Talk:Revenant conscript - Revision history

GREENBLACK at 23:30, 3 August 2019

2019-08-03T23:30:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:30, 3 August 2019
Line 17:		Line 17:
	==These Are More Like Crazed Madmen==		==These Are More Like Crazed Madmen==

	I adjusted their Min/Max skill ranges to be more in line with their current performance. Madmen have 15 listed as Min skill, and conscripts may well be that level as well, but my weapons were 25ish when I went there, so I'm limiting my Min adjustment to 25.		I adjusted their Min/Max skill ranges to be more in line with their current performance. Madmen have 15 listed as Min skill, and conscripts may well be that level as well, but my weapons were 25ish when I went there, so I'm limiting my Min adjustment to 25. [[User:GREENBLACK\|GREENBLACK]] ([[User talk:GREENBLACK\|talk]]) 18:30, 3 August 2019 (CDT)

2019-08-03T23:29:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:29, 3 August 2019
Line 14:		Line 14:
	E.-		E.-
	:I also '''thought''' they used to be corporeal, but I recall recently having my weapons slide right through them after a while without refreshing my bless. No idea if its a bug --[[User:Callek\|Callek]] 16:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC)		:I also '''thought''' they used to be corporeal, but I recall recently having my weapons slide right through them after a while without refreshing my bless. No idea if its a bug --[[User:Callek\|Callek]] 16:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

			==These Are More Like Crazed Madmen==

			I adjusted their Min/Max skill ranges to be more in line with their current performance. Madmen have 15 listed as Min skill, and conscripts may well be that level as well, but my weapons were 25ish when I went there, so I'm limiting my Min adjustment to 25.

2017-09-13T05:39:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:39, 13 September 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:--[[User:Kittn\|Kittn]] 20:06, 22 February 2008 (CST)		:--[[User:Kittn\|Kittn]] 20:06, 22 February 2008 (CST)
	I'm backtraining on these, and had shield finally cap out at 60 on them, so defenses may have an upper limit of 60. -- [[User:Uthrecht\|Uthrecht]] 21:53, 3 July 2008 (CDT)		I'm backtraining on these, and had shield finally cap out at 60 on them, so defenses may have an upper limit of 60. -- [[User:Uthrecht\|Uthrecht]] 21:53, 3 July 2008 (CDT)

			Hit a weapon soft cap at 49
			[[User:RCANINE\|RCANINE]] ([[User talk:RCANINE\|talk]]) 00:39, 13 September 2017 (CDT)

	== Are they still corporeal? ==		== Are they still corporeal? ==

2016-10-17T13:38:01Z

← Older revision

Revision as of 08:38, 17 October 2016

2009-03-29T16:03:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:03, 29 March 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Someone might want to double check this in case something was wrong. I've tried twice with same result.		Someone might want to double check this in case something was wrong. I've tried twice with same result.

			E.-
	:I also '''thought''' they used to be corporeal, but I recall recently having my weapons slide right through them after a while without refreshing my bless. No idea if its a bug --[[User:Callek\|Callek]] 16:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC)		:I also '''thought''' they used to be corporeal, but I recall recently having my weapons slide right through them after a while without refreshing my bless. No idea if its a bug --[[User:Callek\|Callek]] 16:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

2009-03-29T16:02:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:02, 29 March 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Someone might want to double check this in case something was wrong. I've tried twice with same result.		Someone might want to double check this in case something was wrong. I've tried twice with same result.

			:I also '''thought''' they used to be corporeal, but I recall recently having my weapons slide right through them after a while without refreshing my bless. No idea if its a bug --[[User:Callek\|Callek]] 16:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
	E.-

2009-03-29T06:07:29Z

Are they still corporeal?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:07, 29 March 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:--[[User:Kittn\|Kittn]] 20:06, 22 February 2008 (CST)		:--[[User:Kittn\|Kittn]] 20:06, 22 February 2008 (CST)
	I'm backtraining on these, and had shield finally cap out at 60 on them, so defenses may have an upper limit of 60. -- [[User:Uthrecht\|Uthrecht]] 21:53, 3 July 2008 (CDT)		I'm backtraining on these, and had shield finally cap out at 60 on them, so defenses may have an upper limit of 60. -- [[User:Uthrecht\|Uthrecht]] 21:53, 3 July 2008 (CDT)

			== Are they still corporeal? ==

			I recently took a new Barbarian to these. I used to hunt them with non-blessed weapons quite successfully. Now my weapons pass right through them doing no damage of any kind.

			Someone might want to double check this in case something was wrong. I've tried twice with same result.

			E.-

2008-07-04T02:53:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:53, 3 July 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Copied and pasted from Revenant Warrior, then redirected. My baby cleric is fighting these now, and I found Revenant Warrior to be misleading since the critter name is actually revenant conscript. I'll change it back if anyone has problems with it this way.		Copied and pasted from Revenant Warrior, then redirected. My baby cleric is fighting these now, and I found Revenant Warrior to be misleading since the critter name is actually revenant conscript. I'll change it back if anyone has problems with it this way.
	:--[[User:Kittn\|Kittn]] 20:06, 22 February 2008 (CST)		:--[[User:Kittn\|Kittn]] 20:06, 22 February 2008 (CST)
	I'm backtraining on these, and had shield finally cap out at 60 on them, so defenses may have an upper limit of 60. --21:53, 3 July 2008 (CDT)		I'm backtraining on these, and had shield finally cap out at 60 on them, so defenses may have an upper limit of 60. -- [[User:Uthrecht\|Uthrecht]] 21:53, 3 July 2008 (CDT)

2008-07-04T02:53:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:53, 3 July 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Copied and pasted from Revenant Warrior, then redirected. My baby cleric is fighting these now, and I found Revenant Warrior to be misleading since the critter name is actually revenant conscript. I'll change it back if anyone has problems with it this way.		Copied and pasted from Revenant Warrior, then redirected. My baby cleric is fighting these now, and I found Revenant Warrior to be misleading since the critter name is actually revenant conscript. I'll change it back if anyone has problems with it this way.
	:--[[User:Kittn\|Kittn]] 20:06, 22 February 2008 (CST)		:--[[User:Kittn\|Kittn]] 20:06, 22 February 2008 (CST)
			I'm backtraining on these, and had shield finally cap out at 60 on them, so defenses may have an upper limit of 60. --21:53, 3 July 2008 (CDT)

2008-06-30T02:01:03Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 21:01, 29 June 2008
(No difference)