User talk:Azhag - Revision history

CARAAMON: /* Shield Values */ new section

2009-02-19T17:00:25Z

Shield Values: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:00, 19 February 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Hey can you proofread and copy-edit [[Selling_Gem_Pouches]] for me, I'm not sure if that is clear enough. But I just wanted to write an article on it from all my times explaining the methods to newcomers in the gemshop in crossing! (I plan on writing a page on the numbers, and one "for traders" to refer to eventually) --[[User:Callek\|Callek]] 18:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)		Hey can you proofread and copy-edit [[Selling_Gem_Pouches]] for me, I'm not sure if that is clear enough. But I just wanted to write an article on it from all my times explaining the methods to newcomers in the gemshop in crossing! (I plan on writing a page on the numbers, and one "for traders" to refer to eventually) --[[User:Callek\|Callek]] 18:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

			== Shield Values ==

			Replied on my page. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 17:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

CALLEK: /* Trader Title Difficulties */

2009-02-12T05:52:12Z

Trader Title Difficulties

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:52, 12 February 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Replied to you on my page. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 02:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC)		Replied to you on my page. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 02:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
	:Hey, if any of these will help your quest... e-mail me and I'll send you list of my skills (I don't want them listed here)		:Hey, if any of these will help your quest... e-mail me and I'll send you list of my skills (I don't want them listed here) --[[User:Callek\|Callek]] 05:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
	::Initiate Trader, Apprentice Trader, Journeyman Trader, Trader, Hauler, Teamster, Traveler, Costermonger, Hawker, Cashier, Longshoreman, Peddler, Sutler, Emptor, Shipper, Lapidary, Corpse Hauler, Toastmaster, Bazaari, Factor, Courier, Gemologist, Auctioneer, Speculator, Broker, Horse Trader, Retailer, Debt Collector, Beneficiary, Bondsman, Auditor, Creditor, Usurer, Big Shot, Trustee, Comptroller, Errand Boy, Drover, Carter, Clerk, Apprentice Merchant, Amateur Haggler, Bargain Hunter, Bargain Seller, Tagger, Table Trader, Table Waiter, Junior Haggler, Salesman, Closer, Compromiser, Monger Friend, Market Trader, Haggler, Order Taker, Bidder, Commodity Trader, Floor Runner, Supplier, Bookkeeper, Floor Broker, Short Seller, Initiate Examiner, Initiate Evaluator, Apprentice Examiner, Apprentice Evaluator, Journeyman Examiner, Journeyman Evaluator, Shopping Enthusiast, Examiner, Evaluator, Expert Examiner, Expert Evaluator, Straw Boss, Bookie, Arbitrator, Arranger, Tradesman, Agent, Greedy		::Initiate Trader, Apprentice Trader, Journeyman Trader, Trader, Hauler, Teamster, Traveler, Costermonger, Hawker, Cashier, Longshoreman, Peddler, Sutler, Emptor, Shipper, Lapidary, Corpse Hauler, Toastmaster, Bazaari, Factor, Courier, Gemologist, Auctioneer, Speculator, Broker, Horse Trader, Retailer, Debt Collector, Beneficiary, Bondsman, Auditor, Creditor, Usurer, Big Shot, Trustee, Comptroller, Errand Boy, Drover, Carter, Clerk, Apprentice Merchant, Amateur Haggler, Bargain Hunter, Bargain Seller, Tagger, Table Trader, Table Waiter, Junior Haggler, Salesman, Closer, Compromiser, Monger Friend, Market Trader, Haggler, Order Taker, Bidder, Commodity Trader, Floor Runner, Supplier, Bookkeeper, Floor Broker, Short Seller, Initiate Examiner, Initiate Evaluator, Apprentice Examiner, Apprentice Evaluator, Journeyman Examiner, Journeyman Evaluator, Shopping Enthusiast, Examiner, Evaluator, Expert Examiner, Expert Evaluator, Straw Boss, Bookie, Arbitrator, Arranger, Tradesman, Agent, Greedy

