Talk:Ranger trail system - Revision history

AUBREYC1: /* Difficulty of trails Z21 and Z29 (STR after Crossing ferry to Gondola and back) */

2016-09-10T09:02:21Z

Difficulty of trails Z21 and Z29 (STR after Crossing ferry to Gondola and back)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:02, 10 September 2016
Line 76:		Line 76:
	== Difficulty of trails Z21 and Z29 (STR after Crossing ferry to Gondola and back) ==		== Difficulty of trails Z21 and Z29 (STR after Crossing ferry to Gondola and back) ==

	I would classify trails Z21 and Z29 to be of "intermediate" difficulty if not a little lower. I could definitely run these trails at 100/low 100's scouting. --[[User:aubreyc1\|Amiris]]		I would classify trails Z21 and Z29 to be of "intermediate" difficulty if not a little lower. I could definitely run these trails at 100/low 100's scouting. [[User:aubreyc1\|Amiris]] 04:02, 10 September 2016 (CDT)

AUBREYC1: /* Difficulty of trails Z21 and Z29 (STR after Crossing ferry to Gondola and back) */ new section

2016-09-10T09:00:07Z

Difficulty of trails Z21 and Z29 (STR after Crossing ferry to Gondola and back): new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:00, 10 September 2016
Line 73:		Line 73:

	I was able to traverse the Z1/Z6 marked trails (NTR <-> Kaerna) with 40 ranks in Scouting and 53 ranks of perception, while the other beginner trails (West Gate <-> Wolf and Knife clan) I can't even find. --[[User:CALLEK\|CALLEK]] ([[User talk:CALLEK\|talk]]) 01:49, 26 May 2015 (CDT)		I was able to traverse the Z1/Z6 marked trails (NTR <-> Kaerna) with 40 ranks in Scouting and 53 ranks of perception, while the other beginner trails (West Gate <-> Wolf and Knife clan) I can't even find. --[[User:CALLEK\|CALLEK]] ([[User talk:CALLEK\|talk]]) 01:49, 26 May 2015 (CDT)

			== Difficulty of trails Z21 and Z29 (STR after Crossing ferry to Gondola and back) ==

			I would classify trails Z21 and Z29 to be of "intermediate" difficulty if not a little lower. I could definitely run these trails at 100/low 100's scouting. --[[User:aubreyc1\|Amiris]]

CALLEK: /* Easier than Beginner */

2015-05-26T06:49:44Z

Easier than Beginner

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:49, 26 May 2015
Line 72:		Line 72:
	== Easier than Beginner ==		== Easier than Beginner ==

	I was able to traverse the Z1/Z6 marked trails (NTR <-> Kaerna) with 40 ranks in Scouting and 53 ranks of perception, while the other beginner trails (West Gate <-> Wolf and Knife clan) I can't even find. --01:48, 26 May 2015 (CDT)		I was able to traverse the Z1/Z6 marked trails (NTR <-> Kaerna) with 40 ranks in Scouting and 53 ranks of perception, while the other beginner trails (West Gate <-> Wolf and Knife clan) I can't even find. --[[User:CALLEK\|CALLEK]] ([[User talk:CALLEK\|talk]]) 01:49, 26 May 2015 (CDT)

CALLEK: /* Easier than Beginner */ new section

2015-05-26T06:48:23Z

Easier than Beginner: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:48, 26 May 2015
Line 69:		Line 69:

	:Looking into this further, it appears some strange things have been done with the maps. While there are maps with the old trail numbers, there are others with the new numbers, and even a few trails with strange prefixes (L?). From a quick glance, it looks like the vast majority of trails still aren't on maps. Not much has changed since the numbering overhaul in Oct08. I suggest, to those very few of us that watch this, we systematically go through each of the maps (starting with 1) and correct them, with a very clear note in the history that it has been done. --[[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 18:52, 1 August 2010 (UTC)		:Looking into this further, it appears some strange things have been done with the maps. While there are maps with the old trail numbers, there are others with the new numbers, and even a few trails with strange prefixes (L?). From a quick glance, it looks like the vast majority of trails still aren't on maps. Not much has changed since the numbering overhaul in Oct08. I suggest, to those very few of us that watch this, we systematically go through each of the maps (starting with 1) and correct them, with a very clear note in the history that it has been done. --[[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 18:52, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

