Talk:Stealing list - Revision history

ISHARON: ISHARON moved page Talk:Stealing List to Talk:Stealing list: capitalization standards

2016-10-25T04:39:19Z

ISHARON moved page Talk:Stealing List to Talk:Stealing list: capitalization standards

← Older revision	Revision as of 23:39, 24 October 2016
(No difference)

Maintenance script at 15:53, 5 September 2010

2010-09-05T15:53:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:53, 5 September 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:

	-Copernicus of TF		-Copernicus of TF
			:The formula for predicted Triviality is:
			:=-55.7206+39.396364LN(APP_KRONARS)+132.56244LN(WEIGHT)+-6.8514022(LN(APP_KRONARS))^2+-47.959502(LN(WEIGHT))^2+-37.686461LN(APP_KRONARS)LN(WEIGHT)+1.8442335(LN(APP_KRONARS)^3)+3.3204806(LN(WEIGHT)^3)+12.48851LN(APP_KRONARS)(LN(WEIGHT)^2)+-0.076300454(LN(APP_KRONARS)^2)LN(WEIGHT)
			:Credit goes to Copernicus of TF for this formula. It is known to not be 100% accurate. [[User:VTCifer\|VTCifer]] 15:53, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

	Yea, this would be great if someone could break it by province. I'd give it a whirl but I've never created wiki pages like that so I'd be afraid of screwing it over. Its at the point where its freezing my browser.		Yea, this would be great if someone could break it by province. I'd give it a whirl but I've never created wiki pages like that so I'd be afraid of screwing it over. Its at the point where its freezing my browser.

Maintenance script at 04:13, 19 July 2009

2009-07-19T04:13:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:13, 18 July 2009
Line 40:		Line 40:

	Not sure if this is helpful, but it appears many items with expected triviality of 47 become truly trivial at 41. [[User:Valtur\|Valtur]] 01:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)		Not sure if this is helpful, but it appears many items with expected triviality of 47 become truly trivial at 41. [[User:Valtur\|Valtur]] 01:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

			Is someone semi-regularly running new regressions on the lists as data comes in? [[User:Renian\|Renian]] 04:13, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Maintenance script: /* Triviality Ranks */

2009-05-31T01:30:56Z

Triviality Ranks

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:30, 30 May 2009
Line 38:		Line 38:

	I can't imagine that they would set capping rank different for other guilds. I would imagine though that these numbers might have changed since the stealing tweak and that some numbers are now invalid. [[User:Jalika\|Jalika]]		I can't imagine that they would set capping rank different for other guilds. I would imagine though that these numbers might have changed since the stealing tweak and that some numbers are now invalid. [[User:Jalika\|Jalika]]

			Not sure if this is helpful, but it appears many items with expected triviality of 47 become truly trivial at 41. [[User:Valtur\|Valtur]] 01:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Maintenance script at 01:04, 9 April 2009

2009-04-09T01:04:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:04, 8 April 2009
Line 36:		Line 36:
	I just got a few more triviality ranks (sling and leather gloves at 110). I really believe we're going to need to add a second triviality rank column for non-thieves, assuming that's the difference.		I just got a few more triviality ranks (sling and leather gloves at 110). I really believe we're going to need to add a second triviality rank column for non-thieves, assuming that's the difference.
	--[[User:Tjorlando\|Tjorlando]] 02:42, 9 February 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:Tjorlando\|Tjorlando]] 02:42, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

			I can't imagine that they would set capping rank different for other guilds. I would imagine though that these numbers might have changed since the stealing tweak and that some numbers are now invalid. [[User:Jalika\|Jalika]]

Maintenance script at 02:42, 9 February 2009

2009-02-09T02:42:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 8 February 2009
Line 33:		Line 33:

	I wonder if when the shops got tweaked (so that a "silk gown" now teaches more than a "gown") if some of the numbers got readjusted. [[User:Jalika\|Jalika]] 02:15, 25 January 2009 (UTC)		I wonder if when the shops got tweaked (so that a "silk gown" now teaches more than a "gown") if some of the numbers got readjusted. [[User:Jalika\|Jalika]] 02:15, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