CALLEK: /* Trader Title Difficulties */

2009-02-12T05:52:00Z

Trader Title Difficulties

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:52, 12 February 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Replied to you on my page. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 02:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC)		Replied to you on my page. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 02:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
			:Hey, if any of these will help your quest... e-mail me and I'll send you list of my skills (I don't want them listed here)
			::Initiate Trader, Apprentice Trader, Journeyman Trader, Trader, Hauler, Teamster, Traveler, Costermonger, Hawker, Cashier, Longshoreman, Peddler, Sutler, Emptor, Shipper, Lapidary, Corpse Hauler, Toastmaster, Bazaari, Factor, Courier, Gemologist, Auctioneer, Speculator, Broker, Horse Trader, Retailer, Debt Collector, Beneficiary, Bondsman, Auditor, Creditor, Usurer, Big Shot, Trustee, Comptroller, Errand Boy, Drover, Carter, Clerk, Apprentice Merchant, Amateur Haggler, Bargain Hunter, Bargain Seller, Tagger, Table Trader, Table Waiter, Junior Haggler, Salesman, Closer, Compromiser, Monger Friend, Market Trader, Haggler, Order Taker, Bidder, Commodity Trader, Floor Runner, Supplier, Bookkeeper, Floor Broker, Short Seller, Initiate Examiner, Initiate Evaluator, Apprentice Examiner, Apprentice Evaluator, Journeyman Examiner, Journeyman Evaluator, Shopping Enthusiast, Examiner, Evaluator, Expert Examiner, Expert Evaluator, Straw Boss, Bookie, Arbitrator, Arranger, Tradesman, Agent, Greedy

	== Gem Selling ==		== Gem Selling ==

CARAAMON at 02:54, 9 February 2009

2009-02-09T02:54:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 8 February 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::I understand better now, I was confused because a lot of guild titles had been using the "highest ranks" category so once I reread what the guidelines are it does make sense. [[User:Azhag\|Azhag]] 01:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)		:::I understand better now, I was confused because a lot of guild titles had been using the "highest ranks" category so once I reread what the guidelines are it does make sense. [[User:Azhag\|Azhag]] 01:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

			Replied to you on my page. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 02:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
	== Gem Selling ==		== Gem Selling ==

CALLEK: /* Gem Selling */ new section

2009-01-21T18:21:58Z

Gem Selling: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:21, 21 January 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::Can't. See, when it's a guild-based title, you can base it off the guild's advancement requirements and get an adequate hypothetical value. If it's just a general title, how? Do you use a barbarian's 6 ranks per circle in primary weapon? Or a moon mage's 0? See the problem? -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 00:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)		::Can't. See, when it's a guild-based title, you can base it off the guild's advancement requirements and get an adequate hypothetical value. If it's just a general title, how? Do you use a barbarian's 6 ranks per circle in primary weapon? Or a moon mage's 0? See the problem? -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 00:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
	:::I understand better now, I was confused because a lot of guild titles had been using the "highest ranks" category so once I reread what the guidelines are it does make sense. [[User:Azhag\|Azhag]] 01:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)		:::I understand better now, I was confused because a lot of guild titles had been using the "highest ranks" category so once I reread what the guidelines are it does make sense. [[User:Azhag\|Azhag]] 01:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

			== Gem Selling ==

			Hey can you proofread and copy-edit [[Selling_Gem_Pouches]] for me, I'm not sure if that is clear enough. But I just wanted to write an article on it from all my times explaining the methods to newcomers in the gemshop in crossing! (I plan on writing a page on the numbers, and one "for traders" to refer to eventually) --[[User:Callek\|Callek]] 18:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Maintenance script: /* Trader Title Difficulties */

2009-01-14T01:05:52Z

Trader Title Difficulties

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:05, 13 January 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:As the standard is now, sometimes the difficulty number represents a circle and other times it represents a rank. Those two numbers are on totally different scales so it leads to an inconsistent measurement. Sorting by difficulty ends up being useless. I think the correct way to do it would be to have difficulty always be a circle based number, so then it is consistent across guilds and makes sense when sorted. [[User:Azhag\|Azhag]] 19:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)		:As the standard is now, sometimes the difficulty number represents a circle and other times it represents a rank. Those two numbers are on totally different scales so it leads to an inconsistent measurement. Sorting by difficulty ends up being useless. I think the correct way to do it would be to have difficulty always be a circle based number, so then it is consistent across guilds and makes sense when sorted. [[User:Azhag\|Azhag]] 19:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
	::Can't. See, when it's a guild-based title, you can base it off the guild's advancement requirements and get an adequate hypothetical value. If it's just a general title, how? Do you use a barbarian's 6 ranks per circle in primary weapon? Or a moon mage's 0? See the problem? -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 00:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)		::Can't. See, when it's a guild-based title, you can base it off the guild's advancement requirements and get an adequate hypothetical value. If it's just a general title, how? Do you use a barbarian's 6 ranks per circle in primary weapon? Or a moon mage's 0? See the problem? -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 00:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
			:::I understand better now, I was confused because a lot of guild titles had been using the "highest ranks" category so once I reread what the guidelines are it does make sense. [[User:Azhag\|Azhag]] 01:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

