Talk:Red-Gold scaled atik'et (2) - Revision history

TEVESHSZAT: TEVESHSZAT moved page Talk:Red-Gold Scaled Atik'et (2) to Talk:Red-Gold scaled atik'et (2)

2016-10-17T13:37:48Z

TEVESHSZAT moved page Talk:Red-Gold Scaled Atik'et (2) to Talk:Red-Gold scaled atik'et (2)

← Older revision	Revision as of 08:37, 17 October 2016
(No difference)

FROSC02 at 19:56, 13 December 2015

2015-12-13T19:56:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:56, 13 December 2015
Line 16:		Line 16:
	[[User:FROSC02\|FROSC02]] ([[User talk:FROSC02\|talk]])		[[User:FROSC02\|FROSC02]] ([[User talk:FROSC02\|talk]])

	Estimating 425 for max cap; still teaches defences at ~~~390-~~400 but extremely slowly.<br />		Estimating 425 for max cap; still teaches defences at ~400 but extremely slowly.<br />
	[[User:FROSC02\|FROSC02]] ([[User talk:FROSC02\|talk]])		[[User:FROSC02\|FROSC02]] ([[User talk:FROSC02\|talk]])

FROSC02 at 19:55, 13 December 2015

2015-12-13T19:55:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:55, 13 December 2015
Line 16:		Line 16:
	[[User:FROSC02\|FROSC02]] ([[User talk:FROSC02\|talk]])		[[User:FROSC02\|FROSC02]] ([[User talk:FROSC02\|talk]])

	Estimating 425 for max cap; teaches defences at ~390-400 but extremely slowly.<br />		Estimating 425 for max cap; still teaches defences at ~390-400 but extremely slowly.<br />
	[[User:FROSC02\|FROSC02]] ([[User talk:FROSC02\|talk]])		[[User:FROSC02\|FROSC02]] ([[User talk:FROSC02\|talk]])

FROSC02 at 19:55, 13 December 2015

2015-12-13T19:55:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:55, 13 December 2015
Line 16:		Line 16:
	[[User:FROSC02\|FROSC02]] ([[User talk:FROSC02\|talk]])		[[User:FROSC02\|FROSC02]] ([[User talk:FROSC02\|talk]])

	Estimating 425 for max cap; teaches defences at ~390-400 but extremely slowly.		Estimating 425 for max cap; teaches defences at ~390-400 but extremely slowly.<br />
	[[User:FROSC02\|FROSC02]] ([[User talk:FROSC02\|talk]])		[[User:FROSC02\|FROSC02]] ([[User talk:FROSC02\|talk]])

FROSC02 at 19:55, 13 December 2015

2015-12-13T19:55:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:55, 13 December 2015
Line 16:		Line 16:
	[[User:FROSC02\|FROSC02]] ([[User talk:FROSC02\|talk]])		[[User:FROSC02\|FROSC02]] ([[User talk:FROSC02\|talk]])

	Estimating 425 for max cap; teaches defences at ~~mid~~ 390's but extremely slowly.		Estimating 425 for max cap; teaches defences at ~390-400 but extremely slowly.
	[[User:FROSC02\|FROSC02]] ([[User talk:FROSC02\|talk]])		[[User:FROSC02\|FROSC02]] ([[User talk:FROSC02\|talk]])

FROSC02 at 19:54, 13 December 2015

2015-12-13T19:54:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:54, 13 December 2015
Line 14:		Line 14:
	If you attempted to debilitate the enemy, you are certain that it would train acceptably (332).<br />		If you attempted to debilitate the enemy, you are certain that it would train acceptably (332).<br />
	The atik'et appears immune to fire.<br />		The atik'et appears immune to fire.<br />
			[[User:FROSC02\|FROSC02]] ([[User talk:FROSC02\|talk]])

			Estimating 425 for max cap; teaches defences at mid 390's but extremely slowly.
	[[User:FROSC02\|FROSC02]] ([[User talk:FROSC02\|talk]])		[[User:FROSC02\|FROSC02]] ([[User talk:FROSC02\|talk]])

FROSC02 at 19:53, 13 December 2015

2015-12-13T19:53:17Z

FROSC02: Created page with "You are certain that it is somewhat weaker than you are (50). You are certain that it is somewhat less agile than you are (50). You are certain that it is somewhat less discip..."

