you removed the scholarship requirements from the [[Anatomy Charts]] page?. Other than that, I like what you did with it.		I'm curious why you removed the scholarship requirements from the [[Anatomy Charts]] page?. Other than that, I like what you did with it.
	[[User:The Ginger\|The Ginger]] 22:29, 18 May 2011 (UTC)		[[User:The Ginger\|The Ginger]] 22:29, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
			: It's a work in progress. I'm planning on adding a "scholarship required" property to all the anatomy charts that were listed before. Once that's done the scholarship requirements will be shown. They're saved in the page's history if people need to reference them until I have a chance to finish it. [[User:Juugcatm\|Juugcatm]] 22:34, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Maintenance script: /* Anatomy Charts */ new section

2011-05-18T22:29:39Z

Anatomy Charts: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:29, 18 May 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:After you posted this I did some research into the templates and on Semantic Wiki extensions. I see all the tags for "is combat type" so it seems like everything is already in place. Why do Spineripper and Blight Fist work with those properties while all the other weapons are unlisted? I see that those items use the weapon template just like all the other weapons. --[[User:Juugcatm\|Juugcatm]] 06:12, 9 May 2009 (UTC)		:After you posted this I did some research into the templates and on Semantic Wiki extensions. I see all the tags for "is combat type" so it seems like everything is already in place. Why do Spineripper and Blight Fist work with those properties while all the other weapons are unlisted? I see that those items use the weapon template just like all the other weapons. --[[User:Juugcatm\|Juugcatm]] 06:12, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
	:: As I said, for reasons the staff have been trying to determine for well over a month, SemanticWiki just stopped functioning. But it will be up "soon." -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 06:44, 9 May 2009 (UTC)		:: As I said, for reasons the staff have been trying to determine for well over a month, SemanticWiki just stopped functioning. But it will be up "soon." -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 06:44, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

			== Anatomy Charts ==

			I'm curious why you removed the scholarship requirements from the [[Anatomy Charts]] page?. Other than that, I like what you did with it.
			[[User:The Ginger\|The Ginger]] 22:29, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

ISHARON at 03:29, 13 May 2011

2011-05-13T03:29:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:29, 12 May 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==Item Sources==

			Thanks for adding items from the [[Paladin's Guild, Emporium]]! A couple of requests:
			*Don't forget to add the item source and cost. If you don't remember, click "What links here" in the left-hand toolbox.
			*If these are new appraisals (October 2010 or later), check the "New Appraisal?" box.
			Thanks! ----[[User:Isharon\|Isharon]] 03:29, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

	==Weapon/Armor Categorization Efforts==		==Weapon/Armor Categorization Efforts==
	While we appreciate these and will keep them for now, keep in mind that we're attempting to transition to the use of Semantic tags (which are broken right now) rather than categories. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 01:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)		While we appreciate these and will keep them for now, keep in mind that we're attempting to transition to the use of Semantic tags (which are broken right now) rather than categories. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 01:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

CARAAMON: /* Weapon/Armor Categorization Efforts */

2009-05-09T06:44:11Z

Weapon/Armor Categorization Efforts

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:44, 9 May 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:

	:After you posted this I did some research into the templates and on Semantic Wiki extensions. I see all the tags for "is combat type" so it seems like everything is already in place. Why do Spineripper and Blight Fist work with those properties while all the other weapons are unlisted? I see that those items use the weapon template just like all the other weapons. --[[User:Juugcatm\|Juugcatm]] 06:12, 9 May 2009 (UTC)		:After you posted this I did some research into the templates and on Semantic Wiki extensions. I see all the tags for "is combat type" so it seems like everything is already in place. Why do Spineripper and Blight Fist work with those properties while all the other weapons are unlisted? I see that those items use the weapon template just like all the other weapons. --[[User:Juugcatm\|Juugcatm]] 06:12, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
			:: As I said, for reasons the staff have been trying to determine for well over a month, SemanticWiki just stopped functioning. But it will be up "soon." -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 06:44, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

JUUGCATM: /* Weapon/Armor Categorization Efforts */

2009-05-09T06:12:31Z

Weapon/Armor Categorization Efforts

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:12, 9 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Weapon/Armor Categorization Efforts==		==Weapon/Armor Categorization Efforts==
	While we appreciate these and will keep them for now, keep in mind that we're attempting to transition to the use of Semantic tags (which are broken right now) rather than categories. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 01:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)		While we appreciate these and will keep them for now, keep in mind that we're attempting to transition to the use of Semantic tags (which are broken right now) rather than categories. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 01:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

			:After you posted this I did some research into the templates and on Semantic Wiki extensions. I see all the tags for "is combat type" so it seems like everything is already in place. Why do Spineripper and Blight Fist work with those properties while all the other weapons are unlisted? I see that those items use the weapon template just like all the other weapons. --[[User:Juugcatm\|Juugcatm]] 06:12, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

CARAAMON: Created page with '==Weapon/Armor Categorization Efforts== While we appreciate these and will keep them for now, keep in mind that we're attempting to transition to the use of Semantic tags (which ...'

2009-05-09T01:29:19Z

Created page with '==Weapon/Armor Categorization Efforts== While we appreciate these and will keep them for now, keep in mind that we're attempting to transition to the use of Semantic tags (which ...'

New page

==Weapon/Armor Categorization Efforts==
While we appreciate these and will keep them for now, keep in mind that we're attempting to transition to the use of Semantic tags (which are broken right now) rather than categories. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon|talk]])</sup> 01:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:04, 18 May 2011
Line 17:		Line 17:
	[[User:The Ginger\|The Ginger]] 22:29, 18 May 2011 (UTC)		[[User:The Ginger\|The Ginger]] 22:29, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
	: It's a work in progress. I'm planning on adding a "scholarship required" property to all the anatomy charts that were listed before. Once that's done the scholarship requirements will be shown. They're saved in the page's history if people need to reference them until I have a chance to finish it. [[User:Juugcatm\|Juugcatm]] 22:34, 18 May 2011 (UTC)		: It's a work in progress. I'm planning on adding a "scholarship required" property to all the anatomy charts that were listed before. Once that's done the scholarship requirements will be shown. They're saved in the page's history if people need to reference them until I have a chance to finish it. [[User:Juugcatm\|Juugcatm]] 22:34, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

			:: Ok, as long as it's going to be re-added, that's great. I've referenced the scholarship requirements several times, personally.[[User:The Ginger\|The Ginger]] 23:04, 18 May 2011 (UTC)