Talk:Wood - Revision history

HRODBERACHT: /* Weigh in on Wood */

2010-11-15T18:51:09Z

Weigh in on Wood

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:51, 15 November 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::::::Currently possible to find as in "can be foraged," or currently found in Elanthia, period? The list I had compiled before was the latter of the two. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 05:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)		::::::Currently possible to find as in "can be foraged," or currently found in Elanthia, period? The list I had compiled before was the latter of the two. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 05:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
	:::::::<font color=006600>As in can be acquired in some manner in a raw form. In addition, feel free to add anything that has unique properties associated with it, behaves or is treated differently in Elanthia, or is significant for other reasons. Basically, only add things that have properties not covered by a Wikipedia page on them.-Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 10:35, 15 November 2010 (UTC)</font>		:::::::<font color=006600>As in can be acquired in some manner in a raw form. In addition, feel free to add anything that has unique properties associated with it, behaves or is treated differently in Elanthia, or is significant for other reasons. Basically, only add things that have properties not covered by a Wikipedia page on them.-Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 10:35, 15 November 2010 (UTC)</font>
			::::::::Sorry, Caraamon, but that's not the opinion contributors are expressing here. By and large, the comments above indicate a preference for including both, as Naeya wrote, "exclusive or not." I agree we don't need descriptions or properties for any Real World wood that has no uniquely Elanthian qualities, as most of the comments also say. However, I am going to include them all. I think the best solution for now is to go with two lists, as Naeya suggested. If the release of wood carving, etc, adds more information on all of the "other" woods then I see going somewhere in the direction that metals is, with a separate attribute-table page. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 18:51, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

CARAAMON at 10:35, 15 November 2010

2010-11-15T10:35:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:35, 15 November 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:::::<font color=006600>Very well, it seems most people would like to have other woods included. As a test case, go ahead and include those which are currently possible to find. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 04:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)</font>		:::::<font color=006600>Very well, it seems most people would like to have other woods included. As a test case, go ahead and include those which are currently possible to find. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 04:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)</font>
	::::::Currently possible to find as in "can be foraged," or currently found in Elanthia, period? The list I had compiled before was the latter of the two. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 05:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)		::::::Currently possible to find as in "can be foraged," or currently found in Elanthia, period? The list I had compiled before was the latter of the two. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 05:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
			:::::::<font color=006600>As in can be acquired in some manner in a raw form. In addition, feel free to add anything that has unique properties associated with it, behaves or is treated differently in Elanthia, or is significant for other reasons. Basically, only add things that have properties not covered by a Wikipedia page on them.-Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 10:35, 15 November 2010 (UTC)</font>

HRODBERACHT: /* Weigh in on Wood */

2010-11-15T05:41:58Z

Weigh in on Wood

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:41, 15 November 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::::I agree with the others. I'd like to see both Elanthia-only <b>and</b> real world woods listed, just with descriptions kept short and primarily for woods only found within the game. <s>However, I think either a new type of table or guideline might be in order for materials if so. If they released appraisals for wood similar to metals, to coincide with carving, the page would quickly become just as much an eyesore as the metals page.</s> (Oh! Nevermind. I see you just changed that page tonight. Great work!) --[[User:Anna Raven\|Anna Raven]] 09:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		::::I agree with the others. I'd like to see both Elanthia-only <b>and</b> real world woods listed, just with descriptions kept short and primarily for woods only found within the game. <s>However, I think either a new type of table or guideline might be in order for materials if so. If they released appraisals for wood similar to metals, to coincide with carving, the page would quickly become just as much an eyesore as the metals page.</s> (Oh! Nevermind. I see you just changed that page tonight. Great work!) --[[User:Anna Raven\|Anna Raven]] 09:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
	:::::<font color=006600>Very well, it seems most people would like to have other woods included. As a test case, go ahead and include those which are currently possible to find. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 04:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)</font>		:::::<font color=006600>Very well, it seems most people would like to have other woods included. As a test case, go ahead and include those which are currently possible to find. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 04:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)</font>
	::::::Currently possible to find as in "can be foraged," or currently found in Elanthia, period? The list before was the latter. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 05:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)		::::::Currently possible to find as in "can be foraged," or currently found in Elanthia, period? The list I had compiled before was the latter of the two. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 05:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

