Template talk:Shield - Revision history

ZUERCAT: /* Held vs. Worn */

2022-11-17T03:45:02Z

Held vs. Worn

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:45, 16 November 2022
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::: I think... you've got this backwards? We can see the ''held'' stats when appraising from a surface, but not the ''arm-worn'' values. Right? I have made the '''arm-worn''' values for damage (puncture/slice/impact), balance, and suitedness optional.<br>Examples: {{ilink\|s\|triangular black tursa sipar inlaid with the emblem of Saint Detlef}} and {{ilink\|s\|steel heater shield displaying a black charging ram across the front}}.<br>That work? -- [[User:TK-421\|TK-421]] ([[User talk:TK-421\|talk]]) 13:37, 16 November 2022 (CST)		::: I think... you've got this backwards? We can see the ''held'' stats when appraising from a surface, but not the ''arm-worn'' values. Right? I have made the '''arm-worn''' values for damage (puncture/slice/impact), balance, and suitedness optional.<br>Examples: {{ilink\|s\|triangular black tursa sipar inlaid with the emblem of Saint Detlef}} and {{ilink\|s\|steel heater shield displaying a black charging ram across the front}}.<br>That work? -- [[User:TK-421\|TK-421]] ([[User talk:TK-421\|talk]]) 13:37, 16 November 2022 (CST)
	::: That looks like it solved the concern you had with [[Tower of Terror]]. There's [[Shield:Steel heater shield displaying a black charging ram across the front\|one item left]] that's missing a hinderance value, but the rest are showing up without errors now. -- [[User:TK-421\|TK-421]] ([[User talk:TK-421\|talk]]) 16:44, 16 November 2022 (CST)		::: That looks like it solved the concern you had with [[Tower of Terror]]. There's [[Shield:Steel heater shield displaying a black charging ram across the front\|one item left]] that's missing a hinderance value, but the rest are showing up without errors now. -- [[User:TK-421\|TK-421]] ([[User talk:TK-421\|talk]]) 16:44, 16 November 2022 (CST)
			:::: Perfect, thanks for interpreting what I meant not what I said. I appreciate the quick fix. If I'd started mucking about it would have taken ages and we might have gotten information from foods or flowers showing up somehow...heh. [[Kythryn]] 21:45, 16 November 2022 (CST)

TK-421: /* Held vs. Worn */

2022-11-16T22:44:13Z

Held vs. Worn

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:44, 16 November 2022
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:: Could we also update this so that if the the held damage values are missing, it won't add the ''Incomplete Item'' tag at the top of the page? We can't pull that info from items we just appraise off shop surfaces, so we're going to have a LOT of incomplete shields over the years if we make those required fields. Thanks! [[Kythryn]] 02:57, 16 November 2022 (CST)		:: Could we also update this so that if the the held damage values are missing, it won't add the ''Incomplete Item'' tag at the top of the page? We can't pull that info from items we just appraise off shop surfaces, so we're going to have a LOT of incomplete shields over the years if we make those required fields. Thanks! [[Kythryn]] 02:57, 16 November 2022 (CST)
	::: I think... you've got this backwards? We can see the ''held'' stats when appraising from a surface, but not the ''arm-worn'' values. Right? I have made the '''arm-worn''' values for damage (puncture/slice/impact), balance, and suitedness optional.<br>Examples: {{ilink\|s\|triangular black tursa sipar inlaid with the emblem of Saint Detlef}} and {{ilink\|s\|steel heater shield displaying a black charging ram across the front}}.<br>That work? -- [[User:TK-421\|TK-421]] ([[User talk:TK-421\|talk]]) 13:37, 16 November 2022 (CST)		::: I think... you've got this backwards? We can see the ''held'' stats when appraising from a surface, but not the ''arm-worn'' values. Right? I have made the '''arm-worn''' values for damage (puncture/slice/impact), balance, and suitedness optional.<br>Examples: {{ilink\|s\|triangular black tursa sipar inlaid with the emblem of Saint Detlef}} and {{ilink\|s\|steel heater shield displaying a black charging ram across the front}}.<br>That work? -- [[User:TK-421\|TK-421]] ([[User talk:TK-421\|talk]]) 13:37, 16 November 2022 (CST)
			::: That looks like it solved the concern you had with [[Tower of Terror]]. There's [[Shield:Steel heater shield displaying a black charging ram across the front\|one item left]] that's missing a hinderance value, but the rest are showing up without errors now. -- [[User:TK-421\|TK-421]] ([[User talk:TK-421\|talk]]) 16:44, 16 November 2022 (CST)

TK-421: /* Held vs. Worn */

2022-11-16T19:37:43Z

Held vs. Worn

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:37, 16 November 2022
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:FIVE YEARS LATER! --[[User:TEVESHSZAT\|TEVESHSZAT]] ([[User talk:TEVESHSZAT\|talk]]) 15:00, 3 April 2021 (CDT)		:FIVE YEARS LATER! --[[User:TEVESHSZAT\|TEVESHSZAT]] ([[User talk:TEVESHSZAT\|talk]]) 15:00, 3 April 2021 (CDT)
	:: Could we also update this so that if the the held damage values are missing, it won't add the ''Incomplete Item'' tag at the top of the page? We can't pull that info from items we just appraise off shop surfaces, so we're going to have a LOT of incomplete shields over the years if we make those required fields. Thanks! [[Kythryn]] 02:57, 16 November 2022 (CST)		:: Could we also update this so that if the the held damage values are missing, it won't add the ''Incomplete Item'' tag at the top of the page? We can't pull that info from items we just appraise off shop surfaces, so we're going to have a LOT of incomplete shields over the years if we make those required fields. Thanks! [[Kythryn]] 02:57, 16 November 2022 (CST)
			::: I think... you've got this backwards? We can see the ''held'' stats when appraising from a surface, but not the ''arm-worn'' values. Right? I have made the '''arm-worn''' values for damage (puncture/slice/impact), balance, and suitedness optional.<br>Examples: {{ilink\|s\|triangular black tursa sipar inlaid with the emblem of Saint Detlef}} and {{ilink\|s\|steel heater shield displaying a black charging ram across the front}}.<br>That work? -- [[User:TK-421\|TK-421]] ([[User talk:TK-421\|talk]]) 13:37, 16 November 2022 (CST)

