User talk:Glimmereyes - Revision history

TEVESHSZAT: /* Get the violators! */ new section

2012-10-18T16:35:19Z

Get the violators!: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:35, 18 October 2012
Line 81:		Line 81:

	I second the unsigned above. Very nice job on these maps! - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 16:28, 16 February 2011 (UTC)		I second the unsigned above. Very nice job on these maps! - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 16:28, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

			== Get the violators! ==

			DIE SPAM ACCOUNTS, DIEEEEEEEEE --[[User:TEVESHSZAT\|TEVESHSZAT]] 16:35, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

ISHARON at 05:14, 29 August 2011

2011-08-29T05:14:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:14, 29 August 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	==Item Pages and Links==		==Item Pages and Links==

	If the first word in an item name is "some," please omit that when creating item pages or links. According to [[Elanthipedia:Manual of Style/Items]], the leading articles, ''a'', ''an'', ''some'', and ''the'' are not included in the page name or name= field. Quantities (for example, "pair of" and "set of") are included, however. Thanks! --[[User:Isharon\|Isharon]] 18:43, 28 August 2011 (UTC)		If the first word in an item name is "some," please omit that when creating item pages or links. Thanks! --[[User:Isharon\|Isharon]] 18:43, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

	== Shops ==		== Shops ==

ISHARON at 18:43, 28 August 2011

2011-08-28T18:43:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:43, 28 August 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Nice work on the guild articles! --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 09:58, 26 March 2007 (CDT)		Nice work on the guild articles! --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 09:58, 26 March 2007 (CDT)

			==Item Pages and Links==

			If the first word in an item name is "some," please omit that when creating item pages or links. According to [[Elanthipedia:Manual of Style/Items]], the leading articles, ''a'', ''an'', ''some'', and ''the'' are not included in the page name or name= field. Quantities (for example, "pair of" and "set of") are included, however. Thanks! --[[User:Isharon\|Isharon]] 18:43, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

	== Shops ==		== Shops ==

HRODBERACHT: /* Muspar'i Trade Road Map */

2011-02-16T16:28:47Z

Muspar'i Trade Road Map

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:28, 16 February 2011
Line 75:		Line 75:

	Thank you very much for updating these maps! It's greatly appreciated.		Thank you very much for updating these maps! It's greatly appreciated.

			I second the unsigned above. Very nice job on these maps! - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 16:28, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Maintenance script: /* Muspar'i Trade Road Map */ new section

2010-11-10T21:18:24Z

Muspar'i Trade Road Map: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:18, 10 November 2010
Line 71:		Line 71:

	<br> Yeah, no problem, I actually wasn't sure what to use, I cut and paste an item from some other store and it was "t=c". I realized a was for armor and w was for weapons but I wasn't sure what to use for other stuff. I'll check out the template you linked for next time, thanks.--[[User:Khelek\|Khelek]] 08:21, 1 November 2009 (UTC)		<br> Yeah, no problem, I actually wasn't sure what to use, I cut and paste an item from some other store and it was "t=c". I realized a was for armor and w was for weapons but I wasn't sure what to use for other stuff. I'll check out the template you linked for next time, thanks.--[[User:Khelek\|Khelek]] 08:21, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

			== Muspar'i Trade Road Map ==

			Thank you very much for updating these maps! It's greatly appreciated.

KHELEK at 08:21, 1 November 2009

2009-11-01T08:21:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:21, 1 November 2009
Line 67:		Line 67:
	Thanks for the fix on naming for the Skinning knives. I wasn't sure how to approach that, but I'll try to remember the (1) / (2) in the future.		Thanks for the fix on naming for the Skinning knives. I wasn't sure how to approach that, but I'll try to remember the (1) / (2) in the future.
	:The GMs are usually pretty good about not reusing names so not a big worry, but sometimes they like to throw us a curve ball.<br>-[[User:Glimmereyes\|Glimmereyes]] 17:32, 21 October 2009 (UTC)		:The GMs are usually pretty good about not reusing names so not a big worry, but sometimes they like to throw us a curve ball.<br>-[[User:Glimmereyes\|Glimmereyes]] 17:32, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

			== Item Template ==

			<br> Yeah, no problem, I actually wasn't sure what to use, I cut and paste an item from some other store and it was "t=c". I realized a was for armor and w was for weapons but I wasn't sure what to use for other stuff. I'll check out the template you linked for next time, thanks.--[[User:Khelek\|Khelek]] 08:21, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Maintenance script: /* Skinning Knife Fix */

2009-10-21T17:32:58Z

Skinning Knife Fix

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:32, 21 October 2009
Line 66:		Line 66:

	Thanks for the fix on naming for the Skinning knives. I wasn't sure how to approach that, but I'll try to remember the (1) / (2) in the future.		Thanks for the fix on naming for the Skinning knives. I wasn't sure how to approach that, but I'll try to remember the (1) / (2) in the future.
			:The GMs are usually pretty good about not reusing names so not a big worry, but sometimes they like to throw us a curve ball.<br>-[[User:Glimmereyes\|Glimmereyes]] 17:32, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Maintenance script: /* Skinning Knife Fix */ new section

