Template talk:Spell/old - Revision history

Maintenance script: New template in effect

2007-05-06T03:30:52Z

New template in effect

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:30, 5 May 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:

	:At long last I have completed the makeover. [[User:Farman/spelltemplate\|Check it out]], [[Regenerate\|take a look at a spell article using the new template]], and [[User talk:Farman/spelltemplate\|tell me what you think]]! --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 05:13, 2 May 2007 (CDT)		:At long last I have completed the makeover. [[User:Farman/spelltemplate\|Check it out]], [[Regenerate\|take a look at a spell article using the new template]], and [[User talk:Farman/spelltemplate\|tell me what you think]]! --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 05:13, 2 May 2007 (CDT)

			== New template in effect ==

			I've changed over to the new template version and archived this one. --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 22:30, 5 May 2007 (CDT)

Maintenance script: Template talk:Spell moved to Template talk:Spell/old: updating to new version of template

2007-05-06T03:17:29Z

Template talk:Spell moved to Template talk:Spell/old: updating to new version of template

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:17, 5 May 2007
(No difference)

Maintenance script: /* Template Update */

2007-05-02T10:15:30Z

Template Update

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:15, 2 May 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:Yes, sorry about the delay. I intend to start looking at it this weekend. --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 14:05, 27 April 2007 (CDT)		:Yes, sorry about the delay. I intend to start looking at it this weekend. --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 14:05, 27 April 2007 (CDT)

	:At long last I have completed the makeover. [[User:Farman/spelltemplate\|Check it out]] and [[User talk:Farman/spelltemplate\|tell me what you think]]! --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 05:13, 2 May 2007 (CDT)		:At long last I have completed the makeover. [[User:Farman/spelltemplate\|Check it out]], [[Regenerate\|take a look at a spell article using the new template]], and [[User talk:Farman/spelltemplate\|tell me what you think]]! --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 05:13, 2 May 2007 (CDT)

Maintenance script: /* Template Update */

2007-05-02T10:13:56Z

Template Update

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:13, 2 May 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:Yes, sorry about the delay. I intend to start looking at it this weekend. --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 14:05, 27 April 2007 (CDT)		:Yes, sorry about the delay. I intend to start looking at it this weekend. --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 14:05, 27 April 2007 (CDT)

			:At long last I have completed the makeover. [[User:Farman/spelltemplate\|Check it out]] and [[User talk:Farman/spelltemplate\|tell me what you think]]! --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 05:13, 2 May 2007 (CDT)

Maintenance script: /* Template Update */

2007-04-27T19:05:06Z

Template Update

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:05, 27 April 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Farman, did you still plan on updating this template or want someone else to take a crack at it?--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] ([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]]) 13:33, 27 April 2007 (CDT)		Farman, did you still plan on updating this template or want someone else to take a crack at it?--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] ([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]]) 13:33, 27 April 2007 (CDT)

			:Yes, sorry about the delay. I intend to start looking at it this weekend. --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 14:05, 27 April 2007 (CDT)

Maintenance script: Template Update

2007-04-27T18:33:50Z

Template Update

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:33, 27 April 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Never mind this one... for some reason it was happening last night but it no longer is. :P --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 12:28, 26 April 2007 (CDT)		Never mind this one... for some reason it was happening last night but it no longer is. :P --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 12:28, 26 April 2007 (CDT)

			== Template Update ==

			Farman, did you still plan on updating this template or want someone else to take a crack at it?--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] ([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]]) 13:33, 27 April 2007 (CDT)

