Talk:Gorbesh Language (book) - Revision history

CARAAMON: moved Talk:Gorbesh Language, The (book) to Talk:Gorbesh Language (book)

2011-03-17T21:08:56Z

moved Talk:Gorbesh Language, The (book) to Talk:Gorbesh Language (book)

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:08, 17 March 2011
(No difference)

CARAAMON: Talk:The Gorbesh Language (book) moved to Talk:Gorbesh Language, The (book)

2009-01-28T18:49:35Z

Talk:The Gorbesh Language (book) moved to Talk:Gorbesh Language, The (book)

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:49, 28 January 2009
(No difference)

Maintenance script at 00:58, 20 November 2007

2007-11-20T00:58:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 19 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Regarding wikification: for the language books, is it necessary? In general, the function of these books is such that links to other topics will be minimal. So leaving the book inside "pre" tags is fine; nothing needs to be linked. Leaving things as they are also has the benefit of allowing editors to put their effort to more productive ends than (mostly pointless) formatting. --[[User:Basselope\|Basselope]] 18:25, 19 November 2007 (CST)		Regarding wikification: for the language books, is it necessary? In general, the function of these books is such that links to other topics will be minimal. So leaving the book inside "pre" tags is fine; nothing needs to be linked. Leaving things as they are also has the benefit of allowing editors to put their effort to more productive ends than (mostly pointless) formatting. --[[User:Basselope\|Basselope]] 18:25, 19 November 2007 (CST)
	:I tend to lean towards thinking this way for the language books too.... it's a LOT of editing to put them into tables. It's actually easier for me to read in the pre tags. My 2 copper.--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 18:45, 19 November 2007 (CST)		:I tend to lean towards thinking this way for the language books too.... it's a LOT of editing to put them into tables. It's actually easier for me to read in the pre tags. My 2 copper.--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 18:45, 19 November 2007 (CST)

			:I also agree... but I also think it is nice to separate sections into their separate letters so there is a Table of Contents with A-Z on it. --[[User:Kraelyst\|Kraelyst]] 18:58, 19 November 2007 (CST)

Maintenance script at 00:50, 20 November 2007

2007-11-20T00:50:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:50, 19 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Regarding wikification: for the language books, is it necessary? In general, the function of these books is such that links to other topics will be minimal. So leaving the book inside "pre" tags is fine; nothing needs to be linked. Leaving things as they are also has the benefit of allowing editors to put their effort to more productive ends than (mostly pointless) formatting. --[[User:Basselope\|Basselope]] 18:25, 19 November 2007 (CST)		Regarding wikification: for the language books, is it necessary? In general, the function of these books is such that links to other topics will be minimal. So leaving the book inside "pre" tags is fine; nothing needs to be linked. Leaving things as they are also has the benefit of allowing editors to put their effort to more productive ends than (mostly pointless) formatting. --[[User:Basselope\|Basselope]] 18:25, 19 November 2007 (CST)
	I tend to lean towards thinking this way for the language books too.... it's a LOT of editing to put them into tables. It's actually easier for me to read in the pre tags. My 2 copper.--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 18:45, 19 November 2007 (CST)		:I tend to lean towards thinking this way for the language books too.... it's a LOT of editing to put them into tables. It's actually easier for me to read in the pre tags. My 2 copper.--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 18:45, 19 November 2007 (CST)

Maintenance script at 00:45, 20 November 2007

2007-11-20T00:45:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:45, 19 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Regarding wikification: for the language books, is it necessary? In general, the function of these books is such that links to other topics will be minimal. So leaving the book inside "pre" tags is fine; nothing needs to be linked. Leaving things as they are also has the benefit of allowing editors to put their effort to more productive ends than (mostly pointless) formatting. --[[User:Basselope\|Basselope]] 18:25, 19 November 2007 (CST)		Regarding wikification: for the language books, is it necessary? In general, the function of these books is such that links to other topics will be minimal. So leaving the book inside "pre" tags is fine; nothing needs to be linked. Leaving things as they are also has the benefit of allowing editors to put their effort to more productive ends than (mostly pointless) formatting. --[[User:Basselope\|Basselope]] 18:25, 19 November 2007 (CST)
			I tend to lean towards thinking this way for the language books too.... it's a LOT of editing to put them into tables. It's actually easier for me to read in the pre tags. My 2 copper.--[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 18:45, 19 November 2007 (CST)

Maintenance script: New page: Regarding wikification: for the language books, is it necessary? In general, the function of these books is such that links to other topics will be minimal. So leaving the book inside "p...

2007-11-20T00:25:34Z

New page: Regarding wikification: for the language books, is it necessary? In general, the function of these books is such that links to other topics will be minimal. So leaving the book inside "p...

New page

Regarding wikification: for the language books, is it necessary? In general, the function of these books is such that links to other topics will be minimal. So leaving the book inside "pre" tags is fine; nothing needs to be linked. Leaving things as they are also has the benefit of allowing editors to put their effort to more productive ends than (mostly pointless) formatting. --[[User:Basselope|Basselope]] 18:25, 19 November 2007 (CST)