			== Easier than Beginner ==

			I was able to traverse the Z1/Z6 marked trails (NTR <-> Kaerna) with 40 ranks in Scouting and 53 ranks of perception, while the other beginner trails (West Gate <-> Wolf and Knife clan) I can't even find. --01:48, 26 May 2015 (CDT)

ABSOLON: ABSOLON moved page Talk:Ranger Trail System to Talk:Ranger trail system

2014-12-25T08:57:31Z

ABSOLON moved page Talk:Ranger Trail System to Talk:Ranger trail system

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:57, 25 December 2014
(No difference)

HRODBERACHT: /* Linking Ranger Trails to Ranik Maps */

2010-11-17T06:44:22Z

Linking Ranger Trails to Ranik Maps

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:44, 17 November 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	::::::::That's a good question. We'll need to add a field to the template for "Trail Number". I don't know if adding an entry will let the field auto increment, we may have to edit frequently in order to assign them numbers. My hope is that people will see and understand the pattern and start adding the correct sequential number to the list. Feels like I'm not explaining that right --[[User:Sirconnor\|Connor]] 15:00, 11 March 2008 (CDT)		::::::::That's a good question. We'll need to add a field to the template for "Trail Number". I don't know if adding an entry will let the field auto increment, we may have to edit frequently in order to assign them numbers. My hope is that people will see and understand the pattern and start adding the correct sequential number to the list. Feels like I'm not explaining that right --[[User:Sirconnor\|Connor]] 15:00, 11 March 2008 (CDT)
	:::::::::So what do you think the numbering system should be? T1 - T70 or 100 to 170? --[[User:Sirconnor\|Connor]] 11:53, 12 March 2008 (CDT)		:::::::::So what do you think the numbering system should be? T1 - T70 or 100 to 170? --[[User:Sirconnor\|Connor]] 11:53, 12 March 2008 (CDT)


			So, not much happening around here, as usual. I've updated maps for [[RanikMap121\|Boar Clan]] and the [[RanikMap129\|Monastery]], but I'm having doubts about the symbols. Unforeseen when we began this, there are multiple spots in the region where trails both start and end in the same room. I've added a new symbol for this on the Monastery map (others are outside of these two maps). I'm not sure if it's the best way to show that or not. As a matter of convention, I'm trying to stick with trail origin numbers on the right/top, and trail end numbers on the left/bottom. If there's agreement here that the symbols we have are the best to go with, then I'll try to continue in the same manner, and update the legend accordingly. Before I get too carried away, I just want to make sure this is the direction we want to be going in. If we run into three trails in the same room, I'm giving up. ^^ Any thoughts? - [[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 06:44, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

	== What's your number? ==		== What's your number? ==

HRODBERACHT: /* RTS numbering */

2010-08-01T18:59:56Z

RTS numbering

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:59, 1 August 2010
Line 63:		Line 63:


	I can't speak for whomever has been adding trails to the maps, but I haven't been able to figure out which system is being used either. Either trails haven't been added to the maps in nearly two years, someone is going off a very old list of trails, or something else entirely. Please don't change them back, though! We have 121 trails currently, and there's likely to be rather more by the end of the year. Going back to the old system would just make a mess of things both in the maps and here on this page, as I wrote above. ~~--[[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 18:52, 1 August 2010 (UTC)~~		:I can't speak for whomever has been adding trails to the maps, but I haven't been able to figure out which system is being used either. Either trails haven't been added to the maps in nearly two years, someone is going off a very old list of trails, or something else entirely. Please don't change them back, though! We have 121 trails currently, and there's likely to be rather more by the end of the year. Going back to the old system would just make a mess of things both in the maps and here on this page, as I wrote above.

