Template talk:ItemProperties - Revision history

NYCDKID at 20:19, 22 March 2024

2024-03-22T20:19:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:19, 22 March 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Would it be possible to show the imax property value for items with type=mail? The packages & envelopes can only hold 9 items maximum. The template currently only shows the dimensions and csize. --[[User:NYCDKID\|NYCDKID]] ([[User talk:NYCDKID\|talk]]) 15:19, 22 March 2024 (CDT)

	Can we add a new template option for items that is separate from "hood"? I think "hood" should be reserved for items that hide features, and a new option should be added for concealing items. Lets call it "conceal"? This would prevent questions from people like me when they see the phrase "hides features OR items", not knowing which it does or both. --[[User:Juugcatm\|Juugcatm]] 22:54, 6 April 2011 (UTC)		Can we add a new template option for items that is separate from "hood"? I think "hood" should be reserved for items that hide features, and a new option should be added for concealing items. Lets call it "conceal"? This would prevent questions from people like me when they see the phrase "hides features OR items", not knowing which it does or both. --[[User:Juugcatm\|Juugcatm]] 22:54, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

RY4NPW: /* "stacking" items are also "tack" */ revised question

2016-05-12T03:20:23Z

"stacking" items are also "tack": revised question

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:20, 11 May 2016
Line 11:		Line 11:
	}}</nowiki></pre>		}}</nowiki></pre>

	This works ~~by itself on my sandbox page~~, however ~~the item page linked above still seems to be broken. Any thoughts? Another alternative would be to just rename "tack" to "horse" or "mount" and avoid the issue. Does~~ my change break the way the "Edit with Form" enumerates the different Item Types? - [[User:RY4NPW\|padhg]] ([[User talk:RY4NPW\|talk]]) 22:08, 11 May 2016 (CDT)		This works, however, will my change break the way the "Edit with Form" enumerates the different Item Types? - [[User:RY4NPW\|padhg]] ([[User talk:RY4NPW\|talk]]) 22:08, 11 May 2016 (CDT)

RY4NPW: /* "stacking" items are also "tack" */ added link to change/diff

2016-05-12T03:14:56Z

"stacking" items are also "tack": added link to change/diff

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, 11 May 2016
Line 3:		Line 3:
	== "stacking" items are also "tack" ==		== "stacking" items are also "tack" ==

	I added the "stacking" type to [[Item:Iron lockpick ring]] and it was getting both the tack and the stacking messaging. Looking at the code, this is because "stacking" matches "tack" as well. Now, I tried to fix this by doing a some logic where we first check for tack, and then for stacking like follows:		I added the "stacking" type to [[Item:Iron lockpick ring]] and it was getting both the tack and the stacking messaging. Looking at the code, this is because "stacking" matches "tack" as well. Now, I tried to fix ([https://elanthipedia.play.net/mediawiki/index.php?title=Template:ItemProperties&curid=9613&diff=442671&oldid=438535 diff]) this by doing a some logic where we first check for tack, and then for stacking like follows:

	<pre><nowiki>		<pre><nowiki>

RY4NPW: /* "stacking" items are also "tack" */ new section

2016-05-12T03:08:42Z

"stacking" items are also "tack": new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:08, 11 May 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Can we add a new template option for items that is separate from "hood"? I think "hood" should be reserved for items that hide features, and a new option should be added for concealing items. Lets call it "conceal"? This would prevent questions from people like me when they see the phrase "hides features OR items", not knowing which it does or both. --[[User:Juugcatm\|Juugcatm]] 22:54, 6 April 2011 (UTC)		Can we add a new template option for items that is separate from "hood"? I think "hood" should be reserved for items that hide features, and a new option should be added for concealing items. Lets call it "conceal"? This would prevent questions from people like me when they see the phrase "hides features OR items", not knowing which it does or both. --[[User:Juugcatm\|Juugcatm]] 22:54, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

			== "stacking" items are also "tack" ==

			I added the "stacking" type to [[Item:Iron lockpick ring]] and it was getting both the tack and the stacking messaging. Looking at the code, this is because "stacking" matches "tack" as well. Now, I tried to fix this by doing a some logic where we first check for tack, and then for stacking like follows:

			<pre><nowiki>
			{{IfMatch \| tack \| {{{special}}} \| true={{
			IfMatch \| stacking \| {{{special}}} \| true=*This item reduces the inventory count and/or weight of its contents.
			\| false=*This item is designed to be worn by or used on a horse or mount.}}
			}}</nowiki></pre>

			This works by itself on my sandbox page, however the item page linked above still seems to be broken. Any thoughts? Another alternative would be to just rename "tack" to "horse" or "mount" and avoid the issue. Does my change break the way the "Edit with Form" enumerates the different Item Types? - [[User:RY4NPW\|padhg]] ([[User talk:RY4NPW\|talk]]) 22:08, 11 May 2016 (CDT)

JUUGCATM: Created page with 'Can we add a new template option for items that is separate from "hood"? I think "hood" should be reserved for items that hide features, and a new option should be added for conc…'

2011-04-06T22:54:24Z

Created page with 'Can we add a new template option for items that is separate from "hood"? I think "hood" should be reserved for items that hide features, and a new option should be added for conc…'

New page

Can we add a new template option for items that is separate from "hood"? I think "hood" should be reserved for items that hide features, and a new option should be added for concealing items. Lets call it "conceal"? This would prevent questions from people like me when they see the phrase "hides features OR items", not knowing which it does or both. --[[User:Juugcatm|Juugcatm]] 22:54, 6 April 2011 (UTC)