			I just got a few more triviality ranks (sling and leather gloves at 110). I really believe we're going to need to add a second triviality rank column for non-thieves, assuming that's the difference.
			--[[User:Tjorlando\|Tjorlando]] 02:42, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Maintenance script at 02:15, 25 January 2009

2009-01-25T02:15:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:15, 24 January 2009
Line 31:		Line 31:
	I've just begun practicing stealing, and I've noticed all my triviality ranks are different than the ones posted. (e.g. Crossing, Bard Shop, Carved pick I stopped learning at 66 ranks not 48 which is posted) It's possible guild or agility / reflex ranks will need to be included or standardized for a true triviality rank and a formula for determining trivivality ranks.		I've just begun practicing stealing, and I've noticed all my triviality ranks are different than the ones posted. (e.g. Crossing, Bard Shop, Carved pick I stopped learning at 66 ranks not 48 which is posted) It's possible guild or agility / reflex ranks will need to be included or standardized for a true triviality rank and a formula for determining trivivality ranks.
	--[[User:Tjorlando\|Tjorlando]] 21:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:Tjorlando\|Tjorlando]] 21:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

			I wonder if when the shops got tweaked (so that a "silk gown" now teaches more than a "gown") if some of the numbers got readjusted. [[User:Jalika\|Jalika]] 02:15, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Maintenance script at 21:23, 24 January 2009

2009-01-24T21:23:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:23, 24 January 2009
Line 26:		Line 26:
	On the main page is says triviality rank is the "minimum rank at which an item will not longer teach". Then it says to verify the rank You can learn at x, but x+1 gives trivial message. Is the triviality rank x, or X+1? All those that I have posted have been X+1.		On the main page is says triviality rank is the "minimum rank at which an item will not longer teach". Then it says to verify the rank You can learn at x, but x+1 gives trivial message. Is the triviality rank x, or X+1? All those that I have posted have been X+1.
	[[User:Jalika\|Jalika]] 05:17, 17 January 2009 (UTC)		[[User:Jalika\|Jalika]] 05:17, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

			== Triviality Ranks ==

			I've just begun practicing stealing, and I've noticed all my triviality ranks are different than the ones posted. (e.g. Crossing, Bard Shop, Carved pick I stopped learning at 66 ranks not 48 which is posted) It's possible guild or agility / reflex ranks will need to be included or standardized for a true triviality rank and a formula for determining trivivality ranks.
			--[[User:Tjorlando\|Tjorlando]] 21:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Maintenance script at 05:17, 17 January 2009

2009-01-17T05:17:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:17, 17 January 2009
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Well, I sucked it up and broke them down into provinces. This is my first experience with new pages and links and whatnot so if there are any issues I hope you guys can wrinkle them out. It makes loading/edit much easier.		Well, I sucked it up and broke them down into provinces. This is my first experience with new pages and links and whatnot so if there are any issues I hope you guys can wrinkle them out. It makes loading/edit much easier.
	[[User:Jalika\|Jalika]] 02:18, 17 January 2009 (UTC)		[[User:Jalika\|Jalika]] 02:18, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

			On the main page is says triviality rank is the "minimum rank at which an item will not longer teach". Then it says to verify the rank You can learn at x, but x+1 gives trivial message. Is the triviality rank x, or X+1? All those that I have posted have been X+1.
			[[User:Jalika\|Jalika]] 05:17, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Maintenance script: /* Broke Down List */ new section

2009-01-17T02:18:38Z

Broke Down List: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:18, 16 January 2009
Line 18:		Line 18:

	If you like, I can add a field within the item Infobox where you can put the stealing ranks necessary to grab it, then I could set up a semantic "grab" so you wouldn't have to set up tables of your own. Lemmie know if you'd actually use it. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 01:47, 17 January 2009 (UTC)		If you like, I can add a field within the item Infobox where you can put the stealing ranks necessary to grab it, then I could set up a semantic "grab" so you wouldn't have to set up tables of your own. Lemmie know if you'd actually use it. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 01:47, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

			== Broke Down List ==

			Well, I sucked it up and broke them down into provinces. This is my first experience with new pages and links and whatnot so if there are any issues I hope you guys can wrinkle them out. It makes loading/edit much easier.
			[[User:Jalika\|Jalika]] 02:18, 17 January 2009 (UTC)