Talk:Special materials - Revision history

CARAAMON: CARAAMON moved page Talk:Special Materials to Talk:Special materials

2015-01-20T08:19:43Z

CARAAMON moved page Talk:Special Materials to Talk:Special materials

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:19, 20 January 2015
(No difference)

CARAAMON: /* Exclusive or Inclusive */

2010-12-30T03:03:08Z

Exclusive or Inclusive

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:03, 29 December 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:

	::I notice the Gems & Stone link just goes to the "Stone" page, and there is no Gem listing anymore. Intentional? --[[User:Ysselt\|Ysselt]] 01:11, 30 December 2010 (UTC)		::I notice the Gems & Stone link just goes to the "Stone" page, and there is no Gem listing anymore. Intentional? --[[User:Ysselt\|Ysselt]] 01:11, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
			:The gems have been gone for a while, separated to their own pages. With the upcoming changes to special metals, I'm thinking we may want to reverse the trend of so many items on one page. I'm going to think about it, but I certainly won't object if someone wants to start on it. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 03:03, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Maintenance script at 01:11, 30 December 2010

2010-12-30T01:11:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, 29 December 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:I'll tentatively agree to it. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 12:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)		:I'll tentatively agree to it. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 12:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
	::Alright, then unless there are objections by anyone who cares, here's what I'd like to do: Merge Category:Substances and [[Special Materials]] into a new Category:Materials that would link to the pages for Fabric, Wood, Stone, Metal, etc, and the few uncategorized materials (Tzgaa? Neitrice?), and then contain all of the individual pages for those materials that have them. Right now, that's mostly just gemstones. Perhaps an "alteration" section on this new page would be useful, too, just as a list of all the materials that must be provided for alterations. No new information would go into it, the list items would just link to their respective pages. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 16:44, 13 November 2010 (UTC)		::Alright, then unless there are objections by anyone who cares, here's what I'd like to do: Merge Category:Substances and [[Special Materials]] into a new Category:Materials that would link to the pages for Fabric, Wood, Stone, Metal, etc, and the few uncategorized materials (Tzgaa? Neitrice?), and then contain all of the individual pages for those materials that have them. Right now, that's mostly just gemstones. Perhaps an "alteration" section on this new page would be useful, too, just as a list of all the materials that must be provided for alterations. No new information would go into it, the list items would just link to their respective pages. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 16:44, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

			::I notice the Gems & Stone link just goes to the "Stone" page, and there is no Gem listing anymore. Intentional? --[[User:Ysselt\|Ysselt]] 01:11, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

HRODBERACHT: oops

2010-11-13T16:46:56Z

oops

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:46, 13 November 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	I think we should do away with the "Special" on this page, and use it more to talk about "materials" in general. We're getting more and more materials, and likely the list is going to keep growing. When crafting finally arrives, it will be a useful page for briefly talking about the different materials that can be foraged, mined, harvested, worked, used in alterations, etc.-[[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 02:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)		I think we should do away with the "Special" on this page, and use it more to talk about "materials" in general. We're getting more and more materials, and likely the list is going to keep growing. When crafting finally arrives, it will be a useful page for briefly talking about the different materials that can be foraged, mined, harvested, worked, used in alterations, etc.-[[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 02:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
	:I'll tentatively agree to it. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 12:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)		:I'll tentatively agree to it. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 12:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
	::Alright, then unless there are objections by anyone who cares, here's what I'd like to do: Merge [[Category:Substances]] and [[Special Materials]] into a new [[Category:Materials]] that would link to the pages for Fabric, Wood, Stone, Metal, etc, and the few uncategorized materials (Tzgaa? Neitrice?), and then contain all of the individual pages for those materials that have them. Right now, that's mostly just gemstones. Perhaps an "alteration" section on this new page would be useful, too, just as a list of all the materials that must be provided for alterations. No new information would go into it, the list items would just link to their respective pages. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 16:44, 13 November 2010 (UTC)		::Alright, then unless there are objections by anyone who cares, here's what I'd like to do: Merge Category:Substances and [[Special Materials]] into a new Category:Materials that would link to the pages for Fabric, Wood, Stone, Metal, etc, and the few uncategorized materials (Tzgaa? Neitrice?), and then contain all of the individual pages for those materials that have them. Right now, that's mostly just gemstones. Perhaps an "alteration" section on this new page would be useful, too, just as a list of all the materials that must be provided for alterations. No new information would go into it, the list items would just link to their respective pages. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 16:44, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

