Talk:Runestones - Revision history

RCANINE: /* Appears outdated */

2017-09-06T16:21:56Z

Appears outdated

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:21, 6 September 2017
Line 51:		Line 51:

	It appears this area and the main runestone page are outdated with the 3.1 rune/stone changes. I don't know how to mark a page as outdated, so I'll just try to fix the ones for the runestones I currently have.		It appears this area and the main runestone page are outdated with the 3.1 rune/stone changes. I don't know how to mark a page as outdated, so I'll just try to fix the ones for the runestones I currently have.

			Here's some that I have:

			* You tap a colorful elbaite runestone marked with a symbol for Ease Burden that you are holding.
			* You tap a pale avaes runestone marked with a symbol for Clear Vision that you are holding.
			* You tap an ilmenite runestone marked with a symbol for Clear Vision that you are holding.

			My skills aren't high enough yet to get muchinformation from them.

			[[User:RCANINE\|RCANINE]] ([[User talk:RCANINE\|talk]]) 11:21, 6 September 2017 (CDT)

	== Runestones Futile For Casting Spells? ==		== Runestones Futile For Casting Spells? ==

KASHNA: /* Runestones Futile For Casting Spells? */

2016-05-30T23:08:33Z

Runestones Futile For Casting Spells?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:08, 30 May 2016
Line 53:		Line 53:

	== Runestones Futile For Casting Spells? ==		== Runestones Futile For Casting Spells? ==
	With 140+ primary magic, attunement and arcana, along with 74 sorcery, my cleric produces a hopeless backfire on a minimum prep invocation of the Pale Aves Runestone (Clear Vision). If this is the case, what in the world is required to actually successfully use a runestone? ...such a crazy steep requirement... [[KASHNA\|Kashna]] 18:13, May 30, 2016<br><br>		With 140+ primary magic, attunement and arcana, along with 74 sorcery, my cleric produces a hopeless backfire on a minimum prep invocation of the Pale Aves Runestone (Clear Vision). If this is the case, what in the world is required to actually successfully use a runestone? ...such a crazy steep requirement... [[User:KASHNA\|Kashna]] ([[User talk:KASHNA\|talk]]) 18:13, May 30, 2016<br><br>
	:Most (currently all?) runestones are not actually invoked at minimum prep. They typically are prepared with 20 mana when you invoke them. You can check by using PERC or CONC after you have invoked it to see a line about how much mana you are preparing it with. Depending on the spell, that could mean upwards of 200-250 sorcery skill to cast. Just a guesstimate for that mana amount, the actual requirements might vary.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 17:49, 30 May 2016 (CDT)		:Most (currently all?) runestones are not actually invoked at minimum prep. They typically are prepared with 20 mana when you invoke them. You can check by using PERC or CONC after you have invoked it to see a line about how much mana you are preparing it with. Depending on the spell, that could mean upwards of 200-250 sorcery skill to cast. Just a guesstimate for that mana amount, the actual requirements might vary.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 17:49, 30 May 2016 (CDT)

ABSOLON: /* Runestones Futile For Casting Spells? */

2016-05-30T22:49:20Z

Runestones Futile For Casting Spells?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:49, 30 May 2016
Line 54:		Line 54:
	== Runestones Futile For Casting Spells? ==		== Runestones Futile For Casting Spells? ==
	With 140+ primary magic, attunement and arcana, along with 74 sorcery, my cleric produces a hopeless backfire on a minimum prep invocation of the Pale Aves Runestone (Clear Vision). If this is the case, what in the world is required to actually successfully use a runestone? ...such a crazy steep requirement... [[KASHNA\|Kashna]] 18:13, May 30, 2016<br><br>		With 140+ primary magic, attunement and arcana, along with 74 sorcery, my cleric produces a hopeless backfire on a minimum prep invocation of the Pale Aves Runestone (Clear Vision). If this is the case, what in the world is required to actually successfully use a runestone? ...such a crazy steep requirement... [[KASHNA\|Kashna]] 18:13, May 30, 2016<br><br>
			:Most (currently all?) runestones are not actually invoked at minimum prep. They typically are prepared with 20 mana when you invoke them. You can check by using PERC or CONC after you have invoked it to see a line about how much mana you are preparing it with. Depending on the spell, that could mean upwards of 200-250 sorcery skill to cast. Just a guesstimate for that mana amount, the actual requirements might vary.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 17:49, 30 May 2016 (CDT)

KASHNA: rtoc

2016-05-30T22:16:21Z

rtoc

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:16, 30 May 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{RTOC}}
	==Collecting some data here.==		==Collecting some data here.==
	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"

KASHNA: What-s required to successfully cast a spell from a runestone?