CARAAMON at 00:55, 14 January 2009

2009-01-14T00:55:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:55, 13 January 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	On Callek's talk page you seem to have an issue with the standards for rating title difficulties. Mind going into detail? -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 08:57, 13 January 2009 (UTC)		On Callek's talk page you seem to have an issue with the standards for rating title difficulties. Mind going into detail? -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 08:57, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
	:As the standard is now, sometimes the difficulty number represents a circle and other times it represents a rank. Those two numbers are on totally different scales so it leads to an inconsistent measurement. Sorting by difficulty ends up being useless. I think the correct way to do it would be to have difficulty always be a circle based number, so then it is consistent across guilds and makes sense when sorted. [[User:Azhag\|Azhag]] 19:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)		:As the standard is now, sometimes the difficulty number represents a circle and other times it represents a rank. Those two numbers are on totally different scales so it leads to an inconsistent measurement. Sorting by difficulty ends up being useless. I think the correct way to do it would be to have difficulty always be a circle based number, so then it is consistent across guilds and makes sense when sorted. [[User:Azhag\|Azhag]] 19:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
			::Can't. See, when it's a guild-based title, you can base it off the guild's advancement requirements and get an adequate hypothetical value. If it's just a general title, how? Do you use a barbarian's 6 ranks per circle in primary weapon? Or a moon mage's 0? See the problem? -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 00:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Maintenance script at 19:47, 13 January 2009

2009-01-13T19:47:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:47, 13 January 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Trader Title Difficulties==		==Trader Title Difficulties==
	On Callek's talk page you seem to have an issue with the standards for rating title difficulties. Mind going into detail? -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 08:57, 13 January 2009 (UTC)		On Callek's talk page you seem to have an issue with the standards for rating title difficulties. Mind going into detail? -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 08:57, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
			:As the standard is now, sometimes the difficulty number represents a circle and other times it represents a rank. Those two numbers are on totally different scales so it leads to an inconsistent measurement. Sorting by difficulty ends up being useless. I think the correct way to do it would be to have difficulty always be a circle based number, so then it is consistent across guilds and makes sense when sorted. [[User:Azhag\|Azhag]] 19:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

CARAAMON: New page: ==Trader Title Difficulties== On Callek's talk page you seem to have an issue with the standards for rating title difficulties. Mind going into detail? -~~~~

2009-01-13T08:57:34Z

New page: ==Trader Title Difficulties== On Callek's talk page you seem to have an issue with the standards for rating title difficulties. Mind going into detail? -~~~~

New page

==Trader Title Difficulties==
On Callek's talk page you seem to have an issue with the standards for rating title difficulties. Mind going into detail? -Moderator [[User:Caraamon|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon|talk]])</sup> 08:57, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:05, 13 January 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:As the standard is now, sometimes the difficulty number represents a circle and other times it represents a rank. Those two numbers are on totally different scales so it leads to an inconsistent measurement. Sorting by difficulty ends up being useless. I think the correct way to do it would be to have difficulty always be a circle based number, so then it is consistent across guilds and makes sense when sorted. [[User:Azhag\|Azhag]] 19:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)		:As the standard is now, sometimes the difficulty number represents a circle and other times it represents a rank. Those two numbers are on totally different scales so it leads to an inconsistent measurement. Sorting by difficulty ends up being useless. I think the correct way to do it would be to have difficulty always be a circle based number, so then it is consistent across guilds and makes sense when sorted. [[User:Azhag\|Azhag]] 19:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
	::Can't. See, when it's a guild-based title, you can base it off the guild's advancement requirements and get an adequate hypothetical value. If it's just a general title, how? Do you use a barbarian's 6 ranks per circle in primary weapon? Or a moon mage's 0? See the problem? -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 00:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)		::Can't. See, when it's a guild-based title, you can base it off the guild's advancement requirements and get an adequate hypothetical value. If it's just a general title, how? Do you use a barbarian's 6 ranks per circle in primary weapon? Or a moon mage's 0? See the problem? -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 00:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
			:::I understand better now, I was confused because a lot of guild titles had been using the "highest ranks" category so once I reread what the guidelines are it does make sense. [[User:Azhag\|Azhag]] 01:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)