HRODBERACHT: /* Exclusive or Inclusive */

2010-11-13T16:44:50Z

Exclusive or Inclusive

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:44, 13 November 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	I think we should do away with the "Special" on this page, and use it more to talk about "materials" in general. We're getting more and more materials, and likely the list is going to keep growing. When crafting finally arrives, it will be a useful page for briefly talking about the different materials that can be foraged, mined, harvested, worked, used in alterations, etc.-[[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 02:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)		I think we should do away with the "Special" on this page, and use it more to talk about "materials" in general. We're getting more and more materials, and likely the list is going to keep growing. When crafting finally arrives, it will be a useful page for briefly talking about the different materials that can be foraged, mined, harvested, worked, used in alterations, etc.-[[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 02:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
	:I'll tentatively agree to it. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 12:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)		:I'll tentatively agree to it. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 12:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
			::Alright, then unless there are objections by anyone who cares, here's what I'd like to do: Merge [[Category:Substances]] and [[Special Materials]] into a new [[Category:Materials]] that would link to the pages for Fabric, Wood, Stone, Metal, etc, and the few uncategorized materials (Tzgaa? Neitrice?), and then contain all of the individual pages for those materials that have them. Right now, that's mostly just gemstones. Perhaps an "alteration" section on this new page would be useful, too, just as a list of all the materials that must be provided for alterations. No new information would go into it, the list items would just link to their respective pages. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 16:44, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

CARAAMON at 12:04, 13 November 2010

2010-11-13T12:04:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:04, 13 November 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	==Exclusive or Inclusive==		==Exclusive or Inclusive==
	I think we should do away with the "Special" on this page, and use it more to talk about "materials" in general. We're getting more and more materials, and likely the list is going to keep growing. When crafting finally arrives, it will be a useful page for briefly talking about the different materials that can be foraged, mined, harvested, worked, used in alterations, etc.-[[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 02:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)		I think we should do away with the "Special" on this page, and use it more to talk about "materials" in general. We're getting more and more materials, and likely the list is going to keep growing. When crafting finally arrives, it will be a useful page for briefly talking about the different materials that can be foraged, mined, harvested, worked, used in alterations, etc.-[[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 02:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
			:I'll tentatively agree to it. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 12:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

HRODBERACHT at 02:55, 9 November 2010

2010-11-09T02:55:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:55, 8 November 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::I disagree, I think that every separate theme should have it's own page. Just because we don't have a lot of information doesn't mean we won't eventually. But I shall bow to the majority. -[[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 19:39, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		::I disagree, I think that every separate theme should have it's own page. Just because we don't have a lot of information doesn't mean we won't eventually. But I shall bow to the majority. -[[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 19:39, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
	:::When we do, to the point that the article becomes more cumbersome and lengthy than it should be, then I will agree. Until then, I think this format works with the scant information we have. It's not like we can't change it at a later date. =) [[User:Reene\|Reene]] 03:09, 31 July 2008 (CDT)		:::When we do, to the point that the article becomes more cumbersome and lengthy than it should be, then I will agree. Until then, I think this format works with the scant information we have. It's not like we can't change it at a later date. =) [[User:Reene\|Reene]] 03:09, 31 July 2008 (CDT)


			==Exclusive or Inclusive==
			I think we should do away with the "Special" on this page, and use it more to talk about "materials" in general. We're getting more and more materials, and likely the list is going to keep growing. When crafting finally arrives, it will be a useful page for briefly talking about the different materials that can be foraged, mined, harvested, worked, used in alterations, etc.-[[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 02:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Maintenance script: /* Break Up */

2008-07-31T08:09:16Z

Break Up

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:09, 31 July 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I disagree as well. There is not enough information about each individual material to constitute individual articles for everything. I agree with Reene in that something that has a lot of information can have it's own page... otherwise... let's not get carried away coughs Titles coughs--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 23:19, 29 July 2008 (CDT)		:I disagree as well. There is not enough information about each individual material to constitute individual articles for everything. I agree with Reene in that something that has a lot of information can have it's own page... otherwise... let's not get carried away coughs Titles coughs--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 23:19, 29 July 2008 (CDT)
	::I disagree, I think that every separate theme should have it's own page. Just because we don't have a lot of information doesn't mean we won't eventually. But I shall bow to the majority. -[[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 19:39, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		::I disagree, I think that every separate theme should have it's own page. Just because we don't have a lot of information doesn't mean we won't eventually. But I shall bow to the majority. -[[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 19:39, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
			:::When we do, to the point that the article becomes more cumbersome and lengthy than it should be, then I will agree. Until then, I think this format works with the scant information we have. It's not like we can't change it at a later date. =) [[User:Reene\|Reene]] 03:09, 31 July 2008 (CDT)