2009-10-21T16:20:54Z

Skinning Knife Fix: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:20, 21 October 2009
Line 62:		Line 62:
	:Oh ya, and thanks.-Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 23:48, 26 February 2009 (UTC)		:Oh ya, and thanks.-Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 23:48, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
	::It's a break from cleaning out the Concept name space and adding all the food items I've gathered. Mmm, tedium ;)<br>-[[User:Glimmereyes\|Glimmereyes]] 00:03, 27 February 2009 (UTC)		::It's a break from cleaning out the Concept name space and adding all the food items I've gathered. Mmm, tedium ;)<br>-[[User:Glimmereyes\|Glimmereyes]] 00:03, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

			== Skinning Knife Fix ==

			Thanks for the fix on naming for the Skinning knives. I wasn't sure how to approach that, but I'll try to remember the (1) / (2) in the future.

Maintenance script at 16:10, 5 April 2009

2009-04-05T16:10:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:10, 5 April 2009
Line 33:		Line 33:
	::Looks good, just [[SOS]] should be yellow since it's in the [[:Category:Holy Defense Spellbook\|Holy Defense spellbook]] and [[Sanctify Pattern]] was just released so should be added. It's a [[:Category:Second Tier Spells\|second tier]] [[:Category:Holy Enchantments Spellbook\|Holy Enchantments spell]] with [[Bless]] as a prereq, so it could fit right between [[HOT]] and [[DR]]. Again, awesome job -- I wish I had a clue about editing (even the link Naeya gave me mystified me) so I wouldn't have to bother you! --[[User:Thilan\|Thilan]] 16:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)		::Looks good, just [[SOS]] should be yellow since it's in the [[:Category:Holy Defense Spellbook\|Holy Defense spellbook]] and [[Sanctify Pattern]] was just released so should be added. It's a [[:Category:Second Tier Spells\|second tier]] [[:Category:Holy Enchantments Spellbook\|Holy Enchantments spell]] with [[Bless]] as a prereq, so it could fit right between [[HOT]] and [[DR]]. Again, awesome job -- I wish I had a clue about editing (even the link Naeya gave me mystified me) so I wouldn't have to bother you! --[[User:Thilan\|Thilan]] 16:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
	:If you're working on a new image to include FoU, then SoS should be changed to yellow since it's a Holy Defense spell and not Spirit Manipulation. Nice job keeping on top of it. --[[User:Thilan\|thilan]] 15:02, 5 April 2009 (UTC)		:If you're working on a new image to include FoU, then SoS should be changed to yellow since it's a Holy Defense spell and not Spirit Manipulation. Nice job keeping on top of it. --[[User:Thilan\|thilan]] 15:02, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
			::Could have sworn I did that already. Must have uploaded an older copy when I changed it prevously.<br>-[[User:Glimmereyes\|Glimmereyes]] 16:10, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

	== Sysop nomination ==		== Sysop nomination ==

Maintenance script: /* Cleric Spell Tree */

2009-04-05T15:02:33Z

Cleric Spell Tree

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:02, 5 April 2009
Line 32:		Line 32:
	:Hey, just a few other things that I didn't notice earlier -- OM is required for AO, not Reve, Vigil is required for AE in addition to DR and Bene requires Bless in addition to MaPP. I can't figure out a way to make the last two fit into the chart, so maybe just footnote AE & Bene. --[[User:Thilan\|Thilan]] 05:08, 25 December 2008 (UTC)		:Hey, just a few other things that I didn't notice earlier -- OM is required for AO, not Reve, Vigil is required for AE in addition to DR and Bene requires Bless in addition to MaPP. I can't figure out a way to make the last two fit into the chart, so maybe just footnote AE & Bene. --[[User:Thilan\|Thilan]] 05:08, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
	::Looks good, just [[SOS]] should be yellow since it's in the [[:Category:Holy Defense Spellbook\|Holy Defense spellbook]] and [[Sanctify Pattern]] was just released so should be added. It's a [[:Category:Second Tier Spells\|second tier]] [[:Category:Holy Enchantments Spellbook\|Holy Enchantments spell]] with [[Bless]] as a prereq, so it could fit right between [[HOT]] and [[DR]]. Again, awesome job -- I wish I had a clue about editing (even the link Naeya gave me mystified me) so I wouldn't have to bother you! --[[User:Thilan\|Thilan]] 16:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)		::Looks good, just [[SOS]] should be yellow since it's in the [[:Category:Holy Defense Spellbook\|Holy Defense spellbook]] and [[Sanctify Pattern]] was just released so should be added. It's a [[:Category:Second Tier Spells\|second tier]] [[:Category:Holy Enchantments Spellbook\|Holy Enchantments spell]] with [[Bless]] as a prereq, so it could fit right between [[HOT]] and [[DR]]. Again, awesome job -- I wish I had a clue about editing (even the link Naeya gave me mystified me) so I wouldn't have to bother you! --[[User:Thilan\|Thilan]] 16:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
			:If you're working on a new image to include FoU, then SoS should be changed to yellow since it's a Holy Defense spell and not Spirit Manipulation. Nice job keeping on top of it. --[[User:Thilan\|thilan]] 15:02, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

	== Sysop nomination ==		== Sysop nomination ==