ZUERCAT: /* Held vs. Worn */

2022-11-16T08:57:52Z

Held vs. Worn

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:57, 16 November 2022
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Can we update this template so that both the held and worn protection and damage values can be captured please? --[[User:RCHIGHT\|RCHIGHT]] ([[User talk:RCHIGHT\|talk]]) 17:26, 28 April 2016 (CDT)		Can we update this template so that both the held and worn protection and damage values can be captured please? --[[User:RCHIGHT\|RCHIGHT]] ([[User talk:RCHIGHT\|talk]]) 17:26, 28 April 2016 (CDT)
	:FIVE YEARS LATER! --[[User:TEVESHSZAT\|TEVESHSZAT]] ([[User talk:TEVESHSZAT\|talk]]) 15:00, 3 April 2021 (CDT)		:FIVE YEARS LATER! --[[User:TEVESHSZAT\|TEVESHSZAT]] ([[User talk:TEVESHSZAT\|talk]]) 15:00, 3 April 2021 (CDT)
			:: Could we also update this so that if the the held damage values are missing, it won't add the ''Incomplete Item'' tag at the top of the page? We can't pull that info from items we just appraise off shop surfaces, so we're going to have a LOT of incomplete shields over the years if we make those required fields. Thanks! [[Kythryn]] 02:57, 16 November 2022 (CST)

TEVESHSZAT: /* Held vs. Worn */

2021-04-03T20:00:31Z

Held vs. Worn

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:00, 3 April 2021
Line 8:		Line 8:
	==Held vs. Worn==		==Held vs. Worn==
	Can we update this template so that both the held and worn protection and damage values can be captured please? --[[User:RCHIGHT\|RCHIGHT]] ([[User talk:RCHIGHT\|talk]]) 17:26, 28 April 2016 (CDT)		Can we update this template so that both the held and worn protection and damage values can be captured please? --[[User:RCHIGHT\|RCHIGHT]] ([[User talk:RCHIGHT\|talk]]) 17:26, 28 April 2016 (CDT)
			:FIVE YEARS LATER! --[[User:TEVESHSZAT\|TEVESHSZAT]] ([[User talk:TEVESHSZAT\|talk]]) 15:00, 3 April 2021 (CDT)

RCHIGHT: /* Held vs. Worn */

2016-04-28T22:26:41Z

Held vs. Worn

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 28 April 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:

	==Held vs. Worn==		==Held vs. Worn==
	Can we update this template so that both the held and worn protection and damage values can be captured please? -~~Rhadyn~~		Can we update this template so that both the held and worn protection and damage values can be captured please? --[[User:RCHIGHT\|RCHIGHT]] ([[User talk:RCHIGHT\|talk]]) 17:26, 28 April 2016 (CDT)

RCHIGHT at 17:13, 17 April 2016

2016-04-17T17:13:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:13, 17 April 2016
Line 5:		Line 5:
	==Paladins==		==Paladins==
	I've updated it so now Paladins can put in their more detailed appraisal info. It won't metter for searching, but it's a first step. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 06:10, 12 October 2010 (UTC)		I've updated it so now Paladins can put in their more detailed appraisal info. It won't metter for searching, but it's a first step. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 06:10, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

			==Held vs. Worn==
			Can we update this template so that both the held and worn protection and damage values can be captured please? -Rhadyn

CARAAMON: /* Durability 2.0 */

2010-10-12T06:10:39Z

Durability 2.0

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:10, 12 October 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I've updated the [[Appraisal]] article with the new ranges for damage, balance/power, construction, and condition. The template needs to be updated. You might want to flag pre-Durability 2.0 shields with a notice that the ranges have changed. --[[User:Isharon\|Isharon]] 18:05, 10 October 2010 (UTC)		I've updated the [[Appraisal]] article with the new ranges for damage, balance/power, construction, and condition. The template needs to be updated. You might want to flag pre-Durability 2.0 shields with a notice that the ranges have changed. --[[User:Isharon\|Isharon]] 18:05, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

			==Paladins==
			I've updated it so now Paladins can put in their more detailed appraisal info. It won't metter for searching, but it's a first step. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 06:10, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

ISHARON: Created page with '==Durability 2.0 == I've updated the Appraisal article with the new ranges for damage, balance/power, construction, and condition. The template needs to be updated. You migh…'

2010-10-10T18:05:47Z

Created page with '==Durability 2.0 == I've updated the Appraisal article with the new ranges for damage, balance/power, construction, and condition. The template needs to be updated. You migh…'

New page

==Durability 2.0 ==

I've updated the [[Appraisal]] article with the new ranges for damage, balance/power, construction, and condition. The template needs to be updated. You might want to flag pre-Durability 2.0 shields with a notice that the ranges have changed. --[[User:Isharon|Isharon]] 18:05, 10 October 2010 (UTC)