Maintenance script: /* Other problems */

2007-04-26T17:28:29Z

Maintenance script: /* Remove 'notes' field, split template */

2007-04-26T17:20:25Z

Remove 'notes' field, split template

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:20, 26 April 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Remove 'notes' field, split template==		==Remove 'notes' field, split template==
	As I mentioned on the project page, I think the 'notes' field should be removed, as I believe this is an unusual and non-intuitive way to edit a wiki article. Keeping the <nowiki>"==Notes=="</nowiki> part of the template (and perhaps adding other subsection headers) however is a good idea to maintain a consistent look to all spell articles. Then I suppose this template would be split into two parts: an infobox, and an article template that would be copy/pasted into new articles. --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 22:16, 27 March 2007 (CDT)		As I mentioned on the project page, I think the 'notes' field should be removed, as I believe this is an unusual and non-intuitive way to edit a wiki article. Keeping the <nowiki>"==Notes=="</nowiki> part of the template (and perhaps adding other subsection headers) however is a good idea to maintain a consistent look to all spell articles. Then I suppose this template would be split into two parts: an infobox, and an article template that would be copy/pasted into new articles. --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 22:16, 27 March 2007 (CDT)

			==Other problems==
			I've also noticed that for some reason if you append anything after the template call in an individual spell article, the text ends up as if it were within <nowiki><pre></nowiki> tags. I haven't yet figured out why this is, but it's a problem for future editors. --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 12:20, 26 April 2007 (CDT)

Maintenance script: /* Remove 'notes' field */

2007-03-28T03:18:37Z

Remove 'notes' field

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:18, 27 March 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Remove 'notes' field==		==Remove 'notes' field, split template==
	As I mentioned on the project page, I think the 'notes' field should be removed, as I believe this is an unusual and non-intuitive way to edit a wiki article. Keeping the <nowiki>"==Notes=="</nowiki> part of the template (and perhaps adding other subsection headers) however is a good idea to maintain a consistent look to all spell articles. Then I suppose this template would be split into two parts: an infobox, and an article template that would be copy/pasted into new articles. --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 22:16, 27 March 2007 (CDT)		As I mentioned on the project page, I think the 'notes' field should be removed, as I believe this is an unusual and non-intuitive way to edit a wiki article. Keeping the <nowiki>"==Notes=="</nowiki> part of the template (and perhaps adding other subsection headers) however is a good idea to maintain a consistent look to all spell articles. Then I suppose this template would be split into two parts: an infobox, and an article template that would be copy/pasted into new articles. --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 22:16, 27 March 2007 (CDT)

Maintenance script: /* Remove 'notes' field */

2007-03-28T03:18:15Z

Remove 'notes' field

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:18, 27 March 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Remove 'notes' field==		==Remove 'notes' field==
	As I mentioned on the project page, I think the 'notes' field should be removed, as I believe this is an unusual and non-intuitive way to edit a wiki article. Keeping the <nowiki>"==Notes=="</nowiki> part of the template (and perhaps adding other subsection headers) however is a good idea to maintain a consistent look to all spell articles. --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 22:16, 27 March 2007 (CDT)		As I mentioned on the project page, I think the 'notes' field should be removed, as I believe this is an unusual and non-intuitive way to edit a wiki article. Keeping the <nowiki>"==Notes=="</nowiki> part of the template (and perhaps adding other subsection headers) however is a good idea to maintain a consistent look to all spell articles. Then I suppose this template would be split into two parts: an infobox, and an article template that would be copy/pasted into new articles. --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 22:16, 27 March 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:28, 26 April 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	==Other problems==		==Other problems==
	I've also noticed that for some reason if you append anything after the template call in an individual spell article, the text ends up as if it were within <nowiki><pre></nowiki> tags. I haven't yet figured out why this is, but it's a problem for future editors. --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 12:20, 26 April 2007 (CDT)		I've also noticed that for some reason if you append anything after the template call in an individual spell article, the text ends up as if it were within <nowiki><pre></nowiki> tags. I haven't yet figured out why this is, but it's a problem for future editors. --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 12:20, 26 April 2007 (CDT)

			Never mind this one... for some reason it was happening last night but it no longer is. :P --[[User:Farman\|Farman]] 12:28, 26 April 2007 (CDT)