HRODBERACHT: /* Weigh in on Wood */

2010-11-15T05:34:51Z

Weigh in on Wood

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:34, 15 November 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::::I agree with the others. I'd like to see both Elanthia-only <b>and</b> real world woods listed, just with descriptions kept short and primarily for woods only found within the game. <s>However, I think either a new type of table or guideline might be in order for materials if so. If they released appraisals for wood similar to metals, to coincide with carving, the page would quickly become just as much an eyesore as the metals page.</s> (Oh! Nevermind. I see you just changed that page tonight. Great work!) --[[User:Anna Raven\|Anna Raven]] 09:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		::::I agree with the others. I'd like to see both Elanthia-only <b>and</b> real world woods listed, just with descriptions kept short and primarily for woods only found within the game. <s>However, I think either a new type of table or guideline might be in order for materials if so. If they released appraisals for wood similar to metals, to coincide with carving, the page would quickly become just as much an eyesore as the metals page.</s> (Oh! Nevermind. I see you just changed that page tonight. Great work!) --[[User:Anna Raven\|Anna Raven]] 09:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
	:::::<font color=006600>Very well, it seems most people would like to have other woods included. As a test case, go ahead and include those which are currently possible to find. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 04:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)</font>		:::::<font color=006600>Very well, it seems most people would like to have other woods included. As a test case, go ahead and include those which are currently possible to find. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 04:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)</font>
			::::::Currently possible to find as in "can be foraged," or currently found in Elanthia, period? The list before was the latter. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 05:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

CARAAMON at 04:24, 15 November 2010

2010-11-15T04:24:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:24, 14 November 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:::My vote is to do what Naeya said, and we can leave the longer descriptions etc for the Elanthia only woods, and have less (or no) description for RL woods. --[[User:Hithrael\|Hithrael]] 05:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		:::My vote is to do what Naeya said, and we can leave the longer descriptions etc for the Elanthia only woods, and have less (or no) description for RL woods. --[[User:Hithrael\|Hithrael]] 05:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
	::::I agree with the others. I'd like to see both Elanthia-only <b>and</b> real world woods listed, just with descriptions kept short and primarily for woods only found within the game. <s>However, I think either a new type of table or guideline might be in order for materials if so. If they released appraisals for wood similar to metals, to coincide with carving, the page would quickly become just as much an eyesore as the metals page.</s> (Oh! Nevermind. I see you just changed that page tonight. Great work!) --[[User:Anna Raven\|Anna Raven]] 09:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		::::I agree with the others. I'd like to see both Elanthia-only <b>and</b> real world woods listed, just with descriptions kept short and primarily for woods only found within the game. <s>However, I think either a new type of table or guideline might be in order for materials if so. If they released appraisals for wood similar to metals, to coincide with carving, the page would quickly become just as much an eyesore as the metals page.</s> (Oh! Nevermind. I see you just changed that page tonight. Great work!) --[[User:Anna Raven\|Anna Raven]] 09:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
		⚫	:::::<font color=006600>Very well, it seems most people would like to have other woods included. As a test case, go ahead and include those which are currently possible to find. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 04:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)</font>

⚫	Very well, it seems most people would like to have other woods included. As a test case, go ahead and include those which are currently possible to find. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 04:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

CARAAMON at 04:22, 15 November 2010

2010-11-15T04:22:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:22, 14 November 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:::My vote is to do what Naeya said, and we can leave the longer descriptions etc for the Elanthia only woods, and have less (or no) description for RL woods. --[[User:Hithrael\|Hithrael]] 05:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		:::My vote is to do what Naeya said, and we can leave the longer descriptions etc for the Elanthia only woods, and have less (or no) description for RL woods. --[[User:Hithrael\|Hithrael]] 05:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
	::::I agree with the others. I'd like to see both Elanthia-only <b>and</b> real world woods listed, just with descriptions kept short and primarily for woods only found within the game. <s>However, I think either a new type of table or guideline might be in order for materials if so. If they released appraisals for wood similar to metals, to coincide with carving, the page would quickly become just as much an eyesore as the metals page.</s> (Oh! Nevermind. I see you just changed that page tonight. Great work!) --[[User:Anna Raven\|Anna Raven]] 09:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		::::I agree with the others. I'd like to see both Elanthia-only <b>and</b> real world woods listed, just with descriptions kept short and primarily for woods only found within the game. <s>However, I think either a new type of table or guideline might be in order for materials if so. If they released appraisals for wood similar to metals, to coincide with carving, the page would quickly become just as much an eyesore as the metals page.</s> (Oh! Nevermind. I see you just changed that page tonight. Great work!) --[[User:Anna Raven\|Anna Raven]] 09:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