			:Looking into this further, it appears some strange things have been done with the maps. While there are maps with the old trail numbers, there are others with the new numbers, and even a few trails with strange prefixes (L?). From a quick glance, it looks like the vast majority of trails still aren't on maps. Not much has changed since the numbering overhaul in Oct08. I suggest, to those very few of us that watch this, we systematically go through each of the maps (starting with 1) and correct them, with a very clear note in the history that it has been done. --[[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 18:52, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

HRODBERACHT: /* RTS numbering */

2010-08-01T18:52:21Z

RTS numbering

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:52, 1 August 2010
Line 61:		Line 61:

	So is the above what broke the system between Ranik's Maps and the trails listed here? Have the newer maps been created using the "new" trail numbering system, or would be people be okay with switching them back to how they were numbered before so that all of the Ranik maps aren't broken? --[[User:Ateles\|Ateles]] 17:00, 1 August 2010 (UTC)		So is the above what broke the system between Ranik's Maps and the trails listed here? Have the newer maps been created using the "new" trail numbering system, or would be people be okay with switching them back to how they were numbered before so that all of the Ranik maps aren't broken? --[[User:Ateles\|Ateles]] 17:00, 1 August 2010 (UTC)


			I can't speak for whomever has been adding trails to the maps, but I haven't been able to figure out which system is being used either. Either trails haven't been added to the maps in nearly two years, someone is going off a very old list of trails, or something else entirely. Please don't change them back, though! We have 121 trails currently, and there's likely to be rather more by the end of the year. Going back to the old system would just make a mess of things both in the maps and here on this page, as I wrote above. --[[User:Hrodberacht\|Hrodberacht]] 18:52, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Maintenance script at 17:00, 1 August 2010

2010-08-01T17:00:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:00, 1 August 2010
Line 59:		Line 59:
	Just to clarify, the prefix is for the province of origin. Since very few maps contain territory in more than once province, trails indicated on maps will not need this prefix and can continue to be shown as they are now.		Just to clarify, the prefix is for the province of origin. Since very few maps contain territory in more than once province, trails indicated on maps will not need this prefix and can continue to be shown as they are now.
	--[[User:hrodberacht\|hrodberacht]] 19:14, 15 October 2008		--[[User:hrodberacht\|hrodberacht]] 19:14, 15 October 2008

			So is the above what broke the system between Ranik's Maps and the trails listed here? Have the newer maps been created using the "new" trail numbering system, or would be people be okay with switching them back to how they were numbered before so that all of the Ranik maps aren't broken? --[[User:Ateles\|Ateles]] 17:00, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Maintenance script: /* Therengia */

2010-05-21T23:12:54Z

Therengia

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:12, 21 May 2010
Line 59:		Line 59:
	Just to clarify, the prefix is for the province of origin. Since very few maps contain territory in more than once province, trails indicated on maps will not need this prefix and can continue to be shown as they are now.		Just to clarify, the prefix is for the province of origin. Since very few maps contain territory in more than once province, trails indicated on maps will not need this prefix and can continue to be shown as they are now.
	--[[User:hrodberacht\|hrodberacht]] 19:14, 15 October 2008		--[[User:hrodberacht\|hrodberacht]] 19:14, 15 October 2008

	== Therengia ==

	'''Trail 1'''
	You notice a trailmarker carved into an oak log.

	'''Trail 2'''
	You notice a trailmarker chiseled into a mottled brown fieldstone.

	'''Trail 3'''
	You notice a trailmarker half-buried in the dirt.

	'''Trail 4'''
	You notice a trailmarker carved into a decaying stump.

	'''Trail 5'''
	You notice a trailmarker carved into a brown river stone.

	'''Trail 6'''
	You notice a trailmarker tied to a curseweed shrub.

	'''Trail 7'''
	You notice a trailmarker hanging from a low branch.

	'''Trail 8'''
	You notice a trailmarker carved into the end grain of a mistwood log.

	'''Trail 9'''
	You notice a trailmarker tied to a mistwood sapling.

	'''Trail 10'''
	You notice a trailmarker on a broken brick off to one side of the road.