Talk:Prediction - Revision history

Maintenance script at 19:08, 18 October 2010

2010-10-18T19:08:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 18 October 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:

	*"The initial prediction and each 'after that' appears to be for approximately 10 minutes each. At 105 astrology I can see what is coming and 3 'after thats'. The final 'after that' appears to change so maybe I can not def. see what it will be. - Dahlestia		*"The initial prediction and each 'after that' appears to be for approximately 10 minutes each. At 105 astrology I can see what is coming and 3 'after thats'. The final 'after that' appears to change so maybe I can not def. see what it will be. - Dahlestia
	*"At 121 astrology I can see 4 after thats"- Dahlestia		:"At 121 astrology I can see 4 after thats"- Dahlestia
			:With 381 astrology, there are 9 "after that"s - --[[User:Hithrael\|Hithrael]] 19:08, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Maintenance script: /* Predict Weather Data */ new section

2010-10-18T17:55:12Z

Predict Weather Data: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:55, 18 October 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::Another way of saying it is that if you don't get power/duration messaging you will 'always' have some degree of inaccuracy. If you do get power/duraction messaginc you will 'always' be accurate.--[[User:Evran\|Evran]] 16:13, 6 August 2010 (UTC)		:::Another way of saying it is that if you don't get power/duration messaging you will 'always' have some degree of inaccuracy. If you do get power/duraction messaginc you will 'always' be accurate.--[[User:Evran\|Evran]] 16:13, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
	:::Okay, now the next question. What is there to be accurate about, other than power/duration? I suspect that this was intending to say "inaccuracy only exists within the power/duration readings", but, like the second half of the sentence, it was reversed.		:::Okay, now the next question. What is there to be accurate about, other than power/duration? I suspect that this was intending to say "inaccuracy only exists within the power/duration readings", but, like the second half of the sentence, it was reversed.

			== Predict Weather Data ==

			*"The initial prediction and each 'after that' appears to be for approximately 10 minutes each. At 105 astrology I can see what is coming and 3 'after thats'. The final 'after that' appears to change so maybe I can not def. see what it will be. - Dahlestia
			*"At 121 astrology I can see 4 after thats"- Dahlestia

Maintenance script at 16:18, 6 August 2010

2010-08-06T16:18:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:18, 6 August 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:::No. Its saying that ''if'' there's innacuracy because you don't get full power/duration messaging, then that innacuracy will decrease with skill but never completely go away.		:::No. Its saying that ''if'' there's innacuracy because you don't get full power/duration messaging, then that innacuracy will decrease with skill but never completely go away.
	:::Another way of saying it is that if you don't get power/duration messaging you will 'always' have some degree of inaccuracy. If you do get power/duraction messaginc you will 'always' be accurate.--[[User:Evran\|Evran]] 16:13, 6 August 2010 (UTC)		:::Another way of saying it is that if you don't get power/duration messaging you will 'always' have some degree of inaccuracy. If you do get power/duraction messaginc you will 'always' be accurate.--[[User:Evran\|Evran]] 16:13, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
			:::Okay, now the next question. What is there to be accurate about, other than power/duration? I suspect that this was intending to say "inaccuracy only exists within the power/duration readings", but, like the second half of the sentence, it was reversed.

Maintenance script at 16:13, 6 August 2010

2010-08-06T16:13:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:13, 6 August 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:The second bit is now fixed.--[[User:Evran\|Evran]] 15:44, 6 August 2010 (UTC)		:The second bit is now fixed.--[[User:Evran\|Evran]] 15:44, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
	::But that's completely inconsistent with the claim "[inaccuracy will] always remain to some degree."		::But that's completely inconsistent with the claim "[inaccuracy will] always remain to some degree."
			:::No. Its saying that ''if'' there's innacuracy because you don't get full power/duration messaging, then that innacuracy will decrease with skill but never completely go away.
			:::Another way of saying it is that if you don't get power/duration messaging you will 'always' have some degree of inaccuracy. If you do get power/duraction messaginc you will 'always' be accurate.--[[User:Evran\|Evran]] 16:13, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Maintenance script at 16:07, 6 August 2010

2010-08-06T16:07:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:07, 6 August 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:The first bit means that if you get both the power and duration readings, they will be accurate. Note: I'm not claiming this to be correct, although I suspect it is. I'm just 'translating' it for you.		:The first bit means that if you get both the power and duration readings, they will be accurate. Note: I'm not claiming this to be correct, although I suspect it is. I'm just 'translating' it for you.
	:The second bit is now fixed.--[[User:Evran\|Evran]] 15:44, 6 August 2010 (UTC)		:The second bit is now fixed.--[[User:Evran\|Evran]] 15:44, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
			::But that's completely inconsistent with the claim "[inaccuracy will] always remain to some degree."

Maintenance script at 15:44, 6 August 2010

2010-08-06T15:44:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:44, 6 August 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I have no idea what the first half of that sentence is trying to say, but I find it unlikely that inaccuracy increases with skill.--[[User:Antendren\|Antendren]] 15:24, 6 August 2010 (UTC)		I have no idea what the first half of that sentence is trying to say, but I find it unlikely that inaccuracy increases with skill.--[[User:Antendren\|Antendren]] 15:24, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
			:The first bit means that if you get both the power and duration readings, they will be accurate. Note: I'm not claiming this to be correct, although I suspect it is. I'm just 'translating' it for you.
			:The second bit is now fixed.--[[User:Evran\|Evran]] 15:44, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Maintenance script: Created page with '"Inaccuracy only exists without power/duration readings and will increase with skill but almost always remain to some degree." (from Analyze) I have no idea what the first half…'

2010-08-06T15:24:17Z

Created page with '"Inaccuracy only exists without power/duration readings and will increase with skill but almost always remain to some degree." (from Analyze) I have no idea what the first half…'

New page

"Inaccuracy only exists without power/duration readings and will increase with skill but almost always remain to some degree." (from Analyze)

I have no idea what the first half of that sentence is trying to say, but I find it unlikely that inaccuracy increases with skill.--[[User:Antendren|Antendren]] 15:24, 6 August 2010 (UTC)