Talk:Stance command - Revision history

Maintenance script: /* Formulae post 100? */ new section

2010-02-08T07:49:33Z

Formulae post 100?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:49, 8 February 2010
Line 34:		Line 34:
	::Fair enough.--[[User:Callek\|Callek]] 02:33, 6 March 2009 (UTC)		::Fair enough.--[[User:Callek\|Callek]] 02:33, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
	:::See http://www.play.net/forums/messages.asp?forum=20&category=11&topic=1&message=92 [[User:VTCifer\|VTCifer]] 03:05, 6 March 2009 (UTC)		:::See http://www.play.net/forums/messages.asp?forum=20&category=11&topic=1&message=92 [[User:VTCifer\|VTCifer]] 03:05, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

			== Formulae post 100? ==

			Back when only Barbarians, Paladins and Warmages got them, the stance points changed after 100th. Paladins still got 1 every 10 and Warmages still got 1 every 20, but post 100th Barbarians slowed to 1 every 20. With the current system, does anyone change post 100?

Maintenance script at 03:05, 6 March 2009

2009-03-06T03:05:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:05, 5 March 2009
Line 33:		Line 33:
	</pre>		</pre>
	::Fair enough.--[[User:Callek\|Callek]] 02:33, 6 March 2009 (UTC)		::Fair enough.--[[User:Callek\|Callek]] 02:33, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
			:::See http://www.play.net/forums/messages.asp?forum=20&category=11&topic=1&message=92 [[User:VTCifer\|VTCifer]] 03:05, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

CALLEK at 02:33, 6 March 2009

2009-03-06T02:33:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:33, 5 March 2009
Line 14:		Line 14:
	Yes that is a total of 181 defense! --[[User:Callek\|Callek]] 05:20, 1 March 2009 (UTC)		Yes that is a total of 181 defense! --[[User:Callek\|Callek]] 05:20, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
	:Do me a favor and consult a GM and make sure that's not a character bug? -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 20:51, 1 March 2009 (UTC)		:Do me a favor and consult a GM and make sure that's not a character bug? -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 20:51, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

			::Spoke with GameHost Paksen
			<pre>Paksen says, "OK, I confirmed that you have the correct number of stance points."
			>
			You let out a hearty cheer for Paksen!
			>
			Paksen says, "So you're not bugged."
			>
			You say to Paksen, "unless you care to tell me "why" thats correct, I have nothing further"
			>
			You say, "Though I fully understand why you can't"
			>
			You chuckle.
			>
			Paksen says, "You're not a Warmage, Palidin or Barbarian."
			>
			Paksen says, "I'll let you figure out the rest."
			</pre>
			::Fair enough.--[[User:Callek\|Callek]] 02:33, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

CARAAMON at 20:51, 1 March 2009

2009-03-01T20:51:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 1 March 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Yes that is a total of 181 defense! --[[User:Callek\|Callek]] 05:20, 1 March 2009 (UTC)		Yes that is a total of 181 defense! --[[User:Callek\|Callek]] 05:20, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
			:Do me a favor and consult a GM and make sure that's not a character bug? -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 20:51, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

CALLEK: New page: We need to revisit this thought on total stance points: Name: Gemologist Callek Cronstanarq of the Order of the Apostles Race: Elf Guild: Trader Gender: Male Age: 86 Circle: 35 ...

2009-03-01T05:20:26Z

New page: We need to revisit this thought on total stance points: Name: Gemologist Callek Cronstanarq of the Order of the Apostles Race: Elf Guild: Trader Gender: Male Age: 86 Circle: 35 ...

New page

We need to revisit this thought on total stance points:

Name: Gemologist Callek Cronstanarq of the Order of the Apostles Race: Elf Guild: Trader
Gender: Male Age: 86 Circle: 35

>stance
You are currently using 81% of your evasion skill.
You are currently using 100% of your weapon parry skill.
You are currently using 0% of your shield block skill.
You are attacking with 100% of your offensive skill.

Last Combat Maneuver: Draw

Yes that is a total of 181 defense! --[[User:Callek|Callek]] 05:20, 1 March 2009 (UTC)