2016-05-30T22:14:10Z

What-s required to successfully cast a spell from a runestone?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:14, 30 May 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Collecting some data here.		==Collecting some data here.==
	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
	\|-		\|-
Line 50:		Line 50:

	It appears this area and the main runestone page are outdated with the 3.1 rune/stone changes. I don't know how to mark a page as outdated, so I'll just try to fix the ones for the runestones I currently have.		It appears this area and the main runestone page are outdated with the 3.1 rune/stone changes. I don't know how to mark a page as outdated, so I'll just try to fix the ones for the runestones I currently have.

			== Runestones Futile For Casting Spells? ==
			With 140+ primary magic, attunement and arcana, along with 74 sorcery, my cleric produces a hopeless backfire on a minimum prep invocation of the Pale Aves Runestone (Clear Vision). If this is the case, what in the world is required to actually successfully use a runestone? ...such a crazy steep requirement... [[KASHNA\|Kashna]] 18:13, May 30, 2016<br><br>

SZODRIN: /* Appears outdated */ new section

2015-12-01T23:16:17Z

Appears outdated: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:16, 1 December 2015
Line 46:		Line 46:

	[[User:VAGELO\|[[User:Ndin\|Ndin]] ([[User talk:Ndin\|talk]])]] ([[User talk:VAGELO\|talk]]) 23:09, 12 August 2015 (CDT)		[[User:VAGELO\|[[User:Ndin\|Ndin]] ([[User talk:Ndin\|talk]])]] ([[User talk:VAGELO\|talk]]) 23:09, 12 August 2015 (CDT)

			== Appears outdated ==

			It appears this area and the main runestone page are outdated with the 3.1 rune/stone changes. I don't know how to mark a page as outdated, so I'll just try to fix the ones for the runestones I currently have.

VAGELO at 04:09, 13 August 2015

2015-08-13T04:09:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:09, 12 August 2015
Line 36:		Line 36:

	-- Hobris, June 17, 2014		-- Hobris, June 17, 2014

			Just went to check the new runes sold in Shard.

			Electrum Runestone (Eagle's Cry)
			Topaz Runestone (Protection From Evil)
			Quartz Runestone (Refresh)

			All three runes were 6 more uses.

			[[User:VAGELO\|[[User:Ndin\|Ndin]] ([[User talk:Ndin\|talk]])]] ([[User talk:VAGELO\|talk]]) 23:09, 12 August 2015 (CDT)

KCM101 at 05:40, 17 June 2014

2014-06-17T05:40:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:40, 17 June 2014
Line 31:		Line 31:

	--[[User:Alphonsis\|Alphonsis]] 8:40, 30 January 2013 (PST)		--[[User:Alphonsis\|Alphonsis]] 8:40, 30 January 2013 (PST)

			general data, specifics to come.
			assuming the sorcery cap is higher on runestones that give more experience, the following list shows least to greatest: rhodonite, imnera, calavarite.

			-- Hobris, June 17, 2014

Maintenance script at 16:40, 30 January 2013

2013-01-30T16:40:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:40, 30 January 2013
Line 27:		Line 27:
	\|}		\|}
	--[[User:Antendren\|Antendren]] 14:25, 2 August 2010 (UTC)		--[[User:Antendren\|Antendren]] 14:25, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

			Checked my Elbaite runestone and it has the Instinct spell in it, so I updated the table.

			--[[User:Alphonsis\|Alphonsis]] 8:40, 30 January 2013 (PST)

Maintenance script at 06:15, 13 August 2010

2010-08-13T06:15:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:15, 13 August 2010
Line 22:		Line 22:
	\| Avaes		\| Avaes
	\| 7		\| 7
			\|-
			\| Azurite
			\| 8
	\|}		\|}
	--[[User:Antendren\|Antendren]] 14:25, 2 August 2010 (UTC)		--[[User:Antendren\|Antendren]] 14:25, 2 August 2010 (UTC)