CARAAMON at 00:39, 31 July 2008

2008-07-31T00:39:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:39, 30 July 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:I disagree. I dislike the trend on the wiki of breaking up every single individual aspect of a topic into its own article; it makes the wiki harder to read, harder to navigate and harder to find what you're looking for. There should be redirects for each material that point to the appropriate sections on this page. The exception should be when there is a great deal of additional information on one thing, ala [[chakrel]]. [[User:Reene\|Reene]] 22:38, 29 July 2008 (CDT)		:I disagree. I dislike the trend on the wiki of breaking up every single individual aspect of a topic into its own article; it makes the wiki harder to read, harder to navigate and harder to find what you're looking for. There should be redirects for each material that point to the appropriate sections on this page. The exception should be when there is a great deal of additional information on one thing, ala [[chakrel]]. [[User:Reene\|Reene]] 22:38, 29 July 2008 (CDT)
	:I disagree as well. There is not enough information about each individual material to constitute individual articles for everything. I agree with Reene in that something that has a lot of information can have it's own page... otherwise... let's not get carried away coughs Titles coughs--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 23:19, 29 July 2008 (CDT)		:I disagree as well. There is not enough information about each individual material to constitute individual articles for everything. I agree with Reene in that something that has a lot of information can have it's own page... otherwise... let's not get carried away coughs Titles coughs--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 23:19, 29 July 2008 (CDT)
			::I disagree, I think that every separate theme should have it's own page. Just because we don't have a lot of information doesn't mean we won't eventually. But I shall bow to the majority. -[[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 19:39, 30 July 2008 (CDT)

Maintenance script: /* Break Up */

2008-07-30T04:19:28Z

Break Up

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:19, 29 July 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:
	This should be broken into individual articles. -[[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 17:10, 29 July 2008 (CDT)		This should be broken into individual articles. -[[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 17:10, 29 July 2008 (CDT)
	:I disagree. I dislike the trend on the wiki of breaking up every single individual aspect of a topic into its own article; it makes the wiki harder to read, harder to navigate and harder to find what you're looking for. There should be redirects for each material that point to the appropriate sections on this page. The exception should be when there is a great deal of additional information on one thing, ala [[chakrel]]. [[User:Reene\|Reene]] 22:38, 29 July 2008 (CDT)		:I disagree. I dislike the trend on the wiki of breaking up every single individual aspect of a topic into its own article; it makes the wiki harder to read, harder to navigate and harder to find what you're looking for. There should be redirects for each material that point to the appropriate sections on this page. The exception should be when there is a great deal of additional information on one thing, ala [[chakrel]]. [[User:Reene\|Reene]] 22:38, 29 July 2008 (CDT)
			:I disagree as well. There is not enough information about each individual material to constitute individual articles for everything. I agree with Reene in that something that has a lot of information can have it's own page... otherwise... let's not get carried away coughs Titles coughs--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 23:19, 29 July 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, 29 December 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:I'll tentatively agree to it. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 12:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)		:I'll tentatively agree to it. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 12:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
	::Alright, then unless there are objections by anyone who cares, here's what I'd like to do: Merge Category:Substances and [[Special Materials]] into a new Category:Materials that would link to the pages for Fabric, Wood, Stone, Metal, etc, and the few uncategorized materials (Tzgaa? Neitrice?), and then contain all of the individual pages for those materials that have them. Right now, that's mostly just gemstones. Perhaps an "alteration" section on this new page would be useful, too, just as a list of all the materials that must be provided for alterations. No new information would go into it, the list items would just link to their respective pages. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 16:44, 13 November 2010 (UTC)		::Alright, then unless there are objections by anyone who cares, here's what I'd like to do: Merge Category:Substances and [[Special Materials]] into a new Category:Materials that would link to the pages for Fabric, Wood, Stone, Metal, etc, and the few uncategorized materials (Tzgaa? Neitrice?), and then contain all of the individual pages for those materials that have them. Right now, that's mostly just gemstones. Perhaps an "alteration" section on this new page would be useful, too, just as a list of all the materials that must be provided for alterations. No new information would go into it, the list items would just link to their respective pages. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 16:44, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