			Very well, it seems most people would like to have other woods included. As a test case, go ahead and include those which are currently possible to find. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 04:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Maintenance script: /* Weigh in on Wood */

2010-11-14T09:40:30Z

Weigh in on Wood

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:40, 14 November 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	::We could distinguish between Elanthia exclusive items, just have two different lists, but on the same page. I think that would make it both inclusive and complete, yet have the distinction at a glance. But I am for including all wood types in Elanthia, exclusive or not.--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 05:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		::We could distinguish between Elanthia exclusive items, just have two different lists, but on the same page. I think that would make it both inclusive and complete, yet have the distinction at a glance. But I am for including all wood types in Elanthia, exclusive or not.--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 05:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
	:::My vote is to do what Naeya said, and we can leave the longer descriptions etc for the Elanthia only woods, and have less (or no) description for RL woods. --[[User:Hithrael\|Hithrael]] 05:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		:::My vote is to do what Naeya said, and we can leave the longer descriptions etc for the Elanthia only woods, and have less (or no) description for RL woods. --[[User:Hithrael\|Hithrael]] 05:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
	::::I agree with the others. I'd like to see both Elanthia-only <b>and</b> real world woods listed, just with descriptions kept short and primarily for woods only found within the game. However, I think either a new type of table or guideline might be in order for materials if so. If they released appraisals for wood similar to metals, to coincide with carving, the page would quickly become just as much an eyesore as the metals page. --[[User:Anna Raven\|Anna Raven]] 09:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		::::I agree with the others. I'd like to see both Elanthia-only <b>and</b> real world woods listed, just with descriptions kept short and primarily for woods only found within the game. <s>However, I think either a new type of table or guideline might be in order for materials if so. If they released appraisals for wood similar to metals, to coincide with carving, the page would quickly become just as much an eyesore as the metals page.</s> (Oh! Nevermind. I see you just changed that page tonight. Great work!) --[[User:Anna Raven\|Anna Raven]] 09:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Maintenance script at 09:37, 14 November 2010

2010-11-14T09:37:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:37, 14 November 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	::We could distinguish between Elanthia exclusive items, just have two different lists, but on the same page. I think that would make it both inclusive and complete, yet have the distinction at a glance. But I am for including all wood types in Elanthia, exclusive or not.--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 05:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		::We could distinguish between Elanthia exclusive items, just have two different lists, but on the same page. I think that would make it both inclusive and complete, yet have the distinction at a glance. But I am for including all wood types in Elanthia, exclusive or not.--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 05:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
	:::My vote is to do what Naeya said, and we can leave the longer descriptions etc for the Elanthia only woods, and have less (or no) description for RL woods. --[[User:Hithrael\|Hithrael]] 05:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		:::My vote is to do what Naeya said, and we can leave the longer descriptions etc for the Elanthia only woods, and have less (or no) description for RL woods. --[[User:Hithrael\|Hithrael]] 05:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
			::::I agree with the others. I'd like to see both Elanthia-only <b>and</b> real world woods listed, just with descriptions kept short and primarily for woods only found within the game. However, I think either a new type of table or guideline might be in order for materials if so. If they released appraisals for wood similar to metals, to coincide with carving, the page would quickly become just as much an eyesore as the metals page. --[[User:Anna Raven\|Anna Raven]] 09:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Maintenance script at 05:36, 14 November 2010

2010-11-14T05:36:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:36, 14 November 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	: As I read this, it strikes me that "pedia" is from the Greek paideia, meaning education, or culture. That being said, I would take that to mean that "Elanthipedia" would be literally, education on Elanthia. To have anything less than a fully comprehensive list, containing all the woods (or whatever we're talking about) found in the world of Elanthia seems to just negate the entire point of the site. After all, it seems that I read something about this in the front page "mission statement". [[User:StefynX\|StefynX]] 04:56, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		: As I read this, it strikes me that "pedia" is from the Greek paideia, meaning education, or culture. That being said, I would take that to mean that "Elanthipedia" would be literally, education on Elanthia. To have anything less than a fully comprehensive list, containing all the woods (or whatever we're talking about) found in the world of Elanthia seems to just negate the entire point of the site. After all, it seems that I read something about this in the front page "mission statement". [[User:StefynX\|StefynX]] 04:56, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
	::We could distinguish between Elanthia exclusive items, just have two different lists, but on the same page. I think that would make it both inclusive and complete, yet have the distinction at a glance. But I am for including all wood types in Elanthia, exclusive or not.--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 05:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		::We could distinguish between Elanthia exclusive items, just have two different lists, but on the same page. I think that would make it both inclusive and complete, yet have the distinction at a glance. But I am for including all wood types in Elanthia, exclusive or not.--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 05:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
			:::My vote is to do what Naeya said, and we can leave the longer descriptions etc for the Elanthia only woods, and have less (or no) description for RL woods. --[[User:Hithrael\|Hithrael]] 05:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Maintenance script: /* Weigh in on Wood */