2015-12-13T19:52:42Z

Created page with "You are certain that it is somewhat weaker than you are (50). You are certain that it is somewhat less agile than you are (50). You are certain that it is somewhat less discip..."

New page

You are certain that it is somewhat weaker than you are (50).
You are certain that it is somewhat less agile than you are (50).
You are certain that it is somewhat less disciplined than you are (50).
You are certain that it is somewhat less quick to react than you are (50).
You are certain that it is rather less conditioned than you are (60).
Taking stock of its offensive abilities, and defending with a lumium round sipar and a steel throwing hammer, you are certain that the scaled atik'et is definitely less skilled.
Taking stock of its defensive abilities, and attacking with a steel throwing hammer, you are certain that the scaled atik'et is something that you could tear to shreds.
If you attacked with a steel throwing hammer, you are certain that the enemy would train somewhat poorly (362).
If you threw the hammer at the enemy you are certain that it would train somewhat poorly (362).
If you defended by parrying attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train somewhat poorly (406).
If you defended by evading attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train somewhat poorly (397).
If you defended by blocking attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train somewhat poorly (394).
If you attempted to beguile the enemy with tactics, you are certain that it would train acceptably (327).
If you attempted to debilitate the enemy, you are certain that it would train acceptably (332).
The atik'et appears immune to fire.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:53, 13 December 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	You are certain that it is somewhat weaker than you are (50).		You are certain that it is somewhat weaker than you are (50).<br />
	You are certain that it is somewhat less agile than you are (50).		You are certain that it is somewhat less agile than you are (50).<br />
	You are certain that it is somewhat less disciplined than you are (50).		You are certain that it is somewhat less disciplined than you are (50).<br />
	You are certain that it is somewhat less quick to react than you are (50).		You are certain that it is somewhat less quick to react than you are (50).<br />
	You are certain that it is rather less conditioned than you are (60).		You are certain that it is rather less conditioned than you are (60).<br />
	Taking stock of its offensive abilities, and defending with a lumium round sipar and a steel throwing hammer, you are certain that the scaled atik'et is definitely less skilled.		Taking stock of its offensive abilities, and defending with a lumium round sipar and a steel throwing hammer, you are certain that the scaled atik'et is definitely less skilled.<br />
	Taking stock of its defensive abilities, and attacking with a steel throwing hammer, you are certain that the scaled atik'et is something that you could tear to shreds.		Taking stock of its defensive abilities, and attacking with a steel throwing hammer, you are certain that the scaled atik'et is something that you could tear to shreds.<br />
	If you attacked with a steel throwing hammer, you are certain that the enemy would train somewhat poorly (362).		If you attacked with a steel throwing hammer, you are certain that the enemy would train somewhat poorly (362).<br />
	If you threw the hammer at the enemy you are certain that it would train somewhat poorly (362).		If you threw the hammer at the enemy you are certain that it would train somewhat poorly (362).<br />
	If you defended by parrying attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train somewhat poorly (406).		If you defended by parrying attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train somewhat poorly (406).<br />
	If you defended by evading attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train somewhat poorly (397).		If you defended by evading attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train somewhat poorly (397).<br />
	If you defended by blocking attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train somewhat poorly (394).		If you defended by blocking attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train somewhat poorly (394).<br />
	If you attempted to beguile the enemy with tactics, you are certain that it would train acceptably (327).		If you attempted to beguile the enemy with tactics, you are certain that it would train acceptably (327).<br />
	If you attempted to debilitate the enemy, you are certain that it would train acceptably (332).		If you attempted to debilitate the enemy, you are certain that it would train acceptably (332).<br />
	The atik'et appears immune to fire.		The atik'et appears immune to fire.<br />
			[[User:FROSC02\|FROSC02]] ([[User talk:FROSC02\|talk]])