			::I notice the Gems & Stone link just goes to the "Stone" page, and there is no Gem listing anymore. Intentional? --[[User:Ysselt\|Ysselt]] 01:11, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:46, 13 November 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	I think we should do away with the "Special" on this page, and use it more to talk about "materials" in general. We're getting more and more materials, and likely the list is going to keep growing. When crafting finally arrives, it will be a useful page for briefly talking about the different materials that can be foraged, mined, harvested, worked, used in alterations, etc.-[[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 02:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)		I think we should do away with the "Special" on this page, and use it more to talk about "materials" in general. We're getting more and more materials, and likely the list is going to keep growing. When crafting finally arrives, it will be a useful page for briefly talking about the different materials that can be foraged, mined, harvested, worked, used in alterations, etc.-[[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 02:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
	:I'll tentatively agree to it. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 12:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)		:I'll tentatively agree to it. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 12:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
	::Alright, then unless there are objections by anyone who cares, here's what I'd like to do: Merge [[Category:Substances]] and [[Special Materials]] into a new [[Category:Materials]] that would link to the pages for Fabric, Wood, Stone, Metal, etc, and the few uncategorized materials (Tzgaa? Neitrice?), and then contain all of the individual pages for those materials that have them. Right now, that's mostly just gemstones. Perhaps an "alteration" section on this new page would be useful, too, just as a list of all the materials that must be provided for alterations. No new information would go into it, the list items would just link to their respective pages. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 16:44, 13 November 2010 (UTC)		::Alright, then unless there are objections by anyone who cares, here's what I'd like to do: Merge Category:Substances and [[Special Materials]] into a new Category:Materials that would link to the pages for Fabric, Wood, Stone, Metal, etc, and the few uncategorized materials (Tzgaa? Neitrice?), and then contain all of the individual pages for those materials that have them. Right now, that's mostly just gemstones. Perhaps an "alteration" section on this new page would be useful, too, just as a list of all the materials that must be provided for alterations. No new information would go into it, the list items would just link to their respective pages. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 16:44, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:44, 13 November 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	I think we should do away with the "Special" on this page, and use it more to talk about "materials" in general. We're getting more and more materials, and likely the list is going to keep growing. When crafting finally arrives, it will be a useful page for briefly talking about the different materials that can be foraged, mined, harvested, worked, used in alterations, etc.-[[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 02:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)		I think we should do away with the "Special" on this page, and use it more to talk about "materials" in general. We're getting more and more materials, and likely the list is going to keep growing. When crafting finally arrives, it will be a useful page for briefly talking about the different materials that can be foraged, mined, harvested, worked, used in alterations, etc.-[[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 02:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
	:I'll tentatively agree to it. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 12:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)		:I'll tentatively agree to it. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 12:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
			::Alright, then unless there are objections by anyone who cares, here's what I'd like to do: Merge [[Category:Substances]] and [[Special Materials]] into a new [[Category:Materials]] that would link to the pages for Fabric, Wood, Stone, Metal, etc, and the few uncategorized materials (Tzgaa? Neitrice?), and then contain all of the individual pages for those materials that have them. Right now, that's mostly just gemstones. Perhaps an "alteration" section on this new page would be useful, too, just as a list of all the materials that must be provided for alterations. No new information would go into it, the list items would just link to their respective pages. - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 16:44, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:09, 31 July 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I disagree as well. There is not enough information about each individual material to constitute individual articles for everything. I agree with Reene in that something that has a lot of information can have it's own page... otherwise... let's not get carried away coughs Titles coughs--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 23:19, 29 July 2008 (CDT)		:I disagree as well. There is not enough information about each individual material to constitute individual articles for everything. I agree with Reene in that something that has a lot of information can have it's own page... otherwise... let's not get carried away coughs Titles coughs--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 23:19, 29 July 2008 (CDT)
	::I disagree, I think that every separate theme should have it's own page. Just because we don't have a lot of information doesn't mean we won't eventually. But I shall bow to the majority. -[[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 19:39, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		::I disagree, I think that every separate theme should have it's own page. Just because we don't have a lot of information doesn't mean we won't eventually. But I shall bow to the majority. -[[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 19:39, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
			:::When we do, to the point that the article becomes more cumbersome and lengthy than it should be, then I will agree. Until then, I think this format works with the scant information we have. It's not like we can't change it at a later date. =) [[User:Reene\|Reene]] 03:09, 31 July 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:39, 30 July 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:I disagree. I dislike the trend on the wiki of breaking up every single individual aspect of a topic into its own article; it makes the wiki harder to read, harder to navigate and harder to find what you're looking for. There should be redirects for each material that point to the appropriate sections on this page. The exception should be when there is a great deal of additional information on one thing, ala [[chakrel]]. [[User:Reene\|Reene]] 22:38, 29 July 2008 (CDT)		:I disagree. I dislike the trend on the wiki of breaking up every single individual aspect of a topic into its own article; it makes the wiki harder to read, harder to navigate and harder to find what you're looking for. There should be redirects for each material that point to the appropriate sections on this page. The exception should be when there is a great deal of additional information on one thing, ala [[chakrel]]. [[User:Reene\|Reene]] 22:38, 29 July 2008 (CDT)
	:I disagree as well. There is not enough information about each individual material to constitute individual articles for everything. I agree with Reene in that something that has a lot of information can have it's own page... otherwise... let's not get carried away coughs Titles coughs--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 23:19, 29 July 2008 (CDT)		:I disagree as well. There is not enough information about each individual material to constitute individual articles for everything. I agree with Reene in that something that has a lot of information can have it's own page... otherwise... let's not get carried away coughs Titles coughs--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 23:19, 29 July 2008 (CDT)
			::I disagree, I think that every separate theme should have it's own page. Just because we don't have a lot of information doesn't mean we won't eventually. But I shall bow to the majority. -[[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 19:39, 30 July 2008 (CDT)