2010-11-14T05:13:56Z

Weigh in on Wood

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:13, 14 November 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	: Agree with this, that it should be too hard to have a small table of woods, leave the longer descriptioned ones out of the table. MOST of the common woods without "descriptions" are not required for alterations too, so should make things easier. --[[User:Ysselt\|Ysselt]] 04:27, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		: Agree with this, that it should be too hard to have a small table of woods, leave the longer descriptioned ones out of the table. MOST of the common woods without "descriptions" are not required for alterations too, so should make things easier. --[[User:Ysselt\|Ysselt]] 04:27, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
	: As I read this, it strikes me that "pedia" is from the Greek paideia, meaning education, or culture. That being said, I would take that to mean that "Elanthipedia" would be literally, education on Elanthia. To have anything less than a fully comprehensive list, containing all the woods (or whatever we're talking about) found in the world of Elanthia seems to just negate the entire point of the site. After all, it seems that I read something about this in the front page "mission statement". [[User:StefynX\|StefynX]] 04:56, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		: As I read this, it strikes me that "pedia" is from the Greek paideia, meaning education, or culture. That being said, I would take that to mean that "Elanthipedia" would be literally, education on Elanthia. To have anything less than a fully comprehensive list, containing all the woods (or whatever we're talking about) found in the world of Elanthia seems to just negate the entire point of the site. After all, it seems that I read something about this in the front page "mission statement". [[User:StefynX\|StefynX]] 04:56, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
			::We could distinguish between Elanthia exclusive items, just have two different lists, but on the same page. I think that would make it both inclusive and complete, yet have the distinction at a glance. But I am for including all wood types in Elanthia, exclusive or not.--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 05:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:51, 15 November 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::::::Currently possible to find as in "can be foraged," or currently found in Elanthia, period? The list I had compiled before was the latter of the two. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 05:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)		::::::Currently possible to find as in "can be foraged," or currently found in Elanthia, period? The list I had compiled before was the latter of the two. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 05:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
	:::::::<font color=006600>As in can be acquired in some manner in a raw form. In addition, feel free to add anything that has unique properties associated with it, behaves or is treated differently in Elanthia, or is significant for other reasons. Basically, only add things that have properties not covered by a Wikipedia page on them.-Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 10:35, 15 November 2010 (UTC)</font>		:::::::<font color=006600>As in can be acquired in some manner in a raw form. In addition, feel free to add anything that has unique properties associated with it, behaves or is treated differently in Elanthia, or is significant for other reasons. Basically, only add things that have properties not covered by a Wikipedia page on them.-Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 10:35, 15 November 2010 (UTC)</font>
			::::::::Sorry, Caraamon, but that's not the opinion contributors are expressing here. By and large, the comments above indicate a preference for including both, as Naeya wrote, "exclusive or not." I agree we don't need descriptions or properties for any Real World wood that has no uniquely Elanthian qualities, as most of the comments also say. However, I am going to include them all. I think the best solution for now is to go with two lists, as Naeya suggested. If the release of wood carving, etc, adds more information on all of the "other" woods then I see going somewhere in the direction that metals is, with a separate attribute-table page. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 18:51, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:35, 15 November 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:::::<font color=006600>Very well, it seems most people would like to have other woods included. As a test case, go ahead and include those which are currently possible to find. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 04:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)</font>		:::::<font color=006600>Very well, it seems most people would like to have other woods included. As a test case, go ahead and include those which are currently possible to find. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 04:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)</font>
	::::::Currently possible to find as in "can be foraged," or currently found in Elanthia, period? The list I had compiled before was the latter of the two. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 05:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)		::::::Currently possible to find as in "can be foraged," or currently found in Elanthia, period? The list I had compiled before was the latter of the two. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 05:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
			:::::::<font color=006600>As in can be acquired in some manner in a raw form. In addition, feel free to add anything that has unique properties associated with it, behaves or is treated differently in Elanthia, or is significant for other reasons. Basically, only add things that have properties not covered by a Wikipedia page on them.-Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 10:35, 15 November 2010 (UTC)</font>

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:41, 15 November 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::::I agree with the others. I'd like to see both Elanthia-only <b>and</b> real world woods listed, just with descriptions kept short and primarily for woods only found within the game. <s>However, I think either a new type of table or guideline might be in order for materials if so. If they released appraisals for wood similar to metals, to coincide with carving, the page would quickly become just as much an eyesore as the metals page.</s> (Oh! Nevermind. I see you just changed that page tonight. Great work!) --[[User:Anna Raven\|Anna Raven]] 09:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		::::I agree with the others. I'd like to see both Elanthia-only <b>and</b> real world woods listed, just with descriptions kept short and primarily for woods only found within the game. <s>However, I think either a new type of table or guideline might be in order for materials if so. If they released appraisals for wood similar to metals, to coincide with carving, the page would quickly become just as much an eyesore as the metals page.</s> (Oh! Nevermind. I see you just changed that page tonight. Great work!) --[[User:Anna Raven\|Anna Raven]] 09:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
	:::::<font color=006600>Very well, it seems most people would like to have other woods included. As a test case, go ahead and include those which are currently possible to find. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 04:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)</font>		:::::<font color=006600>Very well, it seems most people would like to have other woods included. As a test case, go ahead and include those which are currently possible to find. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 04:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)</font>
	::::::Currently possible to find as in "can be foraged," or currently found in Elanthia, period? The list before was the latter. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 05:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)		::::::Currently possible to find as in "can be foraged," or currently found in Elanthia, period? The list I had compiled before was the latter of the two. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 05:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:34, 15 November 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::::I agree with the others. I'd like to see both Elanthia-only <b>and</b> real world woods listed, just with descriptions kept short and primarily for woods only found within the game. <s>However, I think either a new type of table or guideline might be in order for materials if so. If they released appraisals for wood similar to metals, to coincide with carving, the page would quickly become just as much an eyesore as the metals page.</s> (Oh! Nevermind. I see you just changed that page tonight. Great work!) --[[User:Anna Raven\|Anna Raven]] 09:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		::::I agree with the others. I'd like to see both Elanthia-only <b>and</b> real world woods listed, just with descriptions kept short and primarily for woods only found within the game. <s>However, I think either a new type of table or guideline might be in order for materials if so. If they released appraisals for wood similar to metals, to coincide with carving, the page would quickly become just as much an eyesore as the metals page.</s> (Oh! Nevermind. I see you just changed that page tonight. Great work!) --[[User:Anna Raven\|Anna Raven]] 09:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
	:::::<font color=006600>Very well, it seems most people would like to have other woods included. As a test case, go ahead and include those which are currently possible to find. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 04:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)</font>		:::::<font color=006600>Very well, it seems most people would like to have other woods included. As a test case, go ahead and include those which are currently possible to find. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 04:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)</font>
			::::::Currently possible to find as in "can be foraged," or currently found in Elanthia, period? The list before was the latter. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 05:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:22, 14 November 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:::My vote is to do what Naeya said, and we can leave the longer descriptions etc for the Elanthia only woods, and have less (or no) description for RL woods. --[[User:Hithrael\|Hithrael]] 05:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		:::My vote is to do what Naeya said, and we can leave the longer descriptions etc for the Elanthia only woods, and have less (or no) description for RL woods. --[[User:Hithrael\|Hithrael]] 05:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
	::::I agree with the others. I'd like to see both Elanthia-only <b>and</b> real world woods listed, just with descriptions kept short and primarily for woods only found within the game. <s>However, I think either a new type of table or guideline might be in order for materials if so. If they released appraisals for wood similar to metals, to coincide with carving, the page would quickly become just as much an eyesore as the metals page.</s> (Oh! Nevermind. I see you just changed that page tonight. Great work!) --[[User:Anna Raven\|Anna Raven]] 09:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		::::I agree with the others. I'd like to see both Elanthia-only <b>and</b> real world woods listed, just with descriptions kept short and primarily for woods only found within the game. <s>However, I think either a new type of table or guideline might be in order for materials if so. If they released appraisals for wood similar to metals, to coincide with carving, the page would quickly become just as much an eyesore as the metals page.</s> (Oh! Nevermind. I see you just changed that page tonight. Great work!) --[[User:Anna Raven\|Anna Raven]] 09:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

			Very well, it seems most people would like to have other woods included. As a test case, go ahead and include those which are currently possible to find. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 04:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)